Intensity non-uniformity correction using N3 on 3-T scanners with multichannel phased array coils

Richard G. Boyes, Jeff L. Gunter, Chris Frost, Andrew L. Janke, Thomas Yeatman, Derek L G Hill, Matt A. Bernstein, Paul M. Thompson, Michael W. Weiner, Norbert Schuff, Gene E Alexander, Ronald J. Killiany, Charles DeCarli, Clifford R. Jack, Nick C. Fox

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

94 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Measures of structural brain change based on longitudinal MR imaging are increasingly important but can be degraded by intensity non-uniformity. This non-uniformity can be more pronounced at higher field strengths, or when using multichannel receiver coils. We assessed the ability of the non-parametric non-uniform intensity normalization (N3) technique to correct non-uniformity in 72 volumetric brain MR scans from the preparatory phase of the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI). Normal elderly subjects (n = 18) were scanned on different 3-T scanners with a multichannel phased array receiver coil at baseline, using magnetization prepared rapid gradient echo (MP-RAGE) and spoiled gradient echo (SPGR) pulse sequences, and again 2 weeks later. When applying N3, we used five brain masks of varying accuracy and four spline smoothing distances (d = 50, 100, 150 and 200 mm) to ascertain which combination of parameters optimally reduces the non-uniformity. We used the normalized white matter intensity variance (standard deviation/mean) to ascertain quantitatively the correction for a single scan; we used the variance of the normalized difference image to assess quantitatively the consistency of the correction over time from registered scan pairs. Our results showed statistically significant (p < 0.01) improvement in uniformity for individual scans and reduction in the normalized difference image variance when using masks that identified distinct brain tissue classes, and when using smaller spline smoothing distances (e.g., 50-100 mm) for both MP-RAGE and SPGR pulse sequences. These optimized settings may assist future large-scale studies where 3-T scanners and phased array receiver coils are used, such as ADNI, so that intensity non-uniformity does not influence the power of MR imaging to detect disease progression and the factors that influence it.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1752-1762
Number of pages11
JournalNeuroImage
Volume39
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 15 2008

Fingerprint

Brain
Masks
Neuroimaging
Alzheimer Disease
Aptitude
Disease Progression
White Matter
Power (Psychology)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Neurology

Cite this

Boyes, R. G., Gunter, J. L., Frost, C., Janke, A. L., Yeatman, T., Hill, D. L. G., ... Fox, N. C. (2008). Intensity non-uniformity correction using N3 on 3-T scanners with multichannel phased array coils. NeuroImage, 39(4), 1752-1762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.10.026

Intensity non-uniformity correction using N3 on 3-T scanners with multichannel phased array coils. / Boyes, Richard G.; Gunter, Jeff L.; Frost, Chris; Janke, Andrew L.; Yeatman, Thomas; Hill, Derek L G; Bernstein, Matt A.; Thompson, Paul M.; Weiner, Michael W.; Schuff, Norbert; Alexander, Gene E; Killiany, Ronald J.; DeCarli, Charles; Jack, Clifford R.; Fox, Nick C.

In: NeuroImage, Vol. 39, No. 4, 15.02.2008, p. 1752-1762.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Boyes, RG, Gunter, JL, Frost, C, Janke, AL, Yeatman, T, Hill, DLG, Bernstein, MA, Thompson, PM, Weiner, MW, Schuff, N, Alexander, GE, Killiany, RJ, DeCarli, C, Jack, CR & Fox, NC 2008, 'Intensity non-uniformity correction using N3 on 3-T scanners with multichannel phased array coils', NeuroImage, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 1752-1762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.10.026
Boyes, Richard G. ; Gunter, Jeff L. ; Frost, Chris ; Janke, Andrew L. ; Yeatman, Thomas ; Hill, Derek L G ; Bernstein, Matt A. ; Thompson, Paul M. ; Weiner, Michael W. ; Schuff, Norbert ; Alexander, Gene E ; Killiany, Ronald J. ; DeCarli, Charles ; Jack, Clifford R. ; Fox, Nick C. / Intensity non-uniformity correction using N3 on 3-T scanners with multichannel phased array coils. In: NeuroImage. 2008 ; Vol. 39, No. 4. pp. 1752-1762.
@article{41f15b1520564b13a406c53db2d8e035,
title = "Intensity non-uniformity correction using N3 on 3-T scanners with multichannel phased array coils",
abstract = "Measures of structural brain change based on longitudinal MR imaging are increasingly important but can be degraded by intensity non-uniformity. This non-uniformity can be more pronounced at higher field strengths, or when using multichannel receiver coils. We assessed the ability of the non-parametric non-uniform intensity normalization (N3) technique to correct non-uniformity in 72 volumetric brain MR scans from the preparatory phase of the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI). Normal elderly subjects (n = 18) were scanned on different 3-T scanners with a multichannel phased array receiver coil at baseline, using magnetization prepared rapid gradient echo (MP-RAGE) and spoiled gradient echo (SPGR) pulse sequences, and again 2 weeks later. When applying N3, we used five brain masks of varying accuracy and four spline smoothing distances (d = 50, 100, 150 and 200 mm) to ascertain which combination of parameters optimally reduces the non-uniformity. We used the normalized white matter intensity variance (standard deviation/mean) to ascertain quantitatively the correction for a single scan; we used the variance of the normalized difference image to assess quantitatively the consistency of the correction over time from registered scan pairs. Our results showed statistically significant (p < 0.01) improvement in uniformity for individual scans and reduction in the normalized difference image variance when using masks that identified distinct brain tissue classes, and when using smaller spline smoothing distances (e.g., 50-100 mm) for both MP-RAGE and SPGR pulse sequences. These optimized settings may assist future large-scale studies where 3-T scanners and phased array receiver coils are used, such as ADNI, so that intensity non-uniformity does not influence the power of MR imaging to detect disease progression and the factors that influence it.",
author = "Boyes, {Richard G.} and Gunter, {Jeff L.} and Chris Frost and Janke, {Andrew L.} and Thomas Yeatman and Hill, {Derek L G} and Bernstein, {Matt A.} and Thompson, {Paul M.} and Weiner, {Michael W.} and Norbert Schuff and Alexander, {Gene E} and Killiany, {Ronald J.} and Charles DeCarli and Jack, {Clifford R.} and Fox, {Nick C.}",
year = "2008",
month = "2",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.10.026",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "39",
pages = "1752--1762",
journal = "NeuroImage",
issn = "1053-8119",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Intensity non-uniformity correction using N3 on 3-T scanners with multichannel phased array coils

AU - Boyes, Richard G.

AU - Gunter, Jeff L.

AU - Frost, Chris

AU - Janke, Andrew L.

AU - Yeatman, Thomas

AU - Hill, Derek L G

AU - Bernstein, Matt A.

AU - Thompson, Paul M.

AU - Weiner, Michael W.

AU - Schuff, Norbert

AU - Alexander, Gene E

AU - Killiany, Ronald J.

AU - DeCarli, Charles

AU - Jack, Clifford R.

AU - Fox, Nick C.

PY - 2008/2/15

Y1 - 2008/2/15

N2 - Measures of structural brain change based on longitudinal MR imaging are increasingly important but can be degraded by intensity non-uniformity. This non-uniformity can be more pronounced at higher field strengths, or when using multichannel receiver coils. We assessed the ability of the non-parametric non-uniform intensity normalization (N3) technique to correct non-uniformity in 72 volumetric brain MR scans from the preparatory phase of the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI). Normal elderly subjects (n = 18) were scanned on different 3-T scanners with a multichannel phased array receiver coil at baseline, using magnetization prepared rapid gradient echo (MP-RAGE) and spoiled gradient echo (SPGR) pulse sequences, and again 2 weeks later. When applying N3, we used five brain masks of varying accuracy and four spline smoothing distances (d = 50, 100, 150 and 200 mm) to ascertain which combination of parameters optimally reduces the non-uniformity. We used the normalized white matter intensity variance (standard deviation/mean) to ascertain quantitatively the correction for a single scan; we used the variance of the normalized difference image to assess quantitatively the consistency of the correction over time from registered scan pairs. Our results showed statistically significant (p < 0.01) improvement in uniformity for individual scans and reduction in the normalized difference image variance when using masks that identified distinct brain tissue classes, and when using smaller spline smoothing distances (e.g., 50-100 mm) for both MP-RAGE and SPGR pulse sequences. These optimized settings may assist future large-scale studies where 3-T scanners and phased array receiver coils are used, such as ADNI, so that intensity non-uniformity does not influence the power of MR imaging to detect disease progression and the factors that influence it.

AB - Measures of structural brain change based on longitudinal MR imaging are increasingly important but can be degraded by intensity non-uniformity. This non-uniformity can be more pronounced at higher field strengths, or when using multichannel receiver coils. We assessed the ability of the non-parametric non-uniform intensity normalization (N3) technique to correct non-uniformity in 72 volumetric brain MR scans from the preparatory phase of the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI). Normal elderly subjects (n = 18) were scanned on different 3-T scanners with a multichannel phased array receiver coil at baseline, using magnetization prepared rapid gradient echo (MP-RAGE) and spoiled gradient echo (SPGR) pulse sequences, and again 2 weeks later. When applying N3, we used five brain masks of varying accuracy and four spline smoothing distances (d = 50, 100, 150 and 200 mm) to ascertain which combination of parameters optimally reduces the non-uniformity. We used the normalized white matter intensity variance (standard deviation/mean) to ascertain quantitatively the correction for a single scan; we used the variance of the normalized difference image to assess quantitatively the consistency of the correction over time from registered scan pairs. Our results showed statistically significant (p < 0.01) improvement in uniformity for individual scans and reduction in the normalized difference image variance when using masks that identified distinct brain tissue classes, and when using smaller spline smoothing distances (e.g., 50-100 mm) for both MP-RAGE and SPGR pulse sequences. These optimized settings may assist future large-scale studies where 3-T scanners and phased array receiver coils are used, such as ADNI, so that intensity non-uniformity does not influence the power of MR imaging to detect disease progression and the factors that influence it.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=38749114308&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=38749114308&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.10.026

DO - 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.10.026

M3 - Article

C2 - 18063391

AN - SCOPUS:38749114308

VL - 39

SP - 1752

EP - 1762

JO - NeuroImage

JF - NeuroImage

SN - 1053-8119

IS - 4

ER -