Intentional forgetting diminishes memory for continuous events

Jonathan M. Fawcett, Tracy L. Taylor, Lynn Nadel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In a novel event method directed forgetting task, instructions to Remember (R) or Forget (F) were integrated throughout the presentation of four videos depicting common events (e.g., baking cookies). Participants responded more accurately to cued recall questions (E1) and true/false statements (E2-4) regarding R segments than F segments. This was true even when forced to attend to F segments by virtue of having to perform concurrent discrimination (E2) or conceptual segmentation (E3) tasks. The final experiment (E5) demonstrated a larger R >F difference for specific true/false statements (the woman added three cups of flour) than for general true/false statements (the woman added flour) suggesting that participants likely encoded and retained at least a general representation of the events they had intended to forget, even though this representation was not as specific as the representation of events they had intended to remember.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)675-694
Number of pages20
JournalMemory
Volume21
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2013

Fingerprint

Flour
Forgetting
Discrimination (Psychology)

Keywords

  • Cognition
  • Events
  • Intentional forgetting
  • Memory

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Intentional forgetting diminishes memory for continuous events. / Fawcett, Jonathan M.; Taylor, Tracy L.; Nadel, Lynn.

In: Memory, Vol. 21, No. 6, 08.2013, p. 675-694.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Fawcett, Jonathan M. ; Taylor, Tracy L. ; Nadel, Lynn. / Intentional forgetting diminishes memory for continuous events. In: Memory. 2013 ; Vol. 21, No. 6. pp. 675-694.
@article{3fb5be9d94fc4bb7b917e100a03603ae,
title = "Intentional forgetting diminishes memory for continuous events",
abstract = "In a novel event method directed forgetting task, instructions to Remember (R) or Forget (F) were integrated throughout the presentation of four videos depicting common events (e.g., baking cookies). Participants responded more accurately to cued recall questions (E1) and true/false statements (E2-4) regarding R segments than F segments. This was true even when forced to attend to F segments by virtue of having to perform concurrent discrimination (E2) or conceptual segmentation (E3) tasks. The final experiment (E5) demonstrated a larger R >F difference for specific true/false statements (the woman added three cups of flour) than for general true/false statements (the woman added flour) suggesting that participants likely encoded and retained at least a general representation of the events they had intended to forget, even though this representation was not as specific as the representation of events they had intended to remember.",
keywords = "Cognition, Events, Intentional forgetting, Memory",
author = "Fawcett, {Jonathan M.} and Taylor, {Tracy L.} and Lynn Nadel",
year = "2013",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1080/09658211.2012.748078",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "675--694",
journal = "Memory",
issn = "0965-8211",
publisher = "Psychology Press Ltd",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Intentional forgetting diminishes memory for continuous events

AU - Fawcett, Jonathan M.

AU - Taylor, Tracy L.

AU - Nadel, Lynn

PY - 2013/8

Y1 - 2013/8

N2 - In a novel event method directed forgetting task, instructions to Remember (R) or Forget (F) were integrated throughout the presentation of four videos depicting common events (e.g., baking cookies). Participants responded more accurately to cued recall questions (E1) and true/false statements (E2-4) regarding R segments than F segments. This was true even when forced to attend to F segments by virtue of having to perform concurrent discrimination (E2) or conceptual segmentation (E3) tasks. The final experiment (E5) demonstrated a larger R >F difference for specific true/false statements (the woman added three cups of flour) than for general true/false statements (the woman added flour) suggesting that participants likely encoded and retained at least a general representation of the events they had intended to forget, even though this representation was not as specific as the representation of events they had intended to remember.

AB - In a novel event method directed forgetting task, instructions to Remember (R) or Forget (F) were integrated throughout the presentation of four videos depicting common events (e.g., baking cookies). Participants responded more accurately to cued recall questions (E1) and true/false statements (E2-4) regarding R segments than F segments. This was true even when forced to attend to F segments by virtue of having to perform concurrent discrimination (E2) or conceptual segmentation (E3) tasks. The final experiment (E5) demonstrated a larger R >F difference for specific true/false statements (the woman added three cups of flour) than for general true/false statements (the woman added flour) suggesting that participants likely encoded and retained at least a general representation of the events they had intended to forget, even though this representation was not as specific as the representation of events they had intended to remember.

KW - Cognition

KW - Events

KW - Intentional forgetting

KW - Memory

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84880954396&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84880954396&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/09658211.2012.748078

DO - 10.1080/09658211.2012.748078

M3 - Article

C2 - 23301998

AN - SCOPUS:84880954396

VL - 21

SP - 675

EP - 694

JO - Memory

JF - Memory

SN - 0965-8211

IS - 6

ER -