Informalization, inequalities and global insecurities

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Global restructuring has dramatically affected the value, extent, and significance of informal economic activities worldwide. Approaching informalization as a systemic phenomenon, this essay illuminates linkages among economic processes, widening inequalities, "governance gaps," and global insecurities. It considers the historical context in which distinctive approaches to informality emerged and reviews three principal "islands" of existing research: mainstream, structuralist, and feminist. These variously illuminate patterns of economic inequality that are central to studies of international political economy. Informality's significance to IR and security studies is further illuminated through a discussion of the processes and political economy of informalization in relation to global migrations, and the interaction of economic and political informalization in the context of "new" wars and security crises.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)244-270
Number of pages27
JournalInternational Studies Review
Volume12
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2010

Fingerprint

political economy
economics
economic activity
restructuring
migration
governance
interaction
Values

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

Informalization, inequalities and global insecurities. / Peterson, V Spike.

In: International Studies Review, Vol. 12, No. 2, 06.2010, p. 244-270.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5c29e1b941f048039ca779b1b1cdeab7,
title = "Informalization, inequalities and global insecurities",
abstract = "Global restructuring has dramatically affected the value, extent, and significance of informal economic activities worldwide. Approaching informalization as a systemic phenomenon, this essay illuminates linkages among economic processes, widening inequalities, {"}governance gaps,{"} and global insecurities. It considers the historical context in which distinctive approaches to informality emerged and reviews three principal {"}islands{"} of existing research: mainstream, structuralist, and feminist. These variously illuminate patterns of economic inequality that are central to studies of international political economy. Informality's significance to IR and security studies is further illuminated through a discussion of the processes and political economy of informalization in relation to global migrations, and the interaction of economic and political informalization in the context of {"}new{"} wars and security crises.",
author = "Peterson, {V Spike}",
year = "2010",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1111/j.1468-2486.2010.00930.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
pages = "244--270",
journal = "International Studies Review",
issn = "1521-9488",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Informalization, inequalities and global insecurities

AU - Peterson, V Spike

PY - 2010/6

Y1 - 2010/6

N2 - Global restructuring has dramatically affected the value, extent, and significance of informal economic activities worldwide. Approaching informalization as a systemic phenomenon, this essay illuminates linkages among economic processes, widening inequalities, "governance gaps," and global insecurities. It considers the historical context in which distinctive approaches to informality emerged and reviews three principal "islands" of existing research: mainstream, structuralist, and feminist. These variously illuminate patterns of economic inequality that are central to studies of international political economy. Informality's significance to IR and security studies is further illuminated through a discussion of the processes and political economy of informalization in relation to global migrations, and the interaction of economic and political informalization in the context of "new" wars and security crises.

AB - Global restructuring has dramatically affected the value, extent, and significance of informal economic activities worldwide. Approaching informalization as a systemic phenomenon, this essay illuminates linkages among economic processes, widening inequalities, "governance gaps," and global insecurities. It considers the historical context in which distinctive approaches to informality emerged and reviews three principal "islands" of existing research: mainstream, structuralist, and feminist. These variously illuminate patterns of economic inequality that are central to studies of international political economy. Informality's significance to IR and security studies is further illuminated through a discussion of the processes and political economy of informalization in relation to global migrations, and the interaction of economic and political informalization in the context of "new" wars and security crises.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77953222296&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77953222296&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1468-2486.2010.00930.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1468-2486.2010.00930.x

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 244

EP - 270

JO - International Studies Review

JF - International Studies Review

SN - 1521-9488

IS - 2

ER -