Integrating remote sensing and ground methods to estimate evapotranspiration

Edward P. Glenn, Alfredo R. Huete, Pamela L. Nagler, Katherine Hirschboeck, Paul W Brown

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

186 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Evapotranspiraton (ET) is the second largest term in the terrestrial water budget after precipitation, and ET is expected to increase with global warming. ET studies are relevant to the plant sciences because over 80% of terrestrial ET is due to transpiration by plants. Remote sensing is the only feasible means for projecting ET over large landscape units. In the past decade or so, new ground and remote sensing tools have dramatically increased our ability to measure ET at the plot scale and to scale it over larger regions. Moisture flux towers and micrometeorological stations have been deployed in numerous natural and agricultural biomes and provide continuous measurements of actual ET or potential ET with an accuracy or uncertainty of 10-30%. These measurements can be scaled to larger landscape units using remotely-sensed vegetation indices (VIs), Land Surface Temperature (LST), and other satellite data. Two types of methods have been developed. Empirical methods use time-series VIs and micrometeorological data to project ET measured on the ground to larger landscape units. Physically-based methods use remote sensing data to determine the components of the surface energy balance, including latent heat flux, which determines ET. Errors in predicting ET by both types of methods are within the error bounds of the flux towers by which they are calibrated or validated. However, the error bounds need to be reduced to 10% or less for applications that require precise wide-area ET estimates. The high fidelity between ET and VIs over agricultural fields and natural ecosystems where precise ground estimates of ET are available suggests that this might be an achievable goal if ground methods for measuring ET continue to improve.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)139-168
Number of pages30
JournalCritical Reviews in Plant Sciences
Volume26
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2007

Fingerprint

evapotranspiration
remote sensing
methodology
ecosystems
water balance
energy balance
global warming
surface temperature
time series analysis
transpiration
uncertainty
heat
vegetation index

Keywords

  • Ecohydrology
  • Evaporation
  • Flux towers
  • Transpiration

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Plant Science

Cite this

Integrating remote sensing and ground methods to estimate evapotranspiration. / Glenn, Edward P.; Huete, Alfredo R.; Nagler, Pamela L.; Hirschboeck, Katherine; Brown, Paul W.

In: Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, Vol. 26, No. 3, 05.2007, p. 139-168.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Glenn, Edward P. ; Huete, Alfredo R. ; Nagler, Pamela L. ; Hirschboeck, Katherine ; Brown, Paul W. / Integrating remote sensing and ground methods to estimate evapotranspiration. In: Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences. 2007 ; Vol. 26, No. 3. pp. 139-168.
@article{c11299c92cc74d3bb9d93b7704381bcc,
title = "Integrating remote sensing and ground methods to estimate evapotranspiration",
abstract = "Evapotranspiraton (ET) is the second largest term in the terrestrial water budget after precipitation, and ET is expected to increase with global warming. ET studies are relevant to the plant sciences because over 80{\%} of terrestrial ET is due to transpiration by plants. Remote sensing is the only feasible means for projecting ET over large landscape units. In the past decade or so, new ground and remote sensing tools have dramatically increased our ability to measure ET at the plot scale and to scale it over larger regions. Moisture flux towers and micrometeorological stations have been deployed in numerous natural and agricultural biomes and provide continuous measurements of actual ET or potential ET with an accuracy or uncertainty of 10-30{\%}. These measurements can be scaled to larger landscape units using remotely-sensed vegetation indices (VIs), Land Surface Temperature (LST), and other satellite data. Two types of methods have been developed. Empirical methods use time-series VIs and micrometeorological data to project ET measured on the ground to larger landscape units. Physically-based methods use remote sensing data to determine the components of the surface energy balance, including latent heat flux, which determines ET. Errors in predicting ET by both types of methods are within the error bounds of the flux towers by which they are calibrated or validated. However, the error bounds need to be reduced to 10{\%} or less for applications that require precise wide-area ET estimates. The high fidelity between ET and VIs over agricultural fields and natural ecosystems where precise ground estimates of ET are available suggests that this might be an achievable goal if ground methods for measuring ET continue to improve.",
keywords = "Ecohydrology, Evaporation, Flux towers, Transpiration",
author = "Glenn, {Edward P.} and Huete, {Alfredo R.} and Nagler, {Pamela L.} and Katherine Hirschboeck and Brown, {Paul W}",
year = "2007",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1080/07352680701402503",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "139--168",
journal = "Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences",
issn = "0735-2689",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Integrating remote sensing and ground methods to estimate evapotranspiration

AU - Glenn, Edward P.

AU - Huete, Alfredo R.

AU - Nagler, Pamela L.

AU - Hirschboeck, Katherine

AU - Brown, Paul W

PY - 2007/5

Y1 - 2007/5

N2 - Evapotranspiraton (ET) is the second largest term in the terrestrial water budget after precipitation, and ET is expected to increase with global warming. ET studies are relevant to the plant sciences because over 80% of terrestrial ET is due to transpiration by plants. Remote sensing is the only feasible means for projecting ET over large landscape units. In the past decade or so, new ground and remote sensing tools have dramatically increased our ability to measure ET at the plot scale and to scale it over larger regions. Moisture flux towers and micrometeorological stations have been deployed in numerous natural and agricultural biomes and provide continuous measurements of actual ET or potential ET with an accuracy or uncertainty of 10-30%. These measurements can be scaled to larger landscape units using remotely-sensed vegetation indices (VIs), Land Surface Temperature (LST), and other satellite data. Two types of methods have been developed. Empirical methods use time-series VIs and micrometeorological data to project ET measured on the ground to larger landscape units. Physically-based methods use remote sensing data to determine the components of the surface energy balance, including latent heat flux, which determines ET. Errors in predicting ET by both types of methods are within the error bounds of the flux towers by which they are calibrated or validated. However, the error bounds need to be reduced to 10% or less for applications that require precise wide-area ET estimates. The high fidelity between ET and VIs over agricultural fields and natural ecosystems where precise ground estimates of ET are available suggests that this might be an achievable goal if ground methods for measuring ET continue to improve.

AB - Evapotranspiraton (ET) is the second largest term in the terrestrial water budget after precipitation, and ET is expected to increase with global warming. ET studies are relevant to the plant sciences because over 80% of terrestrial ET is due to transpiration by plants. Remote sensing is the only feasible means for projecting ET over large landscape units. In the past decade or so, new ground and remote sensing tools have dramatically increased our ability to measure ET at the plot scale and to scale it over larger regions. Moisture flux towers and micrometeorological stations have been deployed in numerous natural and agricultural biomes and provide continuous measurements of actual ET or potential ET with an accuracy or uncertainty of 10-30%. These measurements can be scaled to larger landscape units using remotely-sensed vegetation indices (VIs), Land Surface Temperature (LST), and other satellite data. Two types of methods have been developed. Empirical methods use time-series VIs and micrometeorological data to project ET measured on the ground to larger landscape units. Physically-based methods use remote sensing data to determine the components of the surface energy balance, including latent heat flux, which determines ET. Errors in predicting ET by both types of methods are within the error bounds of the flux towers by which they are calibrated or validated. However, the error bounds need to be reduced to 10% or less for applications that require precise wide-area ET estimates. The high fidelity between ET and VIs over agricultural fields and natural ecosystems where precise ground estimates of ET are available suggests that this might be an achievable goal if ground methods for measuring ET continue to improve.

KW - Ecohydrology

KW - Evaporation

KW - Flux towers

KW - Transpiration

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34250155262&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34250155262&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/07352680701402503

DO - 10.1080/07352680701402503

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:34250155262

VL - 26

SP - 139

EP - 168

JO - Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences

JF - Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences

SN - 0735-2689

IS - 3

ER -