Investigating clandestine drug laboratories

Adverse medical effects in law enforcement personnel

Jefferey L Burgess, Scott Barnhart, Harvey Checkoway

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

36 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A retrospective cohort study was conducted among an international group of 46 law enforcement chemists and 13 Washington State clandestine drug laboratory investigation team members with more than 2,800 combined investigations. Each participant completed a questionnaire concerning previous drug laboratory investigations and adverse health effects during response activities. Methamphetamine laboratories accounted for 81-97% of all responses. Total illness incident rates varied between 0.75-3.4% of responses. Most exposures were through inhalation, and many occurred in the years prior to use of personal protective equipment. Symptoms were primarily those of headache and respiratory, mucous membrane, and skin irritation. Most illness episodes occurred during the processing phase of laboratory responses, and none occurred during the entry phase. A majority of illness episodes occurred in laboratories with leak/spills, fire/explosion, or uncontrolled reactions. Responding to an active laboratory was associated with a 7 to 15-fold risk of becoming ill as compared with setup, in-transit, or former (equipment removed) laboratory responses. No other laboratories characteristics were consistently associated with a significantly elevated relative risk of adverse health effects.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)488-494
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican Journal of Industrial Medicine
Volume30
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1996
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Law Enforcement
Pharmaceutical Preparations
Methamphetamine
Explosions
Health
Inhalation
Headache
Mucous Membrane
Cohort Studies
Retrospective Studies
Equipment and Supplies
Skin

Keywords

  • illicit drugs
  • laboratories (clandestine)
  • methamphetamine
  • police work
  • respiratory protection

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Investigating clandestine drug laboratories : Adverse medical effects in law enforcement personnel. / Burgess, Jefferey L; Barnhart, Scott; Checkoway, Harvey.

In: American Journal of Industrial Medicine, Vol. 30, No. 4, 10.1996, p. 488-494.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{567efda4ae52459983562e9f531affa2,
title = "Investigating clandestine drug laboratories: Adverse medical effects in law enforcement personnel",
abstract = "A retrospective cohort study was conducted among an international group of 46 law enforcement chemists and 13 Washington State clandestine drug laboratory investigation team members with more than 2,800 combined investigations. Each participant completed a questionnaire concerning previous drug laboratory investigations and adverse health effects during response activities. Methamphetamine laboratories accounted for 81-97{\%} of all responses. Total illness incident rates varied between 0.75-3.4{\%} of responses. Most exposures were through inhalation, and many occurred in the years prior to use of personal protective equipment. Symptoms were primarily those of headache and respiratory, mucous membrane, and skin irritation. Most illness episodes occurred during the processing phase of laboratory responses, and none occurred during the entry phase. A majority of illness episodes occurred in laboratories with leak/spills, fire/explosion, or uncontrolled reactions. Responding to an active laboratory was associated with a 7 to 15-fold risk of becoming ill as compared with setup, in-transit, or former (equipment removed) laboratory responses. No other laboratories characteristics were consistently associated with a significantly elevated relative risk of adverse health effects.",
keywords = "illicit drugs, laboratories (clandestine), methamphetamine, police work, respiratory protection",
author = "Burgess, {Jefferey L} and Scott Barnhart and Harvey Checkoway",
year = "1996",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199610)30:4<488::AID-AJIM15>3.0.CO;2-0",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "488--494",
journal = "American Journal of Industrial Medicine",
issn = "0271-3586",
publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Investigating clandestine drug laboratories

T2 - Adverse medical effects in law enforcement personnel

AU - Burgess, Jefferey L

AU - Barnhart, Scott

AU - Checkoway, Harvey

PY - 1996/10

Y1 - 1996/10

N2 - A retrospective cohort study was conducted among an international group of 46 law enforcement chemists and 13 Washington State clandestine drug laboratory investigation team members with more than 2,800 combined investigations. Each participant completed a questionnaire concerning previous drug laboratory investigations and adverse health effects during response activities. Methamphetamine laboratories accounted for 81-97% of all responses. Total illness incident rates varied between 0.75-3.4% of responses. Most exposures were through inhalation, and many occurred in the years prior to use of personal protective equipment. Symptoms were primarily those of headache and respiratory, mucous membrane, and skin irritation. Most illness episodes occurred during the processing phase of laboratory responses, and none occurred during the entry phase. A majority of illness episodes occurred in laboratories with leak/spills, fire/explosion, or uncontrolled reactions. Responding to an active laboratory was associated with a 7 to 15-fold risk of becoming ill as compared with setup, in-transit, or former (equipment removed) laboratory responses. No other laboratories characteristics were consistently associated with a significantly elevated relative risk of adverse health effects.

AB - A retrospective cohort study was conducted among an international group of 46 law enforcement chemists and 13 Washington State clandestine drug laboratory investigation team members with more than 2,800 combined investigations. Each participant completed a questionnaire concerning previous drug laboratory investigations and adverse health effects during response activities. Methamphetamine laboratories accounted for 81-97% of all responses. Total illness incident rates varied between 0.75-3.4% of responses. Most exposures were through inhalation, and many occurred in the years prior to use of personal protective equipment. Symptoms were primarily those of headache and respiratory, mucous membrane, and skin irritation. Most illness episodes occurred during the processing phase of laboratory responses, and none occurred during the entry phase. A majority of illness episodes occurred in laboratories with leak/spills, fire/explosion, or uncontrolled reactions. Responding to an active laboratory was associated with a 7 to 15-fold risk of becoming ill as compared with setup, in-transit, or former (equipment removed) laboratory responses. No other laboratories characteristics were consistently associated with a significantly elevated relative risk of adverse health effects.

KW - illicit drugs

KW - laboratories (clandestine)

KW - methamphetamine

KW - police work

KW - respiratory protection

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029834574&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029834574&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199610)30:4<488::AID-AJIM15>3.0.CO;2-0

DO - 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199610)30:4<488::AID-AJIM15>3.0.CO;2-0

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 488

EP - 494

JO - American Journal of Industrial Medicine

JF - American Journal of Industrial Medicine

SN - 0271-3586

IS - 4

ER -