Intraoperative surgical decision-making: Is it art or is it science or is it both?

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

How do we surgeons make decisions under what can be inauspicious conditions is not entirely clear. One would think and hope that we have streamlined this process clearly by now since such decisions are made countless times daily across the world. Dissecting the anatomy of this process is of great importance to all surgeons and those who work with surgeons. Most importantly, however, is the question, do patients understand entirely the thought process of their surgeon and how is this incorporated into the consent for the operation. Many of us make decisions for which later we may not have solid reason why we did it. Usually, these are decisions made on the basis of “a gut feeling” or “intuition” or the “gray hair effect” among other “techniques.” The aim of this chapter is to set the stage for the entire book on this complex and very important process, which if done properly and timely may prevent, minimize, or avoid altogether serious intraoperative and postoperative complications.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationSurgical Decision Making: Beyond the Evidence Based Surgery
PublisherSpringer International Publishing
Pages3-8
Number of pages6
ISBN (Electronic)9783319298245
ISBN (Print)9783319298221
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2016

Fingerprint

Art
Decision Making
Hope
Intuition
Intraoperative Complications
Hair
Anatomy
Emotions
Surgeons

Keywords

  • Checklist
  • Intraoperative decision
  • Surgical decision
  • Surgical standards
  • Technological advances

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Latifi, R. . (2016). Intraoperative surgical decision-making: Is it art or is it science or is it both? In Surgical Decision Making: Beyond the Evidence Based Surgery (pp. 3-8). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29824-5_1

Intraoperative surgical decision-making : Is it art or is it science or is it both? / Latifi, Rifat -.

Surgical Decision Making: Beyond the Evidence Based Surgery. Springer International Publishing, 2016. p. 3-8.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Latifi, R 2016, Intraoperative surgical decision-making: Is it art or is it science or is it both? in Surgical Decision Making: Beyond the Evidence Based Surgery. Springer International Publishing, pp. 3-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29824-5_1
Latifi R. Intraoperative surgical decision-making: Is it art or is it science or is it both? In Surgical Decision Making: Beyond the Evidence Based Surgery. Springer International Publishing. 2016. p. 3-8 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29824-5_1
Latifi, Rifat -. / Intraoperative surgical decision-making : Is it art or is it science or is it both?. Surgical Decision Making: Beyond the Evidence Based Surgery. Springer International Publishing, 2016. pp. 3-8
@inbook{66fc45bf79b74d94b4c8c8da6af848d7,
title = "Intraoperative surgical decision-making: Is it art or is it science or is it both?",
abstract = "How do we surgeons make decisions under what can be inauspicious conditions is not entirely clear. One would think and hope that we have streamlined this process clearly by now since such decisions are made countless times daily across the world. Dissecting the anatomy of this process is of great importance to all surgeons and those who work with surgeons. Most importantly, however, is the question, do patients understand entirely the thought process of their surgeon and how is this incorporated into the consent for the operation. Many of us make decisions for which later we may not have solid reason why we did it. Usually, these are decisions made on the basis of “a gut feeling” or “intuition” or the “gray hair effect” among other “techniques.” The aim of this chapter is to set the stage for the entire book on this complex and very important process, which if done properly and timely may prevent, minimize, or avoid altogether serious intraoperative and postoperative complications.",
keywords = "Checklist, Intraoperative decision, Surgical decision, Surgical standards, Technological advances",
author = "Latifi, {Rifat -}",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-319-29824-5_1",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9783319298221",
pages = "3--8",
booktitle = "Surgical Decision Making: Beyond the Evidence Based Surgery",
publisher = "Springer International Publishing",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Intraoperative surgical decision-making

T2 - Is it art or is it science or is it both?

AU - Latifi, Rifat -

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - How do we surgeons make decisions under what can be inauspicious conditions is not entirely clear. One would think and hope that we have streamlined this process clearly by now since such decisions are made countless times daily across the world. Dissecting the anatomy of this process is of great importance to all surgeons and those who work with surgeons. Most importantly, however, is the question, do patients understand entirely the thought process of their surgeon and how is this incorporated into the consent for the operation. Many of us make decisions for which later we may not have solid reason why we did it. Usually, these are decisions made on the basis of “a gut feeling” or “intuition” or the “gray hair effect” among other “techniques.” The aim of this chapter is to set the stage for the entire book on this complex and very important process, which if done properly and timely may prevent, minimize, or avoid altogether serious intraoperative and postoperative complications.

AB - How do we surgeons make decisions under what can be inauspicious conditions is not entirely clear. One would think and hope that we have streamlined this process clearly by now since such decisions are made countless times daily across the world. Dissecting the anatomy of this process is of great importance to all surgeons and those who work with surgeons. Most importantly, however, is the question, do patients understand entirely the thought process of their surgeon and how is this incorporated into the consent for the operation. Many of us make decisions for which later we may not have solid reason why we did it. Usually, these are decisions made on the basis of “a gut feeling” or “intuition” or the “gray hair effect” among other “techniques.” The aim of this chapter is to set the stage for the entire book on this complex and very important process, which if done properly and timely may prevent, minimize, or avoid altogether serious intraoperative and postoperative complications.

KW - Checklist

KW - Intraoperative decision

KW - Surgical decision

KW - Surgical standards

KW - Technological advances

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84978194277&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84978194277&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-319-29824-5_1

DO - 10.1007/978-3-319-29824-5_1

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:84978194277

SN - 9783319298221

SP - 3

EP - 8

BT - Surgical Decision Making: Beyond the Evidence Based Surgery

PB - Springer International Publishing

ER -