Intraspecies variation in cotton border cell production: Rhizosphere microbiome implications

Gilberto Curlango-Rivera, David A. Huskey, Ayman M Mostafa, John O. Kessler, Zhongguo Xiong, Martha C Hawes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Premise of the study: Border cells, which separate from the root cap, can comprise >90% of carbon-based exudates released into the rhizosphere, but may not provide a general source of nutrients for soil microorganisms. Instead, this population of specialized cells appears to function in defense of the root tip by an extracellular trapping process similar to that of mammalian white blood cells. Border cell production is tightly regulated, and direct tests of their impact on crop production have been hindered by lack of intraspecies variation. Methods: Border cell number, viability, and clumping were compared among 22 cotton cultivars. Slime layer "extracellular trap" production by border cells in response to copper chloride, an elicitor of plant defenses, was compared in two cultivars with divergent border cell production. Trapping of bacteria by border cells in these lines also was measured. Key results: Emerging roots of some cultivars produced more than 20 000 border cells per root, a 100% increase over previously reported values for this species. No differences in border cell morphology, viability, or clumping were found. Copper chloride-induced extracellular trap formation by border cells from a cultivar that produced 27 921 ± 2111 cells per root was similar to that of cells from a cultivar with 10 002 ± 614 cells, but bacterial trapping was reduced. Conclusions: Intraspecific variation in border cell production provides a tool to measure their impact on plant development in the laboratory, greenhouse, and field. Further research is needed to determine the basis for this variation, and its impact on rhizosphere community structure.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1706-1712
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican Journal of Botany
Volume100
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2013

Fingerprint

Rhizosphere
Microbiota
rhizosphere
cotton
cultivar
cells
trapping
cultivars
viability
Chlorides
Copper
Cell Survival
chloride
border
microbiome
copper
chlorides
plant defense
traps
soil microorganism

Keywords

  • Extracellular trap
  • Rhizosphere
  • Root border cells
  • Root cap

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Plant Science
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Genetics

Cite this

Intraspecies variation in cotton border cell production : Rhizosphere microbiome implications. / Curlango-Rivera, Gilberto; Huskey, David A.; Mostafa, Ayman M; Kessler, John O.; Xiong, Zhongguo; Hawes, Martha C.

In: American Journal of Botany, Vol. 100, No. 9, 09.2013, p. 1706-1712.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0ce0d4dac729466d93ff7a6042bccd40,
title = "Intraspecies variation in cotton border cell production: Rhizosphere microbiome implications",
abstract = "Premise of the study: Border cells, which separate from the root cap, can comprise >90{\%} of carbon-based exudates released into the rhizosphere, but may not provide a general source of nutrients for soil microorganisms. Instead, this population of specialized cells appears to function in defense of the root tip by an extracellular trapping process similar to that of mammalian white blood cells. Border cell production is tightly regulated, and direct tests of their impact on crop production have been hindered by lack of intraspecies variation. Methods: Border cell number, viability, and clumping were compared among 22 cotton cultivars. Slime layer {"}extracellular trap{"} production by border cells in response to copper chloride, an elicitor of plant defenses, was compared in two cultivars with divergent border cell production. Trapping of bacteria by border cells in these lines also was measured. Key results: Emerging roots of some cultivars produced more than 20 000 border cells per root, a 100{\%} increase over previously reported values for this species. No differences in border cell morphology, viability, or clumping were found. Copper chloride-induced extracellular trap formation by border cells from a cultivar that produced 27 921 ± 2111 cells per root was similar to that of cells from a cultivar with 10 002 ± 614 cells, but bacterial trapping was reduced. Conclusions: Intraspecific variation in border cell production provides a tool to measure their impact on plant development in the laboratory, greenhouse, and field. Further research is needed to determine the basis for this variation, and its impact on rhizosphere community structure.",
keywords = "Extracellular trap, Rhizosphere, Root border cells, Root cap",
author = "Gilberto Curlango-Rivera and Huskey, {David A.} and Mostafa, {Ayman M} and Kessler, {John O.} and Zhongguo Xiong and Hawes, {Martha C}",
year = "2013",
month = "9",
doi = "10.3732/ajb.1200607",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "100",
pages = "1706--1712",
journal = "American Journal of Botany",
issn = "0002-9122",
publisher = "Botanical Society of America Inc.",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Intraspecies variation in cotton border cell production

T2 - Rhizosphere microbiome implications

AU - Curlango-Rivera, Gilberto

AU - Huskey, David A.

AU - Mostafa, Ayman M

AU - Kessler, John O.

AU - Xiong, Zhongguo

AU - Hawes, Martha C

PY - 2013/9

Y1 - 2013/9

N2 - Premise of the study: Border cells, which separate from the root cap, can comprise >90% of carbon-based exudates released into the rhizosphere, but may not provide a general source of nutrients for soil microorganisms. Instead, this population of specialized cells appears to function in defense of the root tip by an extracellular trapping process similar to that of mammalian white blood cells. Border cell production is tightly regulated, and direct tests of their impact on crop production have been hindered by lack of intraspecies variation. Methods: Border cell number, viability, and clumping were compared among 22 cotton cultivars. Slime layer "extracellular trap" production by border cells in response to copper chloride, an elicitor of plant defenses, was compared in two cultivars with divergent border cell production. Trapping of bacteria by border cells in these lines also was measured. Key results: Emerging roots of some cultivars produced more than 20 000 border cells per root, a 100% increase over previously reported values for this species. No differences in border cell morphology, viability, or clumping were found. Copper chloride-induced extracellular trap formation by border cells from a cultivar that produced 27 921 ± 2111 cells per root was similar to that of cells from a cultivar with 10 002 ± 614 cells, but bacterial trapping was reduced. Conclusions: Intraspecific variation in border cell production provides a tool to measure their impact on plant development in the laboratory, greenhouse, and field. Further research is needed to determine the basis for this variation, and its impact on rhizosphere community structure.

AB - Premise of the study: Border cells, which separate from the root cap, can comprise >90% of carbon-based exudates released into the rhizosphere, but may not provide a general source of nutrients for soil microorganisms. Instead, this population of specialized cells appears to function in defense of the root tip by an extracellular trapping process similar to that of mammalian white blood cells. Border cell production is tightly regulated, and direct tests of their impact on crop production have been hindered by lack of intraspecies variation. Methods: Border cell number, viability, and clumping were compared among 22 cotton cultivars. Slime layer "extracellular trap" production by border cells in response to copper chloride, an elicitor of plant defenses, was compared in two cultivars with divergent border cell production. Trapping of bacteria by border cells in these lines also was measured. Key results: Emerging roots of some cultivars produced more than 20 000 border cells per root, a 100% increase over previously reported values for this species. No differences in border cell morphology, viability, or clumping were found. Copper chloride-induced extracellular trap formation by border cells from a cultivar that produced 27 921 ± 2111 cells per root was similar to that of cells from a cultivar with 10 002 ± 614 cells, but bacterial trapping was reduced. Conclusions: Intraspecific variation in border cell production provides a tool to measure their impact on plant development in the laboratory, greenhouse, and field. Further research is needed to determine the basis for this variation, and its impact on rhizosphere community structure.

KW - Extracellular trap

KW - Rhizosphere

KW - Root border cells

KW - Root cap

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84884176697&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84884176697&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3732/ajb.1200607

DO - 10.3732/ajb.1200607

M3 - Article

C2 - 23942085

AN - SCOPUS:84884176697

VL - 100

SP - 1706

EP - 1712

JO - American Journal of Botany

JF - American Journal of Botany

SN - 0002-9122

IS - 9

ER -