Inter–sector water trading as a climate change adaptation strategy

Bonnie G Colby, Rosalind H. Bark

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Role of inter-sectoral water trading in climate change adaptation Water trading to improve supply reliability under climate change is a promising strategy for regions with several water-using sectors, each of which has varying marginal values for water, costs associated with water shortages, and abilities to adapt to shortfalls in supplies. Trades motivated by supply reliability are likely to involve moving water out of irrigation use, simply because agriculture accounts for the vast majority of consumptive water use in arid regions worldwide. In practice, many water transfers – for example those in the 1991 Californian Drought Bank – are from low-value crops (irrigated with high-priority water allocations) which can be annually fallowed to higher value tree and vine crops (which cannot be annually fallowed) and to environmental and urban users who are willing to pay more for water to avoid the high costs associated with shortages (Howitt, 1994; CDWR, 2000). Temporary (dry year only) transfers to improve lower priority urban, environmental, and agricultural water supply reliability have key advantages over permanent water rights buy-outs (so-called ‘buy and dry’). Temporary transfers cost less than permanent acquisitions and they engender less heated opposition over potential third-party impacts. While effective in mitigating the costs of drought-induced supply variability, dry year transfers are not suitable for providing long-term supplies to sustain a growing population. Once the dry cycle has ended, dry year transfers cannot be committed for water use in normal years (as that would preclude their use as a buffer supply during droughts).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationWater Resources Planning and Management
PublisherCambridge University Press
Pages743-754
Number of pages12
ISBN (Print)9780511974304, 9780521762588
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2011

Fingerprint

water
drought
water use
cost
climate change adaptation
crop
vine
arid region
water supply
irrigation
agriculture
climate change
allocation
water cost
rights

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Earth and Planetary Sciences(all)

Cite this

Colby, B. G., & Bark, R. H. (2011). Inter–sector water trading as a climate change adaptation strategy. In Water Resources Planning and Management (pp. 743-754). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511974304.038

Inter–sector water trading as a climate change adaptation strategy. / Colby, Bonnie G; Bark, Rosalind H.

Water Resources Planning and Management. Cambridge University Press, 2011. p. 743-754.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Colby, BG & Bark, RH 2011, Inter–sector water trading as a climate change adaptation strategy. in Water Resources Planning and Management. Cambridge University Press, pp. 743-754. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511974304.038
Colby BG, Bark RH. Inter–sector water trading as a climate change adaptation strategy. In Water Resources Planning and Management. Cambridge University Press. 2011. p. 743-754 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511974304.038
Colby, Bonnie G ; Bark, Rosalind H. / Inter–sector water trading as a climate change adaptation strategy. Water Resources Planning and Management. Cambridge University Press, 2011. pp. 743-754
@inbook{d2c3e6f257a44a9b957e02ce8288a14a,
title = "Inter–sector water trading as a climate change adaptation strategy",
abstract = "Role of inter-sectoral water trading in climate change adaptation Water trading to improve supply reliability under climate change is a promising strategy for regions with several water-using sectors, each of which has varying marginal values for water, costs associated with water shortages, and abilities to adapt to shortfalls in supplies. Trades motivated by supply reliability are likely to involve moving water out of irrigation use, simply because agriculture accounts for the vast majority of consumptive water use in arid regions worldwide. In practice, many water transfers – for example those in the 1991 Californian Drought Bank – are from low-value crops (irrigated with high-priority water allocations) which can be annually fallowed to higher value tree and vine crops (which cannot be annually fallowed) and to environmental and urban users who are willing to pay more for water to avoid the high costs associated with shortages (Howitt, 1994; CDWR, 2000). Temporary (dry year only) transfers to improve lower priority urban, environmental, and agricultural water supply reliability have key advantages over permanent water rights buy-outs (so-called ‘buy and dry’). Temporary transfers cost less than permanent acquisitions and they engender less heated opposition over potential third-party impacts. While effective in mitigating the costs of drought-induced supply variability, dry year transfers are not suitable for providing long-term supplies to sustain a growing population. Once the dry cycle has ended, dry year transfers cannot be committed for water use in normal years (as that would preclude their use as a buffer supply during droughts).",
author = "Colby, {Bonnie G} and Bark, {Rosalind H.}",
year = "2011",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/CBO9780511974304.038",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780511974304",
pages = "743--754",
booktitle = "Water Resources Planning and Management",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Inter–sector water trading as a climate change adaptation strategy

AU - Colby, Bonnie G

AU - Bark, Rosalind H.

PY - 2011/1/1

Y1 - 2011/1/1

N2 - Role of inter-sectoral water trading in climate change adaptation Water trading to improve supply reliability under climate change is a promising strategy for regions with several water-using sectors, each of which has varying marginal values for water, costs associated with water shortages, and abilities to adapt to shortfalls in supplies. Trades motivated by supply reliability are likely to involve moving water out of irrigation use, simply because agriculture accounts for the vast majority of consumptive water use in arid regions worldwide. In practice, many water transfers – for example those in the 1991 Californian Drought Bank – are from low-value crops (irrigated with high-priority water allocations) which can be annually fallowed to higher value tree and vine crops (which cannot be annually fallowed) and to environmental and urban users who are willing to pay more for water to avoid the high costs associated with shortages (Howitt, 1994; CDWR, 2000). Temporary (dry year only) transfers to improve lower priority urban, environmental, and agricultural water supply reliability have key advantages over permanent water rights buy-outs (so-called ‘buy and dry’). Temporary transfers cost less than permanent acquisitions and they engender less heated opposition over potential third-party impacts. While effective in mitigating the costs of drought-induced supply variability, dry year transfers are not suitable for providing long-term supplies to sustain a growing population. Once the dry cycle has ended, dry year transfers cannot be committed for water use in normal years (as that would preclude their use as a buffer supply during droughts).

AB - Role of inter-sectoral water trading in climate change adaptation Water trading to improve supply reliability under climate change is a promising strategy for regions with several water-using sectors, each of which has varying marginal values for water, costs associated with water shortages, and abilities to adapt to shortfalls in supplies. Trades motivated by supply reliability are likely to involve moving water out of irrigation use, simply because agriculture accounts for the vast majority of consumptive water use in arid regions worldwide. In practice, many water transfers – for example those in the 1991 Californian Drought Bank – are from low-value crops (irrigated with high-priority water allocations) which can be annually fallowed to higher value tree and vine crops (which cannot be annually fallowed) and to environmental and urban users who are willing to pay more for water to avoid the high costs associated with shortages (Howitt, 1994; CDWR, 2000). Temporary (dry year only) transfers to improve lower priority urban, environmental, and agricultural water supply reliability have key advantages over permanent water rights buy-outs (so-called ‘buy and dry’). Temporary transfers cost less than permanent acquisitions and they engender less heated opposition over potential third-party impacts. While effective in mitigating the costs of drought-induced supply variability, dry year transfers are not suitable for providing long-term supplies to sustain a growing population. Once the dry cycle has ended, dry year transfers cannot be committed for water use in normal years (as that would preclude their use as a buffer supply during droughts).

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84918803739&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84918803739&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/CBO9780511974304.038

DO - 10.1017/CBO9780511974304.038

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:84918803739

SN - 9780511974304

SN - 9780521762588

SP - 743

EP - 754

BT - Water Resources Planning and Management

PB - Cambridge University Press

ER -