Interpretations, Evaluations, and Consequences of Interpersonal Touch

Judee K Burgoon, JOSEPH B. WALTHER, E. JAMES BAESLER

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

59 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Key elements of an expectancy violations (EV) framework are forwarded as a possible organizing framework for understanding how touch functions in interpersonal communication. Central to applying an EV framework to touch is assessing the expectedness, interpretations, and evaluations of touch and its influence on such communication outcomes as evaluations of communicator attractiveness and credibility. To address these considerations, an experiment required participants to engage in dyadic problem‐solving discussions during which they were touched or not touched by high‐valence (attractive, high status, expert) or low‐valence (unattractive, low status, inexpert) confederates. Brief touches by high‐valence communicators were less expected than from low‐valence communicators but positively evaluated from both. Touch also carried many favorable relational message interpretations, and the combination of touch and high communicator valence generally produced the highest credibility and attraction ratings. Some gender effects emerged, which appeared to moderate touch effects. Results suggest that brief touches among strangers may have positive consequences, especially when initiated by high‐valence communicators, for whom they may qualify as positive violations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)237-263
Number of pages27
JournalHuman Communication Research
Volume19
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1992

Fingerprint

communicator
Touch
interpretation
Communication
evaluation
credibility
interpersonal communication
social attraction
Experiments
rating
expert
communication
experiment
gender

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Communication
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Anthropology
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

Interpretations, Evaluations, and Consequences of Interpersonal Touch. / Burgoon, Judee K; WALTHER, JOSEPH B.; BAESLER, E. JAMES.

In: Human Communication Research, Vol. 19, No. 2, 1992, p. 237-263.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Burgoon, Judee K ; WALTHER, JOSEPH B. ; BAESLER, E. JAMES. / Interpretations, Evaluations, and Consequences of Interpersonal Touch. In: Human Communication Research. 1992 ; Vol. 19, No. 2. pp. 237-263.
@article{6ab7e58ce25041fdacd23c7e524b229d,
title = "Interpretations, Evaluations, and Consequences of Interpersonal Touch",
abstract = "Key elements of an expectancy violations (EV) framework are forwarded as a possible organizing framework for understanding how touch functions in interpersonal communication. Central to applying an EV framework to touch is assessing the expectedness, interpretations, and evaluations of touch and its influence on such communication outcomes as evaluations of communicator attractiveness and credibility. To address these considerations, an experiment required participants to engage in dyadic problem‐solving discussions during which they were touched or not touched by high‐valence (attractive, high status, expert) or low‐valence (unattractive, low status, inexpert) confederates. Brief touches by high‐valence communicators were less expected than from low‐valence communicators but positively evaluated from both. Touch also carried many favorable relational message interpretations, and the combination of touch and high communicator valence generally produced the highest credibility and attraction ratings. Some gender effects emerged, which appeared to moderate touch effects. Results suggest that brief touches among strangers may have positive consequences, especially when initiated by high‐valence communicators, for whom they may qualify as positive violations.",
author = "Burgoon, {Judee K} and WALTHER, {JOSEPH B.} and BAESLER, {E. JAMES}",
year = "1992",
doi = "10.1111/j.1468-2958.1992.tb00301.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "237--263",
journal = "Human Communication Research",
issn = "0360-3989",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Interpretations, Evaluations, and Consequences of Interpersonal Touch

AU - Burgoon, Judee K

AU - WALTHER, JOSEPH B.

AU - BAESLER, E. JAMES

PY - 1992

Y1 - 1992

N2 - Key elements of an expectancy violations (EV) framework are forwarded as a possible organizing framework for understanding how touch functions in interpersonal communication. Central to applying an EV framework to touch is assessing the expectedness, interpretations, and evaluations of touch and its influence on such communication outcomes as evaluations of communicator attractiveness and credibility. To address these considerations, an experiment required participants to engage in dyadic problem‐solving discussions during which they were touched or not touched by high‐valence (attractive, high status, expert) or low‐valence (unattractive, low status, inexpert) confederates. Brief touches by high‐valence communicators were less expected than from low‐valence communicators but positively evaluated from both. Touch also carried many favorable relational message interpretations, and the combination of touch and high communicator valence generally produced the highest credibility and attraction ratings. Some gender effects emerged, which appeared to moderate touch effects. Results suggest that brief touches among strangers may have positive consequences, especially when initiated by high‐valence communicators, for whom they may qualify as positive violations.

AB - Key elements of an expectancy violations (EV) framework are forwarded as a possible organizing framework for understanding how touch functions in interpersonal communication. Central to applying an EV framework to touch is assessing the expectedness, interpretations, and evaluations of touch and its influence on such communication outcomes as evaluations of communicator attractiveness and credibility. To address these considerations, an experiment required participants to engage in dyadic problem‐solving discussions during which they were touched or not touched by high‐valence (attractive, high status, expert) or low‐valence (unattractive, low status, inexpert) confederates. Brief touches by high‐valence communicators were less expected than from low‐valence communicators but positively evaluated from both. Touch also carried many favorable relational message interpretations, and the combination of touch and high communicator valence generally produced the highest credibility and attraction ratings. Some gender effects emerged, which appeared to moderate touch effects. Results suggest that brief touches among strangers may have positive consequences, especially when initiated by high‐valence communicators, for whom they may qualify as positive violations.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84986409649&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84986409649&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1468-2958.1992.tb00301.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1468-2958.1992.tb00301.x

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 237

EP - 263

JO - Human Communication Research

JF - Human Communication Research

SN - 0360-3989

IS - 2

ER -