Integrating soil ecological knowledge into restoration management

Liam Heneghan, Susan P. Miller, Sara Baer, Mac A. Callaham, James Montgomery, Mitchell Pavao-Zuckerman, Charles C. Rhoades, Sarah Richardson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

108 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The variability in the type of ecosystem degradation and the specificity of restoration goals can challenge restorationists' ability to generalize about approaches that lead to restoration success. The discipline of soil ecology, which emphasizes both soil organisms and ecosystem processes, has generated a body of knowledge that can be generally useful in improving the outcomes of restoration despite this variability. Here, we propose that the usefulness of this soil ecological knowledge (SEK) for restoration is best considered in the context of the severity of the original perturbation, the goals of the project, and the resilience of the ecosystem to disturbance. A straightforward manipulation of single physical, chemical, or biological components of the soil system can be useful in the restoration of a site, especially when the restoration goal is loosely defined in terms of the species and processes that management seeks to achieve. These single-factor manipulations may in fact produce cascading effects on several ecosystem attributes and can result in unintended recovery trajectories. When complex outcomes are desired, intentional and holistic integration of all aspects of the soil knowledge is necessary. We provide a short roster of examples to illustrate that SEK benefits management and restoration of ecosystems and suggest areas for future research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)608-617
Number of pages10
JournalRestoration Ecology
Volume16
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2008

Fingerprint

soil
soil ecology
ecosystems
ecological restoration
ecosystem management
ecosystem
trajectories
soil ecosystem
degradation
restoration
trajectory
perturbation
ecology
disturbance
ecological resilience
soil biota
soil ecosystems

Keywords

  • Ecosystem processes
  • Feedbacks
  • Soil ecology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Ecology
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation

Cite this

Heneghan, L., Miller, S. P., Baer, S., Callaham, M. A., Montgomery, J., Pavao-Zuckerman, M., ... Richardson, S. (2008). Integrating soil ecological knowledge into restoration management. Restoration Ecology, 16(4), 608-617. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100X.2008.00477.x

Integrating soil ecological knowledge into restoration management. / Heneghan, Liam; Miller, Susan P.; Baer, Sara; Callaham, Mac A.; Montgomery, James; Pavao-Zuckerman, Mitchell; Rhoades, Charles C.; Richardson, Sarah.

In: Restoration Ecology, Vol. 16, No. 4, 2008, p. 608-617.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Heneghan, L, Miller, SP, Baer, S, Callaham, MA, Montgomery, J, Pavao-Zuckerman, M, Rhoades, CC & Richardson, S 2008, 'Integrating soil ecological knowledge into restoration management', Restoration Ecology, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 608-617. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100X.2008.00477.x
Heneghan, Liam ; Miller, Susan P. ; Baer, Sara ; Callaham, Mac A. ; Montgomery, James ; Pavao-Zuckerman, Mitchell ; Rhoades, Charles C. ; Richardson, Sarah. / Integrating soil ecological knowledge into restoration management. In: Restoration Ecology. 2008 ; Vol. 16, No. 4. pp. 608-617.
@article{7606e4f6ec774f8d88ced459a7d480e3,
title = "Integrating soil ecological knowledge into restoration management",
abstract = "The variability in the type of ecosystem degradation and the specificity of restoration goals can challenge restorationists' ability to generalize about approaches that lead to restoration success. The discipline of soil ecology, which emphasizes both soil organisms and ecosystem processes, has generated a body of knowledge that can be generally useful in improving the outcomes of restoration despite this variability. Here, we propose that the usefulness of this soil ecological knowledge (SEK) for restoration is best considered in the context of the severity of the original perturbation, the goals of the project, and the resilience of the ecosystem to disturbance. A straightforward manipulation of single physical, chemical, or biological components of the soil system can be useful in the restoration of a site, especially when the restoration goal is loosely defined in terms of the species and processes that management seeks to achieve. These single-factor manipulations may in fact produce cascading effects on several ecosystem attributes and can result in unintended recovery trajectories. When complex outcomes are desired, intentional and holistic integration of all aspects of the soil knowledge is necessary. We provide a short roster of examples to illustrate that SEK benefits management and restoration of ecosystems and suggest areas for future research.",
keywords = "Ecosystem processes, Feedbacks, Soil ecology",
author = "Liam Heneghan and Miller, {Susan P.} and Sara Baer and Callaham, {Mac A.} and James Montgomery and Mitchell Pavao-Zuckerman and Rhoades, {Charles C.} and Sarah Richardson",
year = "2008",
doi = "10.1111/j.1526-100X.2008.00477.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "608--617",
journal = "Restoration Ecology",
issn = "1061-2971",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Integrating soil ecological knowledge into restoration management

AU - Heneghan, Liam

AU - Miller, Susan P.

AU - Baer, Sara

AU - Callaham, Mac A.

AU - Montgomery, James

AU - Pavao-Zuckerman, Mitchell

AU - Rhoades, Charles C.

AU - Richardson, Sarah

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - The variability in the type of ecosystem degradation and the specificity of restoration goals can challenge restorationists' ability to generalize about approaches that lead to restoration success. The discipline of soil ecology, which emphasizes both soil organisms and ecosystem processes, has generated a body of knowledge that can be generally useful in improving the outcomes of restoration despite this variability. Here, we propose that the usefulness of this soil ecological knowledge (SEK) for restoration is best considered in the context of the severity of the original perturbation, the goals of the project, and the resilience of the ecosystem to disturbance. A straightforward manipulation of single physical, chemical, or biological components of the soil system can be useful in the restoration of a site, especially when the restoration goal is loosely defined in terms of the species and processes that management seeks to achieve. These single-factor manipulations may in fact produce cascading effects on several ecosystem attributes and can result in unintended recovery trajectories. When complex outcomes are desired, intentional and holistic integration of all aspects of the soil knowledge is necessary. We provide a short roster of examples to illustrate that SEK benefits management and restoration of ecosystems and suggest areas for future research.

AB - The variability in the type of ecosystem degradation and the specificity of restoration goals can challenge restorationists' ability to generalize about approaches that lead to restoration success. The discipline of soil ecology, which emphasizes both soil organisms and ecosystem processes, has generated a body of knowledge that can be generally useful in improving the outcomes of restoration despite this variability. Here, we propose that the usefulness of this soil ecological knowledge (SEK) for restoration is best considered in the context of the severity of the original perturbation, the goals of the project, and the resilience of the ecosystem to disturbance. A straightforward manipulation of single physical, chemical, or biological components of the soil system can be useful in the restoration of a site, especially when the restoration goal is loosely defined in terms of the species and processes that management seeks to achieve. These single-factor manipulations may in fact produce cascading effects on several ecosystem attributes and can result in unintended recovery trajectories. When complex outcomes are desired, intentional and holistic integration of all aspects of the soil knowledge is necessary. We provide a short roster of examples to illustrate that SEK benefits management and restoration of ecosystems and suggest areas for future research.

KW - Ecosystem processes

KW - Feedbacks

KW - Soil ecology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=57049102390&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=57049102390&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2008.00477.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2008.00477.x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:57049102390

VL - 16

SP - 608

EP - 617

JO - Restoration Ecology

JF - Restoration Ecology

SN - 1061-2971

IS - 4

ER -