Initial experience of US Marine Corps forward resuscitative surgical system during operation Iraqi freedom

Lowell W. Chambers, Peter M Rhee, Bruce C. Baker, John Perciballi, Miguel Cubano, Michael Compeggie, Michael Nace, Harold R. Bohman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

98 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Hypothesis: Modern US Marine Corps (USMC) combat tactics are dynamic and nonlinear. While effective strategically, this can prolong the time it takes to transport the wounded to surgical capability, potentially worsening outcomes. To offset this, the USMC developed the Forward Resuscitative Surgical System (FRSS). By operating in close proximity to active combat units, these small, rapidly mobile trauma surgical teams can decrease the interval between wounding and arrival at surgical intervention with resultant improvement in outcomes. Design: Case series. Setting: Echelon 2 surgical units during the invasion phase of Operation Iraqi Freedom. Patients: Ninety combat casualties, consisting of 30 USMC and 60 Iraqi patients, were treated in the FRSS between March 21 and April 22, 2003. Interventions: Tactical surgical intervention consisting of selectively applied damage control or definitive trauma surgical procedures. Main Outcome Measures: Time to surgical intervention and outcome following treatment in the FRSS. Results: Ninety combat casualties with 170 injuries required 149 procedures by 6 FRSS teams. The USMC patients were received within a median of 1 hour of wounding with the critically injured being received within a median of 30 minutes. Fifty-three USMC personnel were killed in action and 3 died of wounds for a killed in action rate of 13.5% and a died of wounds rate of 0.8% during the invasion phase of Operation Iraqi Freedom. All Marines treated in the FRSS survived. Conclusion: The use of the FRSS in close proximity to the point of engagement during the initial, dynamic combat phase of Operation Iraqi Freedom prevented delays in surgical intervention of USMC combat casualties with resultant beneficial effects on patient outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)26-32
Number of pages7
JournalArchives of Surgery
Volume140
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

2003-2011 Iraq War
Military Personnel
Wounds and Injuries
Nonlinear Dynamics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Initial experience of US Marine Corps forward resuscitative surgical system during operation Iraqi freedom. / Chambers, Lowell W.; Rhee, Peter M; Baker, Bruce C.; Perciballi, John; Cubano, Miguel; Compeggie, Michael; Nace, Michael; Bohman, Harold R.

In: Archives of Surgery, Vol. 140, No. 1, 01.2005, p. 26-32.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Chambers, LW, Rhee, PM, Baker, BC, Perciballi, J, Cubano, M, Compeggie, M, Nace, M & Bohman, HR 2005, 'Initial experience of US Marine Corps forward resuscitative surgical system during operation Iraqi freedom', Archives of Surgery, vol. 140, no. 1, pp. 26-32. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.140.1.26
Chambers, Lowell W. ; Rhee, Peter M ; Baker, Bruce C. ; Perciballi, John ; Cubano, Miguel ; Compeggie, Michael ; Nace, Michael ; Bohman, Harold R. / Initial experience of US Marine Corps forward resuscitative surgical system during operation Iraqi freedom. In: Archives of Surgery. 2005 ; Vol. 140, No. 1. pp. 26-32.
@article{153fb098b874481aadc3b9ab56f7c7e2,
title = "Initial experience of US Marine Corps forward resuscitative surgical system during operation Iraqi freedom",
abstract = "Hypothesis: Modern US Marine Corps (USMC) combat tactics are dynamic and nonlinear. While effective strategically, this can prolong the time it takes to transport the wounded to surgical capability, potentially worsening outcomes. To offset this, the USMC developed the Forward Resuscitative Surgical System (FRSS). By operating in close proximity to active combat units, these small, rapidly mobile trauma surgical teams can decrease the interval between wounding and arrival at surgical intervention with resultant improvement in outcomes. Design: Case series. Setting: Echelon 2 surgical units during the invasion phase of Operation Iraqi Freedom. Patients: Ninety combat casualties, consisting of 30 USMC and 60 Iraqi patients, were treated in the FRSS between March 21 and April 22, 2003. Interventions: Tactical surgical intervention consisting of selectively applied damage control or definitive trauma surgical procedures. Main Outcome Measures: Time to surgical intervention and outcome following treatment in the FRSS. Results: Ninety combat casualties with 170 injuries required 149 procedures by 6 FRSS teams. The USMC patients were received within a median of 1 hour of wounding with the critically injured being received within a median of 30 minutes. Fifty-three USMC personnel were killed in action and 3 died of wounds for a killed in action rate of 13.5{\%} and a died of wounds rate of 0.8{\%} during the invasion phase of Operation Iraqi Freedom. All Marines treated in the FRSS survived. Conclusion: The use of the FRSS in close proximity to the point of engagement during the initial, dynamic combat phase of Operation Iraqi Freedom prevented delays in surgical intervention of USMC combat casualties with resultant beneficial effects on patient outcomes.",
author = "Chambers, {Lowell W.} and Rhee, {Peter M} and Baker, {Bruce C.} and John Perciballi and Miguel Cubano and Michael Compeggie and Michael Nace and Bohman, {Harold R.}",
year = "2005",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1001/archsurg.140.1.26",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "140",
pages = "26--32",
journal = "JAMA Surgery",
issn = "2168-6254",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Initial experience of US Marine Corps forward resuscitative surgical system during operation Iraqi freedom

AU - Chambers, Lowell W.

AU - Rhee, Peter M

AU - Baker, Bruce C.

AU - Perciballi, John

AU - Cubano, Miguel

AU - Compeggie, Michael

AU - Nace, Michael

AU - Bohman, Harold R.

PY - 2005/1

Y1 - 2005/1

N2 - Hypothesis: Modern US Marine Corps (USMC) combat tactics are dynamic and nonlinear. While effective strategically, this can prolong the time it takes to transport the wounded to surgical capability, potentially worsening outcomes. To offset this, the USMC developed the Forward Resuscitative Surgical System (FRSS). By operating in close proximity to active combat units, these small, rapidly mobile trauma surgical teams can decrease the interval between wounding and arrival at surgical intervention with resultant improvement in outcomes. Design: Case series. Setting: Echelon 2 surgical units during the invasion phase of Operation Iraqi Freedom. Patients: Ninety combat casualties, consisting of 30 USMC and 60 Iraqi patients, were treated in the FRSS between March 21 and April 22, 2003. Interventions: Tactical surgical intervention consisting of selectively applied damage control or definitive trauma surgical procedures. Main Outcome Measures: Time to surgical intervention and outcome following treatment in the FRSS. Results: Ninety combat casualties with 170 injuries required 149 procedures by 6 FRSS teams. The USMC patients were received within a median of 1 hour of wounding with the critically injured being received within a median of 30 minutes. Fifty-three USMC personnel were killed in action and 3 died of wounds for a killed in action rate of 13.5% and a died of wounds rate of 0.8% during the invasion phase of Operation Iraqi Freedom. All Marines treated in the FRSS survived. Conclusion: The use of the FRSS in close proximity to the point of engagement during the initial, dynamic combat phase of Operation Iraqi Freedom prevented delays in surgical intervention of USMC combat casualties with resultant beneficial effects on patient outcomes.

AB - Hypothesis: Modern US Marine Corps (USMC) combat tactics are dynamic and nonlinear. While effective strategically, this can prolong the time it takes to transport the wounded to surgical capability, potentially worsening outcomes. To offset this, the USMC developed the Forward Resuscitative Surgical System (FRSS). By operating in close proximity to active combat units, these small, rapidly mobile trauma surgical teams can decrease the interval between wounding and arrival at surgical intervention with resultant improvement in outcomes. Design: Case series. Setting: Echelon 2 surgical units during the invasion phase of Operation Iraqi Freedom. Patients: Ninety combat casualties, consisting of 30 USMC and 60 Iraqi patients, were treated in the FRSS between March 21 and April 22, 2003. Interventions: Tactical surgical intervention consisting of selectively applied damage control or definitive trauma surgical procedures. Main Outcome Measures: Time to surgical intervention and outcome following treatment in the FRSS. Results: Ninety combat casualties with 170 injuries required 149 procedures by 6 FRSS teams. The USMC patients were received within a median of 1 hour of wounding with the critically injured being received within a median of 30 minutes. Fifty-three USMC personnel were killed in action and 3 died of wounds for a killed in action rate of 13.5% and a died of wounds rate of 0.8% during the invasion phase of Operation Iraqi Freedom. All Marines treated in the FRSS survived. Conclusion: The use of the FRSS in close proximity to the point of engagement during the initial, dynamic combat phase of Operation Iraqi Freedom prevented delays in surgical intervention of USMC combat casualties with resultant beneficial effects on patient outcomes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=12144274260&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=12144274260&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1001/archsurg.140.1.26

DO - 10.1001/archsurg.140.1.26

M3 - Article

C2 - 15655202

AN - SCOPUS:12144274260

VL - 140

SP - 26

EP - 32

JO - JAMA Surgery

JF - JAMA Surgery

SN - 2168-6254

IS - 1

ER -