Inversion of root zone soil hydraulic parameters with limited calibration data

Hongya Zhang, Jiesheng Huang, Yonggen Zhang, Jingwei Wu, Marcel Schaap, Chi Xu, Wenzhi Zeng

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

It is often a challenge to simulate soil moisture dynamics accurately when limited data are available about the soil. A forward simulation based on pedotransfer function (PTF) estimates of hydraulic parameters indeed produced severely biased moisture fluxes. This study therefore evaluated a new model inversion strategy which is able to use limited data by optimizing factors that scale PTF estimates. An important feature of this strategy is that the model inversion is performed for all profiles simultaneously, thus ensuring that the hydraulic parameters among the different profiles are adjusted at the same time by changing the scale factors while also ensuring that sufficient data are available to make inversion mathematically possible. We evaluated three main inversion models of different complexity. The simplest model (GW5), in which there were five scale factors with no horizon distinction was the most parsimonious in terms of the corrected Akaike’s Information Criterion (AICc). GW10 (with two sets of five scale factors for topsoil and subsoil), and GW30 (six sets) performed less well in terms of AICc, but were able to simulate the mean observed moisture profile much better than GW5. Additional inversions demonstrated that textural variation was important to achieve the best performance, thus indicating that the PTF estimates are a necessary part of the inversion. The GW5 model parameters appeared to be insensitive to assumptions made about total root water uptake and its distribution within the profile. The inversion method is simple and can be interfaced without much difficulty with existing vadose zone models.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)734-746
Number of pages13
JournalSoil Science Society of America Journal
Volume81
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2017

Fingerprint

rhizosphere
fluid mechanics
calibration
hydraulics
pedotransfer functions
pedotransfer function
soil
vadose zone
moisture flux
subsoil
water uptake
topsoil
inversion
parameter
soil water
soil moisture
moisture
simulation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Soil Science

Cite this

Inversion of root zone soil hydraulic parameters with limited calibration data. / Zhang, Hongya; Huang, Jiesheng; Zhang, Yonggen; Wu, Jingwei; Schaap, Marcel; Xu, Chi; Zeng, Wenzhi.

In: Soil Science Society of America Journal, Vol. 81, No. 4, 01.07.2017, p. 734-746.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Zhang, Hongya ; Huang, Jiesheng ; Zhang, Yonggen ; Wu, Jingwei ; Schaap, Marcel ; Xu, Chi ; Zeng, Wenzhi. / Inversion of root zone soil hydraulic parameters with limited calibration data. In: Soil Science Society of America Journal. 2017 ; Vol. 81, No. 4. pp. 734-746.
@article{bb1c9a0e2e0b494c8d93a0a0c222e99f,
title = "Inversion of root zone soil hydraulic parameters with limited calibration data",
abstract = "It is often a challenge to simulate soil moisture dynamics accurately when limited data are available about the soil. A forward simulation based on pedotransfer function (PTF) estimates of hydraulic parameters indeed produced severely biased moisture fluxes. This study therefore evaluated a new model inversion strategy which is able to use limited data by optimizing factors that scale PTF estimates. An important feature of this strategy is that the model inversion is performed for all profiles simultaneously, thus ensuring that the hydraulic parameters among the different profiles are adjusted at the same time by changing the scale factors while also ensuring that sufficient data are available to make inversion mathematically possible. We evaluated three main inversion models of different complexity. The simplest model (GW5), in which there were five scale factors with no horizon distinction was the most parsimonious in terms of the corrected Akaike’s Information Criterion (AICc). GW10 (with two sets of five scale factors for topsoil and subsoil), and GW30 (six sets) performed less well in terms of AICc, but were able to simulate the mean observed moisture profile much better than GW5. Additional inversions demonstrated that textural variation was important to achieve the best performance, thus indicating that the PTF estimates are a necessary part of the inversion. The GW5 model parameters appeared to be insensitive to assumptions made about total root water uptake and its distribution within the profile. The inversion method is simple and can be interfaced without much difficulty with existing vadose zone models.",
author = "Hongya Zhang and Jiesheng Huang and Yonggen Zhang and Jingwei Wu and Marcel Schaap and Chi Xu and Wenzhi Zeng",
year = "2017",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2136/sssaj2016.09.0308",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "81",
pages = "734--746",
journal = "Soil Science Society of America Journal",
issn = "0361-5995",
publisher = "Soil Science Society of America",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Inversion of root zone soil hydraulic parameters with limited calibration data

AU - Zhang, Hongya

AU - Huang, Jiesheng

AU - Zhang, Yonggen

AU - Wu, Jingwei

AU - Schaap, Marcel

AU - Xu, Chi

AU - Zeng, Wenzhi

PY - 2017/7/1

Y1 - 2017/7/1

N2 - It is often a challenge to simulate soil moisture dynamics accurately when limited data are available about the soil. A forward simulation based on pedotransfer function (PTF) estimates of hydraulic parameters indeed produced severely biased moisture fluxes. This study therefore evaluated a new model inversion strategy which is able to use limited data by optimizing factors that scale PTF estimates. An important feature of this strategy is that the model inversion is performed for all profiles simultaneously, thus ensuring that the hydraulic parameters among the different profiles are adjusted at the same time by changing the scale factors while also ensuring that sufficient data are available to make inversion mathematically possible. We evaluated three main inversion models of different complexity. The simplest model (GW5), in which there were five scale factors with no horizon distinction was the most parsimonious in terms of the corrected Akaike’s Information Criterion (AICc). GW10 (with two sets of five scale factors for topsoil and subsoil), and GW30 (six sets) performed less well in terms of AICc, but were able to simulate the mean observed moisture profile much better than GW5. Additional inversions demonstrated that textural variation was important to achieve the best performance, thus indicating that the PTF estimates are a necessary part of the inversion. The GW5 model parameters appeared to be insensitive to assumptions made about total root water uptake and its distribution within the profile. The inversion method is simple and can be interfaced without much difficulty with existing vadose zone models.

AB - It is often a challenge to simulate soil moisture dynamics accurately when limited data are available about the soil. A forward simulation based on pedotransfer function (PTF) estimates of hydraulic parameters indeed produced severely biased moisture fluxes. This study therefore evaluated a new model inversion strategy which is able to use limited data by optimizing factors that scale PTF estimates. An important feature of this strategy is that the model inversion is performed for all profiles simultaneously, thus ensuring that the hydraulic parameters among the different profiles are adjusted at the same time by changing the scale factors while also ensuring that sufficient data are available to make inversion mathematically possible. We evaluated three main inversion models of different complexity. The simplest model (GW5), in which there were five scale factors with no horizon distinction was the most parsimonious in terms of the corrected Akaike’s Information Criterion (AICc). GW10 (with two sets of five scale factors for topsoil and subsoil), and GW30 (six sets) performed less well in terms of AICc, but were able to simulate the mean observed moisture profile much better than GW5. Additional inversions demonstrated that textural variation was important to achieve the best performance, thus indicating that the PTF estimates are a necessary part of the inversion. The GW5 model parameters appeared to be insensitive to assumptions made about total root water uptake and its distribution within the profile. The inversion method is simple and can be interfaced without much difficulty with existing vadose zone models.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85028698290&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85028698290&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2136/sssaj2016.09.0308

DO - 10.2136/sssaj2016.09.0308

M3 - Article

VL - 81

SP - 734

EP - 746

JO - Soil Science Society of America Journal

JF - Soil Science Society of America Journal

SN - 0361-5995

IS - 4

ER -