International values of corneal elevation in normal subjects by rotating Scheimpflug camera

Matthew T. Feng, Michael W Belin, Renato Ambrósio, Satinder P S Grewal, Wang Yan, Mohamed Shafik Shaheen, Charlotte A. Jordon, Charles McGhee, Naoyuki Maeda, Tobias H. Neuhann, H. Burkhard Dick, Andreas Steinmueller

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To examine whether clinically significant differences exist in corneal elevation data from a sampling of countries worldwide. Setting: International multicenter. Design: Evaluation of diagnostic test or technology. Methods: One randomly selected eye of normal adults from 8 countries spanning 6 continents was examined using the Pentacam Eye Scanner. Anterior and posterior elevations were measured at the apex and thinnest point. Differences between countries were assessed by Kruskal-Wallis. Normative thresholds were defined according to the Tukey method. Results: The study examined 1 eye of 555 patients. Median elevations were similar across countries. Upper limits of normal for collective international data were 3.5 μm, 6.0 μm, 7.5 μm, and 13.5 μm at the anterior apex, anterior thinnest point, posterior apex, and posterior thinnest point, respectively. These and country-specific thresholds were similar to normal values from previous data; however, country-specific thresholds flagged additional eyes in China, Egypt, and India. Those thresholds were 4.5 μm at the anterior thinnest point (China and Egypt), 7.4 μm at the posterior apex (India), and 11.0 μm and 12.0 μm at the posterior thinnest point (China and Egypt, respectively). Conclusions: In general, international variations were clinically insignificant; thus, current screening guidelines maintained their applicability. Notable exceptions were China, Egypt, and India, where country-specific thresholds may better reflect the test populations and minimize potential false negative results from screening. Financial Disclosure: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned. Additional disclosures are found in the footnotes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1817-1821
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery
Volume37
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2011

Fingerprint

Egypt
China
India
Disclosure
Routine Diagnostic Tests
Reference Values
Guidelines
Technology
Population

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology
  • Sensory Systems
  • Surgery

Cite this

International values of corneal elevation in normal subjects by rotating Scheimpflug camera. / Feng, Matthew T.; Belin, Michael W; Ambrósio, Renato; Grewal, Satinder P S; Yan, Wang; Shaheen, Mohamed Shafik; Jordon, Charlotte A.; McGhee, Charles; Maeda, Naoyuki; Neuhann, Tobias H.; Dick, H. Burkhard; Steinmueller, Andreas.

In: Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, Vol. 37, No. 10, 10.2011, p. 1817-1821.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Feng, MT, Belin, MW, Ambrósio, R, Grewal, SPS, Yan, W, Shaheen, MS, Jordon, CA, McGhee, C, Maeda, N, Neuhann, TH, Dick, HB & Steinmueller, A 2011, 'International values of corneal elevation in normal subjects by rotating Scheimpflug camera', Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, vol. 37, no. 10, pp. 1817-1821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.04.030
Feng, Matthew T. ; Belin, Michael W ; Ambrósio, Renato ; Grewal, Satinder P S ; Yan, Wang ; Shaheen, Mohamed Shafik ; Jordon, Charlotte A. ; McGhee, Charles ; Maeda, Naoyuki ; Neuhann, Tobias H. ; Dick, H. Burkhard ; Steinmueller, Andreas. / International values of corneal elevation in normal subjects by rotating Scheimpflug camera. In: Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery. 2011 ; Vol. 37, No. 10. pp. 1817-1821.
@article{510667144a784054a22f6e96c9589467,
title = "International values of corneal elevation in normal subjects by rotating Scheimpflug camera",
abstract = "Purpose: To examine whether clinically significant differences exist in corneal elevation data from a sampling of countries worldwide. Setting: International multicenter. Design: Evaluation of diagnostic test or technology. Methods: One randomly selected eye of normal adults from 8 countries spanning 6 continents was examined using the Pentacam Eye Scanner. Anterior and posterior elevations were measured at the apex and thinnest point. Differences between countries were assessed by Kruskal-Wallis. Normative thresholds were defined according to the Tukey method. Results: The study examined 1 eye of 555 patients. Median elevations were similar across countries. Upper limits of normal for collective international data were 3.5 μm, 6.0 μm, 7.5 μm, and 13.5 μm at the anterior apex, anterior thinnest point, posterior apex, and posterior thinnest point, respectively. These and country-specific thresholds were similar to normal values from previous data; however, country-specific thresholds flagged additional eyes in China, Egypt, and India. Those thresholds were 4.5 μm at the anterior thinnest point (China and Egypt), 7.4 μm at the posterior apex (India), and 11.0 μm and 12.0 μm at the posterior thinnest point (China and Egypt, respectively). Conclusions: In general, international variations were clinically insignificant; thus, current screening guidelines maintained their applicability. Notable exceptions were China, Egypt, and India, where country-specific thresholds may better reflect the test populations and minimize potential false negative results from screening. Financial Disclosure: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned. Additional disclosures are found in the footnotes.",
author = "Feng, {Matthew T.} and Belin, {Michael W} and Renato Ambr{\'o}sio and Grewal, {Satinder P S} and Wang Yan and Shaheen, {Mohamed Shafik} and Jordon, {Charlotte A.} and Charles McGhee and Naoyuki Maeda and Neuhann, {Tobias H.} and Dick, {H. Burkhard} and Andreas Steinmueller",
year = "2011",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.04.030",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "37",
pages = "1817--1821",
journal = "Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery",
issn = "0886-3350",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - International values of corneal elevation in normal subjects by rotating Scheimpflug camera

AU - Feng, Matthew T.

AU - Belin, Michael W

AU - Ambrósio, Renato

AU - Grewal, Satinder P S

AU - Yan, Wang

AU - Shaheen, Mohamed Shafik

AU - Jordon, Charlotte A.

AU - McGhee, Charles

AU - Maeda, Naoyuki

AU - Neuhann, Tobias H.

AU - Dick, H. Burkhard

AU - Steinmueller, Andreas

PY - 2011/10

Y1 - 2011/10

N2 - Purpose: To examine whether clinically significant differences exist in corneal elevation data from a sampling of countries worldwide. Setting: International multicenter. Design: Evaluation of diagnostic test or technology. Methods: One randomly selected eye of normal adults from 8 countries spanning 6 continents was examined using the Pentacam Eye Scanner. Anterior and posterior elevations were measured at the apex and thinnest point. Differences between countries were assessed by Kruskal-Wallis. Normative thresholds were defined according to the Tukey method. Results: The study examined 1 eye of 555 patients. Median elevations were similar across countries. Upper limits of normal for collective international data were 3.5 μm, 6.0 μm, 7.5 μm, and 13.5 μm at the anterior apex, anterior thinnest point, posterior apex, and posterior thinnest point, respectively. These and country-specific thresholds were similar to normal values from previous data; however, country-specific thresholds flagged additional eyes in China, Egypt, and India. Those thresholds were 4.5 μm at the anterior thinnest point (China and Egypt), 7.4 μm at the posterior apex (India), and 11.0 μm and 12.0 μm at the posterior thinnest point (China and Egypt, respectively). Conclusions: In general, international variations were clinically insignificant; thus, current screening guidelines maintained their applicability. Notable exceptions were China, Egypt, and India, where country-specific thresholds may better reflect the test populations and minimize potential false negative results from screening. Financial Disclosure: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned. Additional disclosures are found in the footnotes.

AB - Purpose: To examine whether clinically significant differences exist in corneal elevation data from a sampling of countries worldwide. Setting: International multicenter. Design: Evaluation of diagnostic test or technology. Methods: One randomly selected eye of normal adults from 8 countries spanning 6 continents was examined using the Pentacam Eye Scanner. Anterior and posterior elevations were measured at the apex and thinnest point. Differences between countries were assessed by Kruskal-Wallis. Normative thresholds were defined according to the Tukey method. Results: The study examined 1 eye of 555 patients. Median elevations were similar across countries. Upper limits of normal for collective international data were 3.5 μm, 6.0 μm, 7.5 μm, and 13.5 μm at the anterior apex, anterior thinnest point, posterior apex, and posterior thinnest point, respectively. These and country-specific thresholds were similar to normal values from previous data; however, country-specific thresholds flagged additional eyes in China, Egypt, and India. Those thresholds were 4.5 μm at the anterior thinnest point (China and Egypt), 7.4 μm at the posterior apex (India), and 11.0 μm and 12.0 μm at the posterior thinnest point (China and Egypt, respectively). Conclusions: In general, international variations were clinically insignificant; thus, current screening guidelines maintained their applicability. Notable exceptions were China, Egypt, and India, where country-specific thresholds may better reflect the test populations and minimize potential false negative results from screening. Financial Disclosure: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned. Additional disclosures are found in the footnotes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80052983166&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80052983166&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.04.030

DO - 10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.04.030

M3 - Article

VL - 37

SP - 1817

EP - 1821

JO - Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery

JF - Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery

SN - 0886-3350

IS - 10

ER -