Information is what you make of it: The influence of group history and computer support on information sharing, decision quality, and member perceptions

Brian E. Mennecke, Joseph S Valacich

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

68 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Researchers have proposed that the contradictions observed between past group support system (GSS) laboratory and field research may be partially accounted for by the ad-hoc nature of the groups that are often used in the laboratory. To examine this, a laboratory experiment examining the influence of group history (i.e., established versus ad-hoc groups) and the level of computer support (i.e., communicating via a computer-mediated system versus face-to-face) was conducted. Dependent variables examined in the research include information-sharing performance, decision quality, and member perceptions. Subjects completed a hidden profile task - a task where some information is held by all group members prior to the meeting, while other information is held only by a subset of the group. As expected, established groups discussed less unique information than ad-hoc groups. In addition, information sharing was positively related to the quality of group decisions. Members of established groups were more satisfie d than members of ad-hoc groups; members using the computer-mediated system were less satisfied than those communicating face-to-face. In addition, group cohesion was positively related to satisfaction and decision quality. The results are discussed in the context of prior theory and research. Opportunities for future research are also described.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)173-197
Number of pages25
JournalJournal of Management Information Systems
Volume15
Issue number2
StatePublished - Sep 1998

Fingerprint

Computer systems
history
Group
Information sharing
Decision quality
Ad hoc
group decision
Experiments
laboratory experiment
field research
group cohesion
group membership
performance
Group cohesion
Laboratory experiments
Field research
Group support systems
Group decision

Keywords

  • Decision-group history
  • Group cohesion
  • Group support systems
  • Information sharing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Information Systems
  • Management Information Systems
  • Library and Information Sciences
  • Management of Technology and Innovation
  • Strategy and Management

Cite this

@article{93a6afb7804245918f03dfce27731df2,
title = "Information is what you make of it: The influence of group history and computer support on information sharing, decision quality, and member perceptions",
abstract = "Researchers have proposed that the contradictions observed between past group support system (GSS) laboratory and field research may be partially accounted for by the ad-hoc nature of the groups that are often used in the laboratory. To examine this, a laboratory experiment examining the influence of group history (i.e., established versus ad-hoc groups) and the level of computer support (i.e., communicating via a computer-mediated system versus face-to-face) was conducted. Dependent variables examined in the research include information-sharing performance, decision quality, and member perceptions. Subjects completed a hidden profile task - a task where some information is held by all group members prior to the meeting, while other information is held only by a subset of the group. As expected, established groups discussed less unique information than ad-hoc groups. In addition, information sharing was positively related to the quality of group decisions. Members of established groups were more satisfie d than members of ad-hoc groups; members using the computer-mediated system were less satisfied than those communicating face-to-face. In addition, group cohesion was positively related to satisfaction and decision quality. The results are discussed in the context of prior theory and research. Opportunities for future research are also described.",
keywords = "Decision-group history, Group cohesion, Group support systems, Information sharing",
author = "Mennecke, {Brian E.} and Valacich, {Joseph S}",
year = "1998",
month = "9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "173--197",
journal = "Journal of Management Information Systems",
issn = "0742-1222",
publisher = "M.E. Sharpe Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Information is what you make of it

T2 - The influence of group history and computer support on information sharing, decision quality, and member perceptions

AU - Mennecke, Brian E.

AU - Valacich, Joseph S

PY - 1998/9

Y1 - 1998/9

N2 - Researchers have proposed that the contradictions observed between past group support system (GSS) laboratory and field research may be partially accounted for by the ad-hoc nature of the groups that are often used in the laboratory. To examine this, a laboratory experiment examining the influence of group history (i.e., established versus ad-hoc groups) and the level of computer support (i.e., communicating via a computer-mediated system versus face-to-face) was conducted. Dependent variables examined in the research include information-sharing performance, decision quality, and member perceptions. Subjects completed a hidden profile task - a task where some information is held by all group members prior to the meeting, while other information is held only by a subset of the group. As expected, established groups discussed less unique information than ad-hoc groups. In addition, information sharing was positively related to the quality of group decisions. Members of established groups were more satisfie d than members of ad-hoc groups; members using the computer-mediated system were less satisfied than those communicating face-to-face. In addition, group cohesion was positively related to satisfaction and decision quality. The results are discussed in the context of prior theory and research. Opportunities for future research are also described.

AB - Researchers have proposed that the contradictions observed between past group support system (GSS) laboratory and field research may be partially accounted for by the ad-hoc nature of the groups that are often used in the laboratory. To examine this, a laboratory experiment examining the influence of group history (i.e., established versus ad-hoc groups) and the level of computer support (i.e., communicating via a computer-mediated system versus face-to-face) was conducted. Dependent variables examined in the research include information-sharing performance, decision quality, and member perceptions. Subjects completed a hidden profile task - a task where some information is held by all group members prior to the meeting, while other information is held only by a subset of the group. As expected, established groups discussed less unique information than ad-hoc groups. In addition, information sharing was positively related to the quality of group decisions. Members of established groups were more satisfie d than members of ad-hoc groups; members using the computer-mediated system were less satisfied than those communicating face-to-face. In addition, group cohesion was positively related to satisfaction and decision quality. The results are discussed in the context of prior theory and research. Opportunities for future research are also described.

KW - Decision-group history

KW - Group cohesion

KW - Group support systems

KW - Information sharing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032223731&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032223731&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0032223731

VL - 15

SP - 173

EP - 197

JO - Journal of Management Information Systems

JF - Journal of Management Information Systems

SN - 0742-1222

IS - 2

ER -