Interactive versus stand-alone group decision support systems for stakeholder identification and assumption surfacing in small groups

Annette C. Easton, Douglas R. Vogel, Jay F Nunamaker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

As we begin to see evidence that Group Decision Support Systems can be beneficial, it becomes increasingly important to investigate the effect of different GDSS designs on decision making processes. This study investigated the effect of a GDSS based on the Strategic Assumption Surfacing and Testing model for strategic planning impact analysis. A controlled laboratory experiment compared the results of 4-person groups that had either Stand-Alone GDSS support (one personal computer per group) or Interactive GDSS support (4 networked personal computers per group). Measures were taken on decision outcomes (quality, time and satisfaction with the outcomes) and decision process variables (quantity of unique alternatives, distribution of individual participation, and satisfaction with the process). We found that the interactive GDSS groups generated a higher number of unique ideas and had more even participation rates. However they were less satisfied with both the process and the outcomes. We also found no significant difference between the groups in terms of decision quality and decision time.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)159-168
Number of pages10
JournalDecision Support Systems
Volume8
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1992

Fingerprint

Hard facing
Microcomputers
Decision support systems
Personal computers
Strategic planning
Decision Making
Decision making
Testing
Experiments
Group decision support systems
Stakeholders
Strategic Planning
Personal Computer
Participation

Keywords

  • Computer supported collaborative work
  • Computer supported groups
  • Computer supported work
  • Group decision support systems
  • Group process and outcomes
  • stakeholder analysis. Computer supported meetings
  • Strategic planning.

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Management Information Systems
  • Information Systems
  • Information Systems and Management

Cite this

Interactive versus stand-alone group decision support systems for stakeholder identification and assumption surfacing in small groups. / Easton, Annette C.; Vogel, Douglas R.; Nunamaker, Jay F.

In: Decision Support Systems, Vol. 8, No. 2, 1992, p. 159-168.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1021eda4e8c7424497c47a5843790383,
title = "Interactive versus stand-alone group decision support systems for stakeholder identification and assumption surfacing in small groups",
abstract = "As we begin to see evidence that Group Decision Support Systems can be beneficial, it becomes increasingly important to investigate the effect of different GDSS designs on decision making processes. This study investigated the effect of a GDSS based on the Strategic Assumption Surfacing and Testing model for strategic planning impact analysis. A controlled laboratory experiment compared the results of 4-person groups that had either Stand-Alone GDSS support (one personal computer per group) or Interactive GDSS support (4 networked personal computers per group). Measures were taken on decision outcomes (quality, time and satisfaction with the outcomes) and decision process variables (quantity of unique alternatives, distribution of individual participation, and satisfaction with the process). We found that the interactive GDSS groups generated a higher number of unique ideas and had more even participation rates. However they were less satisfied with both the process and the outcomes. We also found no significant difference between the groups in terms of decision quality and decision time.",
keywords = "Computer supported collaborative work, Computer supported groups, Computer supported work, Group decision support systems, Group process and outcomes, stakeholder analysis. Computer supported meetings, Strategic planning.",
author = "Easton, {Annette C.} and Vogel, {Douglas R.} and Nunamaker, {Jay F}",
year = "1992",
doi = "10.1016/0167-9236(92)90006-B",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
pages = "159--168",
journal = "Decision Support Systems",
issn = "0167-9236",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Interactive versus stand-alone group decision support systems for stakeholder identification and assumption surfacing in small groups

AU - Easton, Annette C.

AU - Vogel, Douglas R.

AU - Nunamaker, Jay F

PY - 1992

Y1 - 1992

N2 - As we begin to see evidence that Group Decision Support Systems can be beneficial, it becomes increasingly important to investigate the effect of different GDSS designs on decision making processes. This study investigated the effect of a GDSS based on the Strategic Assumption Surfacing and Testing model for strategic planning impact analysis. A controlled laboratory experiment compared the results of 4-person groups that had either Stand-Alone GDSS support (one personal computer per group) or Interactive GDSS support (4 networked personal computers per group). Measures were taken on decision outcomes (quality, time and satisfaction with the outcomes) and decision process variables (quantity of unique alternatives, distribution of individual participation, and satisfaction with the process). We found that the interactive GDSS groups generated a higher number of unique ideas and had more even participation rates. However they were less satisfied with both the process and the outcomes. We also found no significant difference between the groups in terms of decision quality and decision time.

AB - As we begin to see evidence that Group Decision Support Systems can be beneficial, it becomes increasingly important to investigate the effect of different GDSS designs on decision making processes. This study investigated the effect of a GDSS based on the Strategic Assumption Surfacing and Testing model for strategic planning impact analysis. A controlled laboratory experiment compared the results of 4-person groups that had either Stand-Alone GDSS support (one personal computer per group) or Interactive GDSS support (4 networked personal computers per group). Measures were taken on decision outcomes (quality, time and satisfaction with the outcomes) and decision process variables (quantity of unique alternatives, distribution of individual participation, and satisfaction with the process). We found that the interactive GDSS groups generated a higher number of unique ideas and had more even participation rates. However they were less satisfied with both the process and the outcomes. We also found no significant difference between the groups in terms of decision quality and decision time.

KW - Computer supported collaborative work

KW - Computer supported groups

KW - Computer supported work

KW - Group decision support systems

KW - Group process and outcomes

KW - stakeholder analysis. Computer supported meetings

KW - Strategic planning.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026854338&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026854338&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0167-9236(92)90006-B

DO - 10.1016/0167-9236(92)90006-B

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0026854338

VL - 8

SP - 159

EP - 168

JO - Decision Support Systems

JF - Decision Support Systems

SN - 0167-9236

IS - 2

ER -