Invasion vs occupation: A hierarchy-of-influences analysis of how embeds assess influences and performance in covering the Iraq War

Shahira S Fahmy, Thomas J. Johnson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study aimed to determine how well embedded reporters perceived they covered the Iraq War and whether those attitudes have changed over time. While findings suggested embeds continue to judge their overall performance as positively in 2005/6 as in 2004, respondents largely recognized problems with the embedding process. Data analysis indicated after the official declaration of victory that embedded reporters became significantly less likely to agree that embeds were qualified for their job. Professional values and norms were perceived as the top factors in reporting the war, as suggested in both surveys. Other measures at the individual level were judged as less influential. Further, while journalistic routines were the strongest predictors of embed performance, these factors did not change over time. Embedded reporters identified individual-level factors, extra-media factors and ideological factors as more influential on their reporting after President Bush declared victory in May 2003 than before that declaration.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)23-42
Number of pages20
JournalInternational Communication Gazette
Volume74
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2012

Fingerprint

reporter
invasion
Iraq
occupation
performance
data analysis
president
Values
time

Keywords

  • embed vs unilateral
  • embedded journalism
  • hierarchy-of-influences model
  • Iraq conflict
  • Iraq ground war
  • media performance
  • occupation of Iraq
  • war coverage

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Communication
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

@article{af6fffce3cea4a7b80d45fdeb4925455,
title = "Invasion vs occupation: A hierarchy-of-influences analysis of how embeds assess influences and performance in covering the Iraq War",
abstract = "This study aimed to determine how well embedded reporters perceived they covered the Iraq War and whether those attitudes have changed over time. While findings suggested embeds continue to judge their overall performance as positively in 2005/6 as in 2004, respondents largely recognized problems with the embedding process. Data analysis indicated after the official declaration of victory that embedded reporters became significantly less likely to agree that embeds were qualified for their job. Professional values and norms were perceived as the top factors in reporting the war, as suggested in both surveys. Other measures at the individual level were judged as less influential. Further, while journalistic routines were the strongest predictors of embed performance, these factors did not change over time. Embedded reporters identified individual-level factors, extra-media factors and ideological factors as more influential on their reporting after President Bush declared victory in May 2003 than before that declaration.",
keywords = "embed vs unilateral, embedded journalism, hierarchy-of-influences model, Iraq conflict, Iraq ground war, media performance, occupation of Iraq, war coverage",
author = "Fahmy, {Shahira S} and Johnson, {Thomas J.}",
year = "2012",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1177/1748048511426988",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "74",
pages = "23--42",
journal = "International Communication Gazette",
issn = "1748-0485",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Invasion vs occupation

T2 - A hierarchy-of-influences analysis of how embeds assess influences and performance in covering the Iraq War

AU - Fahmy, Shahira S

AU - Johnson, Thomas J.

PY - 2012/2

Y1 - 2012/2

N2 - This study aimed to determine how well embedded reporters perceived they covered the Iraq War and whether those attitudes have changed over time. While findings suggested embeds continue to judge their overall performance as positively in 2005/6 as in 2004, respondents largely recognized problems with the embedding process. Data analysis indicated after the official declaration of victory that embedded reporters became significantly less likely to agree that embeds were qualified for their job. Professional values and norms were perceived as the top factors in reporting the war, as suggested in both surveys. Other measures at the individual level were judged as less influential. Further, while journalistic routines were the strongest predictors of embed performance, these factors did not change over time. Embedded reporters identified individual-level factors, extra-media factors and ideological factors as more influential on their reporting after President Bush declared victory in May 2003 than before that declaration.

AB - This study aimed to determine how well embedded reporters perceived they covered the Iraq War and whether those attitudes have changed over time. While findings suggested embeds continue to judge their overall performance as positively in 2005/6 as in 2004, respondents largely recognized problems with the embedding process. Data analysis indicated after the official declaration of victory that embedded reporters became significantly less likely to agree that embeds were qualified for their job. Professional values and norms were perceived as the top factors in reporting the war, as suggested in both surveys. Other measures at the individual level were judged as less influential. Further, while journalistic routines were the strongest predictors of embed performance, these factors did not change over time. Embedded reporters identified individual-level factors, extra-media factors and ideological factors as more influential on their reporting after President Bush declared victory in May 2003 than before that declaration.

KW - embed vs unilateral

KW - embedded journalism

KW - hierarchy-of-influences model

KW - Iraq conflict

KW - Iraq ground war

KW - media performance

KW - occupation of Iraq

KW - war coverage

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84856151380&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84856151380&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1748048511426988

DO - 10.1177/1748048511426988

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84856151380

VL - 74

SP - 23

EP - 42

JO - International Communication Gazette

JF - International Communication Gazette

SN - 1748-0485

IS - 1

ER -