International regime complexity and economic law enforcement

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The article makes two contributions: first, it locates the causes of the increase in parallel, overlapping, or related proceedings in the enforcement of international trade and investment agreements in two distinct but interrelated dynamics: the inseparability or 'convergence' of trade and investment and 'minilateralism' - or the expansion of regional trade agreements as an alternative to global negotiations. In contrast to some accounts, the article is not troubled by this phenomenon. Instead, it explores the intersections between international trade regulations and investment law during the process of enforcement. Specifically, it describes how the expansion of economic arrangements creates spaces to maneuver and innovate and proposes a framework of six strategies to understand the combination of different but related bodies of laws. Second, the article presents policy-makers and treaty negotiators with a palette of targeted options that can help to control these strategies. I argue that while it may be close to impossible to catalog all the consequences of converging structures, overlapping jurisdictions, and parallel lawmakers of trade and investment, states can promote coordination across tribunals and, to a limited extent, among independent but interconnected regimes by understanding the ways economic agreements interact as an international regime complex.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)491-516
Number of pages26
JournalJournal of International Economic Law
Volume17
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2014

Fingerprint

economic law
international regime
law enforcement
world trade
economic agreement
trade regulations
Law
treaty
jurisdiction
regime
cause
International regimes
Law enforcement
Economics
economics
Overlapping
Enforcement
International trade

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Law
  • Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)

Cite this

International regime complexity and economic law enforcement. / Puig, Sergio.

In: Journal of International Economic Law, Vol. 17, No. 3, 01.09.2014, p. 491-516.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{44804f08ffed434b91948f40e83ce879,
title = "International regime complexity and economic law enforcement",
abstract = "The article makes two contributions: first, it locates the causes of the increase in parallel, overlapping, or related proceedings in the enforcement of international trade and investment agreements in two distinct but interrelated dynamics: the inseparability or 'convergence' of trade and investment and 'minilateralism' - or the expansion of regional trade agreements as an alternative to global negotiations. In contrast to some accounts, the article is not troubled by this phenomenon. Instead, it explores the intersections between international trade regulations and investment law during the process of enforcement. Specifically, it describes how the expansion of economic arrangements creates spaces to maneuver and innovate and proposes a framework of six strategies to understand the combination of different but related bodies of laws. Second, the article presents policy-makers and treaty negotiators with a palette of targeted options that can help to control these strategies. I argue that while it may be close to impossible to catalog all the consequences of converging structures, overlapping jurisdictions, and parallel lawmakers of trade and investment, states can promote coordination across tribunals and, to a limited extent, among independent but interconnected regimes by understanding the ways economic agreements interact as an international regime complex.",
author = "Sergio Puig",
year = "2014",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/jiel/jgu028",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "491--516",
journal = "Journal of International Economic Law",
issn = "1369-3034",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - International regime complexity and economic law enforcement

AU - Puig, Sergio

PY - 2014/9/1

Y1 - 2014/9/1

N2 - The article makes two contributions: first, it locates the causes of the increase in parallel, overlapping, or related proceedings in the enforcement of international trade and investment agreements in two distinct but interrelated dynamics: the inseparability or 'convergence' of trade and investment and 'minilateralism' - or the expansion of regional trade agreements as an alternative to global negotiations. In contrast to some accounts, the article is not troubled by this phenomenon. Instead, it explores the intersections between international trade regulations and investment law during the process of enforcement. Specifically, it describes how the expansion of economic arrangements creates spaces to maneuver and innovate and proposes a framework of six strategies to understand the combination of different but related bodies of laws. Second, the article presents policy-makers and treaty negotiators with a palette of targeted options that can help to control these strategies. I argue that while it may be close to impossible to catalog all the consequences of converging structures, overlapping jurisdictions, and parallel lawmakers of trade and investment, states can promote coordination across tribunals and, to a limited extent, among independent but interconnected regimes by understanding the ways economic agreements interact as an international regime complex.

AB - The article makes two contributions: first, it locates the causes of the increase in parallel, overlapping, or related proceedings in the enforcement of international trade and investment agreements in two distinct but interrelated dynamics: the inseparability or 'convergence' of trade and investment and 'minilateralism' - or the expansion of regional trade agreements as an alternative to global negotiations. In contrast to some accounts, the article is not troubled by this phenomenon. Instead, it explores the intersections between international trade regulations and investment law during the process of enforcement. Specifically, it describes how the expansion of economic arrangements creates spaces to maneuver and innovate and proposes a framework of six strategies to understand the combination of different but related bodies of laws. Second, the article presents policy-makers and treaty negotiators with a palette of targeted options that can help to control these strategies. I argue that while it may be close to impossible to catalog all the consequences of converging structures, overlapping jurisdictions, and parallel lawmakers of trade and investment, states can promote coordination across tribunals and, to a limited extent, among independent but interconnected regimes by understanding the ways economic agreements interact as an international regime complex.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84908364410&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84908364410&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/jiel/jgu028

DO - 10.1093/jiel/jgu028

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 491

EP - 516

JO - Journal of International Economic Law

JF - Journal of International Economic Law

SN - 1369-3034

IS - 3

ER -