Intergenic DNA sequences from the human X chromosome reveal high rates of global gene flow

Murray P. Cox, August E. Woerner, Jeffrey D. Wall, Michael F Hammer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Despite intensive efforts devoted to collecting human polymorphism data, little is known about the role of gene flow in the ancestry of human populations. This is partly because most analyses have applied one of two simple models of population structure, the island model or the splitting model, which make unrealistic biological assumptions. Results: Here, we analyze 98-kb of DNA sequence from 20 independently evolving intergenic regions on the X chromosome in a sample of 90 humans from six globally diverse populations. We employ an isolation-with-migration (IM) model, which assumes that populations split and subsequently exchange migrants, to independently estimate effective population sizes and migration rates. While the maximum effective size of modern humans is estimated at ∼10,000, individual populations vary substantially in size, with African populations tending to be larger (2,300-9,000) than non-African populations (300-3,300). We estimate mean rates of bidirectional gene flow at 4.8 × 10-4/ generation. Bidirectional migration rates are ∼5-fold higher among non-African populations (1.5 × 10-3) than among African populations (2.7 × 10-4). Interestingly, because effective sizes and migration rates are inversely related in African and non-African populations, population migration rates are similar within Africa and Eurasia (e.g., global mean Nm = 2.4). Conclusion: We conclude that gene flow has played an important role in structuring global human populations and that migration rates should be incorporated as critical parameters in models of human demography.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number76
JournalBMC Genetics
Volume9
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 27 2008

Fingerprint

Chromosomes, Human, X
Intergenic DNA
Gene Flow
Population
X Chromosome
Population Density
Islands

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Genetics
  • Genetics(clinical)

Cite this

Intergenic DNA sequences from the human X chromosome reveal high rates of global gene flow. / Cox, Murray P.; Woerner, August E.; Wall, Jeffrey D.; Hammer, Michael F.

In: BMC Genetics, Vol. 9, 76, 27.11.2008.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3d4e719c29474daf907a193cb3a76b4e,
title = "Intergenic DNA sequences from the human X chromosome reveal high rates of global gene flow",
abstract = "Background: Despite intensive efforts devoted to collecting human polymorphism data, little is known about the role of gene flow in the ancestry of human populations. This is partly because most analyses have applied one of two simple models of population structure, the island model or the splitting model, which make unrealistic biological assumptions. Results: Here, we analyze 98-kb of DNA sequence from 20 independently evolving intergenic regions on the X chromosome in a sample of 90 humans from six globally diverse populations. We employ an isolation-with-migration (IM) model, which assumes that populations split and subsequently exchange migrants, to independently estimate effective population sizes and migration rates. While the maximum effective size of modern humans is estimated at ∼10,000, individual populations vary substantially in size, with African populations tending to be larger (2,300-9,000) than non-African populations (300-3,300). We estimate mean rates of bidirectional gene flow at 4.8 × 10-4/ generation. Bidirectional migration rates are ∼5-fold higher among non-African populations (1.5 × 10-3) than among African populations (2.7 × 10-4). Interestingly, because effective sizes and migration rates are inversely related in African and non-African populations, population migration rates are similar within Africa and Eurasia (e.g., global mean Nm = 2.4). Conclusion: We conclude that gene flow has played an important role in structuring global human populations and that migration rates should be incorporated as critical parameters in models of human demography.",
author = "Cox, {Murray P.} and Woerner, {August E.} and Wall, {Jeffrey D.} and Hammer, {Michael F}",
year = "2008",
month = "11",
day = "27",
doi = "10.1186/1471-2156-9-76",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
journal = "BMC Genetics",
issn = "1471-2156",
publisher = "BioMed Central",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Intergenic DNA sequences from the human X chromosome reveal high rates of global gene flow

AU - Cox, Murray P.

AU - Woerner, August E.

AU - Wall, Jeffrey D.

AU - Hammer, Michael F

PY - 2008/11/27

Y1 - 2008/11/27

N2 - Background: Despite intensive efforts devoted to collecting human polymorphism data, little is known about the role of gene flow in the ancestry of human populations. This is partly because most analyses have applied one of two simple models of population structure, the island model or the splitting model, which make unrealistic biological assumptions. Results: Here, we analyze 98-kb of DNA sequence from 20 independently evolving intergenic regions on the X chromosome in a sample of 90 humans from six globally diverse populations. We employ an isolation-with-migration (IM) model, which assumes that populations split and subsequently exchange migrants, to independently estimate effective population sizes and migration rates. While the maximum effective size of modern humans is estimated at ∼10,000, individual populations vary substantially in size, with African populations tending to be larger (2,300-9,000) than non-African populations (300-3,300). We estimate mean rates of bidirectional gene flow at 4.8 × 10-4/ generation. Bidirectional migration rates are ∼5-fold higher among non-African populations (1.5 × 10-3) than among African populations (2.7 × 10-4). Interestingly, because effective sizes and migration rates are inversely related in African and non-African populations, population migration rates are similar within Africa and Eurasia (e.g., global mean Nm = 2.4). Conclusion: We conclude that gene flow has played an important role in structuring global human populations and that migration rates should be incorporated as critical parameters in models of human demography.

AB - Background: Despite intensive efforts devoted to collecting human polymorphism data, little is known about the role of gene flow in the ancestry of human populations. This is partly because most analyses have applied one of two simple models of population structure, the island model or the splitting model, which make unrealistic biological assumptions. Results: Here, we analyze 98-kb of DNA sequence from 20 independently evolving intergenic regions on the X chromosome in a sample of 90 humans from six globally diverse populations. We employ an isolation-with-migration (IM) model, which assumes that populations split and subsequently exchange migrants, to independently estimate effective population sizes and migration rates. While the maximum effective size of modern humans is estimated at ∼10,000, individual populations vary substantially in size, with African populations tending to be larger (2,300-9,000) than non-African populations (300-3,300). We estimate mean rates of bidirectional gene flow at 4.8 × 10-4/ generation. Bidirectional migration rates are ∼5-fold higher among non-African populations (1.5 × 10-3) than among African populations (2.7 × 10-4). Interestingly, because effective sizes and migration rates are inversely related in African and non-African populations, population migration rates are similar within Africa and Eurasia (e.g., global mean Nm = 2.4). Conclusion: We conclude that gene flow has played an important role in structuring global human populations and that migration rates should be incorporated as critical parameters in models of human demography.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=58149337100&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=58149337100&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/1471-2156-9-76

DO - 10.1186/1471-2156-9-76

M3 - Article

C2 - 19038041

AN - SCOPUS:58149337100

VL - 9

JO - BMC Genetics

JF - BMC Genetics

SN - 1471-2156

M1 - 76

ER -