Influence of flavors on the propagation of e-cigarette–related information

Social media study

Jiaqi Zhou, Qingpeng Zhang, Dajun Zeng, Kwok Leung Tsui

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Modeling the influence of e-cigarette flavors on information propagation could provide quantitative policy decision support concerning smoking initiation and contagion, as well as e-cigarette regulations. Objective: The objective of this study was to characterize the influence of flavors on e-cigarette–related information propagation on social media. Methods: We collected a comprehensive dataset of e-cigarette–related discussions from public Pages on Facebook. We identified 11 categories of flavors based on commonly used categorizations. Each post’s frequency of being shared served as a proxy measure of information propagation. We evaluated a set of regression models and chose the hurdle negative binomial model to characterize the influence of different flavors and nonflavor control variables on e-cigarette–related information propagation. Results: We found that 5 flavors (sweet, dessert & bakery, fruits, herbs & spices, and tobacco) had significantly negative influences on e-cigarette–related information propagation, indicating the users’ tendency not to share posts related to these flavors. We did not find a positive significance of any flavors, which is contradictory to previous research. In addition, we found that a set of nonflavor–related factors were associated with information propagation. Conclusions: Mentions of flavors in posts did not enhance the popularity of e-cigarette–related information. Certain flavors could even have reduced the popularity of information, indicating users’ lack of interest in flavors. Promoting e-cigarette–related information with mention of flavors is not an effective marketing approach. This study implies the potential concern of users about flavorings and suggests a need to regulate the use of flavorings in e-cigarettes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere27
JournalJournal of Medical Internet Research
Volume20
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2018

Fingerprint

Social Media
Tobacco Products
Spices
Proxy
Statistical Models
Marketing
Tobacco
Fruit
Smoking
Research

Keywords

  • E-cigarettes
  • Electronic nicotine delivery systems
  • Flavoring agents
  • Flavors
  • Information dissemination
  • Information propagation
  • Social media
  • Social networking
  • Social networks

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Informatics

Cite this

Influence of flavors on the propagation of e-cigarette–related information : Social media study. / Zhou, Jiaqi; Zhang, Qingpeng; Zeng, Dajun; Tsui, Kwok Leung.

In: Journal of Medical Internet Research, Vol. 20, No. 3, e27, 01.03.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7ea61ddc0ecd424cbcab1ed35aecc3f7,
title = "Influence of flavors on the propagation of e-cigarette–related information: Social media study",
abstract = "Background: Modeling the influence of e-cigarette flavors on information propagation could provide quantitative policy decision support concerning smoking initiation and contagion, as well as e-cigarette regulations. Objective: The objective of this study was to characterize the influence of flavors on e-cigarette–related information propagation on social media. Methods: We collected a comprehensive dataset of e-cigarette–related discussions from public Pages on Facebook. We identified 11 categories of flavors based on commonly used categorizations. Each post’s frequency of being shared served as a proxy measure of information propagation. We evaluated a set of regression models and chose the hurdle negative binomial model to characterize the influence of different flavors and nonflavor control variables on e-cigarette–related information propagation. Results: We found that 5 flavors (sweet, dessert & bakery, fruits, herbs & spices, and tobacco) had significantly negative influences on e-cigarette–related information propagation, indicating the users’ tendency not to share posts related to these flavors. We did not find a positive significance of any flavors, which is contradictory to previous research. In addition, we found that a set of nonflavor–related factors were associated with information propagation. Conclusions: Mentions of flavors in posts did not enhance the popularity of e-cigarette–related information. Certain flavors could even have reduced the popularity of information, indicating users’ lack of interest in flavors. Promoting e-cigarette–related information with mention of flavors is not an effective marketing approach. This study implies the potential concern of users about flavorings and suggests a need to regulate the use of flavorings in e-cigarettes.",
keywords = "E-cigarettes, Electronic nicotine delivery systems, Flavoring agents, Flavors, Information dissemination, Information propagation, Social media, Social networking, Social networks",
author = "Jiaqi Zhou and Qingpeng Zhang and Dajun Zeng and Tsui, {Kwok Leung}",
year = "2018",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2196/publichealth.7998",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
journal = "Journal of Medical Internet Research",
issn = "1439-4456",
publisher = "Journal of medical Internet Research",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Influence of flavors on the propagation of e-cigarette–related information

T2 - Social media study

AU - Zhou, Jiaqi

AU - Zhang, Qingpeng

AU - Zeng, Dajun

AU - Tsui, Kwok Leung

PY - 2018/3/1

Y1 - 2018/3/1

N2 - Background: Modeling the influence of e-cigarette flavors on information propagation could provide quantitative policy decision support concerning smoking initiation and contagion, as well as e-cigarette regulations. Objective: The objective of this study was to characterize the influence of flavors on e-cigarette–related information propagation on social media. Methods: We collected a comprehensive dataset of e-cigarette–related discussions from public Pages on Facebook. We identified 11 categories of flavors based on commonly used categorizations. Each post’s frequency of being shared served as a proxy measure of information propagation. We evaluated a set of regression models and chose the hurdle negative binomial model to characterize the influence of different flavors and nonflavor control variables on e-cigarette–related information propagation. Results: We found that 5 flavors (sweet, dessert & bakery, fruits, herbs & spices, and tobacco) had significantly negative influences on e-cigarette–related information propagation, indicating the users’ tendency not to share posts related to these flavors. We did not find a positive significance of any flavors, which is contradictory to previous research. In addition, we found that a set of nonflavor–related factors were associated with information propagation. Conclusions: Mentions of flavors in posts did not enhance the popularity of e-cigarette–related information. Certain flavors could even have reduced the popularity of information, indicating users’ lack of interest in flavors. Promoting e-cigarette–related information with mention of flavors is not an effective marketing approach. This study implies the potential concern of users about flavorings and suggests a need to regulate the use of flavorings in e-cigarettes.

AB - Background: Modeling the influence of e-cigarette flavors on information propagation could provide quantitative policy decision support concerning smoking initiation and contagion, as well as e-cigarette regulations. Objective: The objective of this study was to characterize the influence of flavors on e-cigarette–related information propagation on social media. Methods: We collected a comprehensive dataset of e-cigarette–related discussions from public Pages on Facebook. We identified 11 categories of flavors based on commonly used categorizations. Each post’s frequency of being shared served as a proxy measure of information propagation. We evaluated a set of regression models and chose the hurdle negative binomial model to characterize the influence of different flavors and nonflavor control variables on e-cigarette–related information propagation. Results: We found that 5 flavors (sweet, dessert & bakery, fruits, herbs & spices, and tobacco) had significantly negative influences on e-cigarette–related information propagation, indicating the users’ tendency not to share posts related to these flavors. We did not find a positive significance of any flavors, which is contradictory to previous research. In addition, we found that a set of nonflavor–related factors were associated with information propagation. Conclusions: Mentions of flavors in posts did not enhance the popularity of e-cigarette–related information. Certain flavors could even have reduced the popularity of information, indicating users’ lack of interest in flavors. Promoting e-cigarette–related information with mention of flavors is not an effective marketing approach. This study implies the potential concern of users about flavorings and suggests a need to regulate the use of flavorings in e-cigarettes.

KW - E-cigarettes

KW - Electronic nicotine delivery systems

KW - Flavoring agents

KW - Flavors

KW - Information dissemination

KW - Information propagation

KW - Social media

KW - Social networking

KW - Social networks

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047764254&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85047764254&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2196/publichealth.7998

DO - 10.2196/publichealth.7998

M3 - Article

VL - 20

JO - Journal of Medical Internet Research

JF - Journal of Medical Internet Research

SN - 1439-4456

IS - 3

M1 - e27

ER -