Initiation, response, follow-up and beyond

Analyzing dialogue around difficulty in a tutorial setting

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

With the advent of Common Core-based assessments, and resulting concerns about academic achievement, more and more students may require the level of instructional intensity tutoring affords. The extent of knowledge regarding the discourse that occurs within the tutoring context is, however, limited. As a result, it is difficult to envision and implement a protocol that incorporates responsive tutor/tutee interaction. This article describes an analysis of discourse patterns that occur as a tutor responded to student difficulty. The study is framed using Bakhtin’s concept of dialogue—the ways in which interactions are influenced by the joint speaker/listener identity that is characteristic of interlocutors—and the way this played out in a dialogic instructional context. Excerpts from eight previous tutoring studies served as a foundation for the present research. The primary data source for the analysis was start-to-finish audio-recordings of 40 hours of instruction with two fourth grade readers. After preliminary open coding, overarching categories such as questioning, providing information, and demonstrating strategy use—and more detailed codes within these categories—were applied to the transcripts. Major findings demonstrated that: (a) the tutor’s moves were varied and balanced and differed somewhat from child to child, (b) some interactional sequences appeared more effective than others depending on the topic and child, and (c) interactions in this setting differed in important ways from those found in the research literature. I argue here that the dialogic characteristics of tutor/tutee interactions served the children involved and should serve as the basis for additional tutoring protocols.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)A1-A26
JournalDialogic Pedagogy
Volume7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

tutor
dialogue
interaction
discourse
listener
academic achievement
recording
coding
student
school grade
instruction
Interaction
Tutor
Tutoring
Discourse
Tutees

Keywords

  • Dialogic pedagogy/teaching
  • Dialogue
  • Discourse analysis
  • Struggling readers
  • Triadic discourse
  • Tutoring

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

@article{5864b57ef7c84bc0a0aabe2caccd7463,
title = "Initiation, response, follow-up and beyond: Analyzing dialogue around difficulty in a tutorial setting",
abstract = "With the advent of Common Core-based assessments, and resulting concerns about academic achievement, more and more students may require the level of instructional intensity tutoring affords. The extent of knowledge regarding the discourse that occurs within the tutoring context is, however, limited. As a result, it is difficult to envision and implement a protocol that incorporates responsive tutor/tutee interaction. This article describes an analysis of discourse patterns that occur as a tutor responded to student difficulty. The study is framed using Bakhtin’s concept of dialogue—the ways in which interactions are influenced by the joint speaker/listener identity that is characteristic of interlocutors—and the way this played out in a dialogic instructional context. Excerpts from eight previous tutoring studies served as a foundation for the present research. The primary data source for the analysis was start-to-finish audio-recordings of 40 hours of instruction with two fourth grade readers. After preliminary open coding, overarching categories such as questioning, providing information, and demonstrating strategy use—and more detailed codes within these categories—were applied to the transcripts. Major findings demonstrated that: (a) the tutor’s moves were varied and balanced and differed somewhat from child to child, (b) some interactional sequences appeared more effective than others depending on the topic and child, and (c) interactions in this setting differed in important ways from those found in the research literature. I argue here that the dialogic characteristics of tutor/tutee interactions served the children involved and should serve as the basis for additional tutoring protocols.",
keywords = "Dialogic pedagogy/teaching, Dialogue, Discourse analysis, Struggling readers, Triadic discourse, Tutoring",
author = "Jaeger, {Elizabeth L}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.5195/dpj.2019.195",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
pages = "A1--A26",
journal = "Dialogic Pedagogy",
issn = "2325-3290",
publisher = "University Library System, University of Pittsburgh",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Initiation, response, follow-up and beyond

T2 - Analyzing dialogue around difficulty in a tutorial setting

AU - Jaeger, Elizabeth L

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - With the advent of Common Core-based assessments, and resulting concerns about academic achievement, more and more students may require the level of instructional intensity tutoring affords. The extent of knowledge regarding the discourse that occurs within the tutoring context is, however, limited. As a result, it is difficult to envision and implement a protocol that incorporates responsive tutor/tutee interaction. This article describes an analysis of discourse patterns that occur as a tutor responded to student difficulty. The study is framed using Bakhtin’s concept of dialogue—the ways in which interactions are influenced by the joint speaker/listener identity that is characteristic of interlocutors—and the way this played out in a dialogic instructional context. Excerpts from eight previous tutoring studies served as a foundation for the present research. The primary data source for the analysis was start-to-finish audio-recordings of 40 hours of instruction with two fourth grade readers. After preliminary open coding, overarching categories such as questioning, providing information, and demonstrating strategy use—and more detailed codes within these categories—were applied to the transcripts. Major findings demonstrated that: (a) the tutor’s moves were varied and balanced and differed somewhat from child to child, (b) some interactional sequences appeared more effective than others depending on the topic and child, and (c) interactions in this setting differed in important ways from those found in the research literature. I argue here that the dialogic characteristics of tutor/tutee interactions served the children involved and should serve as the basis for additional tutoring protocols.

AB - With the advent of Common Core-based assessments, and resulting concerns about academic achievement, more and more students may require the level of instructional intensity tutoring affords. The extent of knowledge regarding the discourse that occurs within the tutoring context is, however, limited. As a result, it is difficult to envision and implement a protocol that incorporates responsive tutor/tutee interaction. This article describes an analysis of discourse patterns that occur as a tutor responded to student difficulty. The study is framed using Bakhtin’s concept of dialogue—the ways in which interactions are influenced by the joint speaker/listener identity that is characteristic of interlocutors—and the way this played out in a dialogic instructional context. Excerpts from eight previous tutoring studies served as a foundation for the present research. The primary data source for the analysis was start-to-finish audio-recordings of 40 hours of instruction with two fourth grade readers. After preliminary open coding, overarching categories such as questioning, providing information, and demonstrating strategy use—and more detailed codes within these categories—were applied to the transcripts. Major findings demonstrated that: (a) the tutor’s moves were varied and balanced and differed somewhat from child to child, (b) some interactional sequences appeared more effective than others depending on the topic and child, and (c) interactions in this setting differed in important ways from those found in the research literature. I argue here that the dialogic characteristics of tutor/tutee interactions served the children involved and should serve as the basis for additional tutoring protocols.

KW - Dialogic pedagogy/teaching

KW - Dialogue

KW - Discourse analysis

KW - Struggling readers

KW - Triadic discourse

KW - Tutoring

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064641171&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85064641171&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5195/dpj.2019.195

DO - 10.5195/dpj.2019.195

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - A1-A26

JO - Dialogic Pedagogy

JF - Dialogic Pedagogy

SN - 2325-3290

ER -