Information, networks, and the complexity of trust in commons governance

Adam D Henry, Thomas Dietz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

32 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The publication of Elinor Ostrom's (1990) Governing the Commons fueled significant theoretical and empirical progress in the field of commons governance and collective action, most notably in the form of the Institutional Analysis and Development (IAD) framework. A central question within this literature is how trust is created, maintained, and potentially destroyed in the context of sustainability issues. While the commons literature has provided a deeper understanding of trust, most empirical work has been done in relatively simple settings that do not capture the complexity of many global, institutionally-complex dilemmas that we face today. This paper discusses how our understanding of trust in these more complex settings may be improved by considering how two broad categories of variables-belief systems and networks-influence trust.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)188-212
Number of pages25
JournalInternational Journal of the Commons
Volume5
Issue number2
StatePublished - Aug 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

governance
collective behavior
sustainability
literature

Keywords

  • Advocacy coalition framework (ACF)
  • Belief systems
  • Common pool resources
  • Homophily
  • Information
  • Institutional analysis and development (IAD)
  • Networks
  • Reputation
  • Risk
  • Sustainability
  • Transitivity
  • Trust

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Information, networks, and the complexity of trust in commons governance. / Henry, Adam D; Dietz, Thomas.

In: International Journal of the Commons, Vol. 5, No. 2, 08.2011, p. 188-212.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1453ee49e20c418284d5f214e0c9ea35,
title = "Information, networks, and the complexity of trust in commons governance",
abstract = "The publication of Elinor Ostrom's (1990) Governing the Commons fueled significant theoretical and empirical progress in the field of commons governance and collective action, most notably in the form of the Institutional Analysis and Development (IAD) framework. A central question within this literature is how trust is created, maintained, and potentially destroyed in the context of sustainability issues. While the commons literature has provided a deeper understanding of trust, most empirical work has been done in relatively simple settings that do not capture the complexity of many global, institutionally-complex dilemmas that we face today. This paper discusses how our understanding of trust in these more complex settings may be improved by considering how two broad categories of variables-belief systems and networks-influence trust.",
keywords = "Advocacy coalition framework (ACF), Belief systems, Common pool resources, Homophily, Information, Institutional analysis and development (IAD), Networks, Reputation, Risk, Sustainability, Transitivity, Trust",
author = "Henry, {Adam D} and Thomas Dietz",
year = "2011",
month = "8",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
pages = "188--212",
journal = "International Journal of the Commons",
issn = "1875-0281",
publisher = "International Association for the Study of the Commons",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Information, networks, and the complexity of trust in commons governance

AU - Henry, Adam D

AU - Dietz, Thomas

PY - 2011/8

Y1 - 2011/8

N2 - The publication of Elinor Ostrom's (1990) Governing the Commons fueled significant theoretical and empirical progress in the field of commons governance and collective action, most notably in the form of the Institutional Analysis and Development (IAD) framework. A central question within this literature is how trust is created, maintained, and potentially destroyed in the context of sustainability issues. While the commons literature has provided a deeper understanding of trust, most empirical work has been done in relatively simple settings that do not capture the complexity of many global, institutionally-complex dilemmas that we face today. This paper discusses how our understanding of trust in these more complex settings may be improved by considering how two broad categories of variables-belief systems and networks-influence trust.

AB - The publication of Elinor Ostrom's (1990) Governing the Commons fueled significant theoretical and empirical progress in the field of commons governance and collective action, most notably in the form of the Institutional Analysis and Development (IAD) framework. A central question within this literature is how trust is created, maintained, and potentially destroyed in the context of sustainability issues. While the commons literature has provided a deeper understanding of trust, most empirical work has been done in relatively simple settings that do not capture the complexity of many global, institutionally-complex dilemmas that we face today. This paper discusses how our understanding of trust in these more complex settings may be improved by considering how two broad categories of variables-belief systems and networks-influence trust.

KW - Advocacy coalition framework (ACF)

KW - Belief systems

KW - Common pool resources

KW - Homophily

KW - Information

KW - Institutional analysis and development (IAD)

KW - Networks

KW - Reputation

KW - Risk

KW - Sustainability

KW - Transitivity

KW - Trust

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80053604563&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80053604563&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 5

SP - 188

EP - 212

JO - International Journal of the Commons

JF - International Journal of the Commons

SN - 1875-0281

IS - 2

ER -