Information access and protest policing post-9/11

Studying the policing of the 2004 Republican National Convention

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The War on Terror, created by the Bush administration in the wake of 9/11, has brought about changes in domestic intelligence and protest policing that have proven hard to conclusively identify, track, and explain despite the importance of these changes to research on the repression of social movements. This paper argues that a second important trend has also been part of the War on Terror: increasing government secrecy regarding its protest control and anti-terrorism programs. Using battles over access to information on NYPD's and the City of New York's planning for, and execution of, protest control strategies at the 2004 Republican National Convention, this article examines how information secrecy operates by using fears of terrorism as a veil and examines the collateral damage to academic inquiry, and therefore also to public dialogue and debate, created by increasing government secrecy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)44-60
Number of pages17
JournalAmerican Behavioral Scientist
Volume53
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Confidentiality
protest
Terrorism
terrorism
secrecy
Access to Information
Intelligence
Fear
repression
Social Movements
intelligence
damages
dialogue
anxiety
Research
planning
trend
Warfare

Keywords

  • 9/11
  • Protest
  • Repression
  • Secrecy
  • Terrorism

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Social Sciences(all)
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Cultural Studies
  • Education

Cite this

@article{586281dbfb6b4d938356721ff12b9598,
title = "Information access and protest policing post-9/11: Studying the policing of the 2004 Republican National Convention",
abstract = "The War on Terror, created by the Bush administration in the wake of 9/11, has brought about changes in domestic intelligence and protest policing that have proven hard to conclusively identify, track, and explain despite the importance of these changes to research on the repression of social movements. This paper argues that a second important trend has also been part of the War on Terror: increasing government secrecy regarding its protest control and anti-terrorism programs. Using battles over access to information on NYPD's and the City of New York's planning for, and execution of, protest control strategies at the 2004 Republican National Convention, this article examines how information secrecy operates by using fears of terrorism as a veil and examines the collateral damage to academic inquiry, and therefore also to public dialogue and debate, created by increasing government secrecy.",
keywords = "9/11, Protest, Repression, Secrecy, Terrorism",
author = "Earl, {Jennifer Suzanne}",
year = "2009",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1177/0002764209338784",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "53",
pages = "44--60",
journal = "American Behavioral Scientist",
issn = "0002-7642",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Information access and protest policing post-9/11

T2 - Studying the policing of the 2004 Republican National Convention

AU - Earl, Jennifer Suzanne

PY - 2009/9

Y1 - 2009/9

N2 - The War on Terror, created by the Bush administration in the wake of 9/11, has brought about changes in domestic intelligence and protest policing that have proven hard to conclusively identify, track, and explain despite the importance of these changes to research on the repression of social movements. This paper argues that a second important trend has also been part of the War on Terror: increasing government secrecy regarding its protest control and anti-terrorism programs. Using battles over access to information on NYPD's and the City of New York's planning for, and execution of, protest control strategies at the 2004 Republican National Convention, this article examines how information secrecy operates by using fears of terrorism as a veil and examines the collateral damage to academic inquiry, and therefore also to public dialogue and debate, created by increasing government secrecy.

AB - The War on Terror, created by the Bush administration in the wake of 9/11, has brought about changes in domestic intelligence and protest policing that have proven hard to conclusively identify, track, and explain despite the importance of these changes to research on the repression of social movements. This paper argues that a second important trend has also been part of the War on Terror: increasing government secrecy regarding its protest control and anti-terrorism programs. Using battles over access to information on NYPD's and the City of New York's planning for, and execution of, protest control strategies at the 2004 Republican National Convention, this article examines how information secrecy operates by using fears of terrorism as a veil and examines the collateral damage to academic inquiry, and therefore also to public dialogue and debate, created by increasing government secrecy.

KW - 9/11

KW - Protest

KW - Repression

KW - Secrecy

KW - Terrorism

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70249135321&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70249135321&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0002764209338784

DO - 10.1177/0002764209338784

M3 - Article

VL - 53

SP - 44

EP - 60

JO - American Behavioral Scientist

JF - American Behavioral Scientist

SN - 0002-7642

IS - 1

ER -