Insights into alpine moraine development from cosmogenic 36Cl buildup dating

Marek G Zreda, Fred M. Phillips

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

45 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We have used cosmogenic 36Cl surface exposure dating to determine apparent construction ages of late Pleistocene moraines in the Sierra Nevada, the White Mountains, and the Wind River Range, all in the western United States. The inferred glacial chronologies from the various localities all exhibit certain characteristics: (1) Local records are fragmentary and deposits of some glacial advances are always missing; no location has deposits of all glaciations and no glacial advance is recorded at all locations. This is due either to unfavorable conditions for glacier development at some times or to obliteration of earlier deposits by later, more extensive glaciers. (2) Most moraines have young apparent exposure ages, with only a few older than the last glacial cycle. This may be due to young true ages of these deposits, erosion of moraine surfaces, or obliterative overlap and covering of older deposits by younger ones. (3) Many deposits that were previously correlated (e.g., based on their stratigraphic positions) are not correlative; they may represent different stades and, sometimes, even different glaciations. Similarly, some previously uncorrelated deposits have the same exposure ages and may be correlative. (4) Clusters of several distinct moraines of nearly the same age are present at most locations. These clusters suggest that alpine moraines are formed during short deposition episodes that last between several hundred and several thousand years.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)149-156
Number of pages8
JournalGeomorphology
Volume14
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1995

Fingerprint

moraine
glaciation
glacier
Last Glacial
chronology
dating
Pleistocene
erosion
mountain
river
exposure
young

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Earth-Surface Processes

Cite this

Insights into alpine moraine development from cosmogenic 36Cl buildup dating. / Zreda, Marek G; Phillips, Fred M.

In: Geomorphology, Vol. 14, No. 2, 1995, p. 149-156.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{092c19941c5041d9878b616efd3a77e3,
title = "Insights into alpine moraine development from cosmogenic 36Cl buildup dating",
abstract = "We have used cosmogenic 36Cl surface exposure dating to determine apparent construction ages of late Pleistocene moraines in the Sierra Nevada, the White Mountains, and the Wind River Range, all in the western United States. The inferred glacial chronologies from the various localities all exhibit certain characteristics: (1) Local records are fragmentary and deposits of some glacial advances are always missing; no location has deposits of all glaciations and no glacial advance is recorded at all locations. This is due either to unfavorable conditions for glacier development at some times or to obliteration of earlier deposits by later, more extensive glaciers. (2) Most moraines have young apparent exposure ages, with only a few older than the last glacial cycle. This may be due to young true ages of these deposits, erosion of moraine surfaces, or obliterative overlap and covering of older deposits by younger ones. (3) Many deposits that were previously correlated (e.g., based on their stratigraphic positions) are not correlative; they may represent different stades and, sometimes, even different glaciations. Similarly, some previously uncorrelated deposits have the same exposure ages and may be correlative. (4) Clusters of several distinct moraines of nearly the same age are present at most locations. These clusters suggest that alpine moraines are formed during short deposition episodes that last between several hundred and several thousand years.",
author = "Zreda, {Marek G} and Phillips, {Fred M.}",
year = "1995",
doi = "10.1016/0169-555X(95)00055-9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "149--156",
journal = "Geomorphology",
issn = "0169-555X",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Insights into alpine moraine development from cosmogenic 36Cl buildup dating

AU - Zreda, Marek G

AU - Phillips, Fred M.

PY - 1995

Y1 - 1995

N2 - We have used cosmogenic 36Cl surface exposure dating to determine apparent construction ages of late Pleistocene moraines in the Sierra Nevada, the White Mountains, and the Wind River Range, all in the western United States. The inferred glacial chronologies from the various localities all exhibit certain characteristics: (1) Local records are fragmentary and deposits of some glacial advances are always missing; no location has deposits of all glaciations and no glacial advance is recorded at all locations. This is due either to unfavorable conditions for glacier development at some times or to obliteration of earlier deposits by later, more extensive glaciers. (2) Most moraines have young apparent exposure ages, with only a few older than the last glacial cycle. This may be due to young true ages of these deposits, erosion of moraine surfaces, or obliterative overlap and covering of older deposits by younger ones. (3) Many deposits that were previously correlated (e.g., based on their stratigraphic positions) are not correlative; they may represent different stades and, sometimes, even different glaciations. Similarly, some previously uncorrelated deposits have the same exposure ages and may be correlative. (4) Clusters of several distinct moraines of nearly the same age are present at most locations. These clusters suggest that alpine moraines are formed during short deposition episodes that last between several hundred and several thousand years.

AB - We have used cosmogenic 36Cl surface exposure dating to determine apparent construction ages of late Pleistocene moraines in the Sierra Nevada, the White Mountains, and the Wind River Range, all in the western United States. The inferred glacial chronologies from the various localities all exhibit certain characteristics: (1) Local records are fragmentary and deposits of some glacial advances are always missing; no location has deposits of all glaciations and no glacial advance is recorded at all locations. This is due either to unfavorable conditions for glacier development at some times or to obliteration of earlier deposits by later, more extensive glaciers. (2) Most moraines have young apparent exposure ages, with only a few older than the last glacial cycle. This may be due to young true ages of these deposits, erosion of moraine surfaces, or obliterative overlap and covering of older deposits by younger ones. (3) Many deposits that were previously correlated (e.g., based on their stratigraphic positions) are not correlative; they may represent different stades and, sometimes, even different glaciations. Similarly, some previously uncorrelated deposits have the same exposure ages and may be correlative. (4) Clusters of several distinct moraines of nearly the same age are present at most locations. These clusters suggest that alpine moraines are formed during short deposition episodes that last between several hundred and several thousand years.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029510510&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029510510&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0169-555X(95)00055-9

DO - 10.1016/0169-555X(95)00055-9

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 149

EP - 156

JO - Geomorphology

JF - Geomorphology

SN - 0169-555X

IS - 2

ER -