Interpreting suffering from illness: The role of culture and repressive suffering construal

Qian Yang, Shi Liu, Daniel L Sullivan, Shengdong Pan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Rationale: Mental and physical illnesses are among the most prominent forms of suffering. Cultural worldviews provide tools for making sense of and coping with suffering. In this research, we examine how culture influences both experts' and laypeople's interpretation of suffering from illness. Objective: We focus on one type of interpretation of suffering- repressive suffering construal-an interpretation that frames suffering both as the result of immorality on the part of the sufferer and as having the function of maintaining social order by curtailing deviance. We sought to test whether this type of suffering interpretation is more common in cultural ecologies (e.g., urban vs. rural; higher vs. lower status) traditionally associated with collectivist values. Methods: Study 1 used data from the General Social Survey to examine variation in suffering interpretation in a representative sample of the U.S. population. Study 2 examined variation in suffering interpretation with a survey completed by a subsample of Chinese health-care professionals. Results: Study 1 found that U.S. citizens living in a rural environment are more likely to interpret illnesses as being the fault of the sufferer. Study 2 found that those from a lower-SES background are more likely to interpret illnesses in a repressive fashion. In these studies, family size mediates the effect of ecological conditions on RSC. Conclusion: Our research highlights how ecological variables associated with collectivism may bias both laypeople and professionals to interpret suffering from illness in a more repressive way.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)67-74
Number of pages8
JournalSocial Science and Medicine
Volume160
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2016

Fingerprint

Psychological Stress
illness
interpretation
layperson
Ecology
Research
Delivery of Health Care
US citizen
collectivism
family size
social order
deviant behavior
worldview
Population
ecology
Construal
Illness
coping
expert
health care

Keywords

  • Culture
  • Mental illness
  • Repressive suffering construal
  • Suffering

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health(social science)
  • History and Philosophy of Science

Cite this

Interpreting suffering from illness : The role of culture and repressive suffering construal. / Yang, Qian; Liu, Shi; Sullivan, Daniel L; Pan, Shengdong.

In: Social Science and Medicine, Vol. 160, 01.07.2016, p. 67-74.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{94ffe9fbb2684402a02e4b56f75bf4eb,
title = "Interpreting suffering from illness: The role of culture and repressive suffering construal",
abstract = "Rationale: Mental and physical illnesses are among the most prominent forms of suffering. Cultural worldviews provide tools for making sense of and coping with suffering. In this research, we examine how culture influences both experts' and laypeople's interpretation of suffering from illness. Objective: We focus on one type of interpretation of suffering- repressive suffering construal-an interpretation that frames suffering both as the result of immorality on the part of the sufferer and as having the function of maintaining social order by curtailing deviance. We sought to test whether this type of suffering interpretation is more common in cultural ecologies (e.g., urban vs. rural; higher vs. lower status) traditionally associated with collectivist values. Methods: Study 1 used data from the General Social Survey to examine variation in suffering interpretation in a representative sample of the U.S. population. Study 2 examined variation in suffering interpretation with a survey completed by a subsample of Chinese health-care professionals. Results: Study 1 found that U.S. citizens living in a rural environment are more likely to interpret illnesses as being the fault of the sufferer. Study 2 found that those from a lower-SES background are more likely to interpret illnesses in a repressive fashion. In these studies, family size mediates the effect of ecological conditions on RSC. Conclusion: Our research highlights how ecological variables associated with collectivism may bias both laypeople and professionals to interpret suffering from illness in a more repressive way.",
keywords = "Culture, Mental illness, Repressive suffering construal, Suffering",
author = "Qian Yang and Shi Liu and Sullivan, {Daniel L} and Shengdong Pan",
year = "2016",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.05.022",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "160",
pages = "67--74",
journal = "Social Science and Medicine",
issn = "0277-9536",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Interpreting suffering from illness

T2 - The role of culture and repressive suffering construal

AU - Yang, Qian

AU - Liu, Shi

AU - Sullivan, Daniel L

AU - Pan, Shengdong

PY - 2016/7/1

Y1 - 2016/7/1

N2 - Rationale: Mental and physical illnesses are among the most prominent forms of suffering. Cultural worldviews provide tools for making sense of and coping with suffering. In this research, we examine how culture influences both experts' and laypeople's interpretation of suffering from illness. Objective: We focus on one type of interpretation of suffering- repressive suffering construal-an interpretation that frames suffering both as the result of immorality on the part of the sufferer and as having the function of maintaining social order by curtailing deviance. We sought to test whether this type of suffering interpretation is more common in cultural ecologies (e.g., urban vs. rural; higher vs. lower status) traditionally associated with collectivist values. Methods: Study 1 used data from the General Social Survey to examine variation in suffering interpretation in a representative sample of the U.S. population. Study 2 examined variation in suffering interpretation with a survey completed by a subsample of Chinese health-care professionals. Results: Study 1 found that U.S. citizens living in a rural environment are more likely to interpret illnesses as being the fault of the sufferer. Study 2 found that those from a lower-SES background are more likely to interpret illnesses in a repressive fashion. In these studies, family size mediates the effect of ecological conditions on RSC. Conclusion: Our research highlights how ecological variables associated with collectivism may bias both laypeople and professionals to interpret suffering from illness in a more repressive way.

AB - Rationale: Mental and physical illnesses are among the most prominent forms of suffering. Cultural worldviews provide tools for making sense of and coping with suffering. In this research, we examine how culture influences both experts' and laypeople's interpretation of suffering from illness. Objective: We focus on one type of interpretation of suffering- repressive suffering construal-an interpretation that frames suffering both as the result of immorality on the part of the sufferer and as having the function of maintaining social order by curtailing deviance. We sought to test whether this type of suffering interpretation is more common in cultural ecologies (e.g., urban vs. rural; higher vs. lower status) traditionally associated with collectivist values. Methods: Study 1 used data from the General Social Survey to examine variation in suffering interpretation in a representative sample of the U.S. population. Study 2 examined variation in suffering interpretation with a survey completed by a subsample of Chinese health-care professionals. Results: Study 1 found that U.S. citizens living in a rural environment are more likely to interpret illnesses as being the fault of the sufferer. Study 2 found that those from a lower-SES background are more likely to interpret illnesses in a repressive fashion. In these studies, family size mediates the effect of ecological conditions on RSC. Conclusion: Our research highlights how ecological variables associated with collectivism may bias both laypeople and professionals to interpret suffering from illness in a more repressive way.

KW - Culture

KW - Mental illness

KW - Repressive suffering construal

KW - Suffering

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84969150603&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84969150603&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.05.022

DO - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.05.022

M3 - Article

C2 - 27209366

AN - SCOPUS:84969150603

VL - 160

SP - 67

EP - 74

JO - Social Science and Medicine

JF - Social Science and Medicine

SN - 0277-9536

ER -