Investigating the scale of prehistoric social networks using culture, language, and point types in western North America

Briggs Buchanan, Marcus J. Hamilton, James C. Hartley, Steven L Kuhn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We examine the spatial scale of prehistoric social networks represented by point types documented in western North America through comparison with ethnohistorically documented Native American interactive networks at different levels of inclusion. The ethnohistorical data come from Joseph Jorgensen’s (1980) Western Indians, which maps tribal boundaries at European contact and the associated language lineage for each tribe. We assume that frequency of interaction follows language relationships. Proximity aside, people will share ideas more often if they possess a language, or part of a language, in common. We use tribal regions and different levels of language affiliation (families, large language groupings, and phyla) that represent increasingly broad spatial scales of social interaction. We compare these measures with the areas calculated for point types in the same general region to determine which level of social interaction recorded ethnohistorically best fits with the point type data. Our analyses show that point type areas most closely resemble the spatial extents of large language groupings and language phyla. The areas of point types are greater than individual tribal regions recorded in western North America at the time of European contact and language families. Based on these results, we suggest that the conflation of point types with prehistoric cultures commonly implied in archeology is not justified. Building on the fundamental ideas of the culture historians, we suggest that point type distributions are a consequence of extensive social interaction networks where combinations of functional and neutral point traits are shared and inherited over a large area.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-9
Number of pages9
JournalArchaeological and Anthropological Sciences
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Sep 20 2017

Fingerprint

social network
language
interaction
grouping
contact
Social Networks
Language
large family
archaeology
historian
ethnic group
inclusion
Social Interaction
Grouping
European Contact
Spatial Scale

Keywords

  • Ethnohistory
  • Languages
  • Networks
  • Point types
  • Western North America

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Archaeology
  • Anthropology
  • Archaeology

Cite this

Investigating the scale of prehistoric social networks using culture, language, and point types in western North America. / Buchanan, Briggs; Hamilton, Marcus J.; Hartley, James C.; Kuhn, Steven L.

In: Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 20.09.2017, p. 1-9.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{fe270e84741e476d964df4d77761ebdc,
title = "Investigating the scale of prehistoric social networks using culture, language, and point types in western North America",
abstract = "We examine the spatial scale of prehistoric social networks represented by point types documented in western North America through comparison with ethnohistorically documented Native American interactive networks at different levels of inclusion. The ethnohistorical data come from Joseph Jorgensen’s (1980) Western Indians, which maps tribal boundaries at European contact and the associated language lineage for each tribe. We assume that frequency of interaction follows language relationships. Proximity aside, people will share ideas more often if they possess a language, or part of a language, in common. We use tribal regions and different levels of language affiliation (families, large language groupings, and phyla) that represent increasingly broad spatial scales of social interaction. We compare these measures with the areas calculated for point types in the same general region to determine which level of social interaction recorded ethnohistorically best fits with the point type data. Our analyses show that point type areas most closely resemble the spatial extents of large language groupings and language phyla. The areas of point types are greater than individual tribal regions recorded in western North America at the time of European contact and language families. Based on these results, we suggest that the conflation of point types with prehistoric cultures commonly implied in archeology is not justified. Building on the fundamental ideas of the culture historians, we suggest that point type distributions are a consequence of extensive social interaction networks where combinations of functional and neutral point traits are shared and inherited over a large area.",
keywords = "Ethnohistory, Languages, Networks, Point types, Western North America",
author = "Briggs Buchanan and Hamilton, {Marcus J.} and Hartley, {James C.} and Kuhn, {Steven L}",
year = "2017",
month = "9",
day = "20",
doi = "10.1007/s12520-017-0537-y",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--9",
journal = "Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences",
issn = "1866-9557",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Investigating the scale of prehistoric social networks using culture, language, and point types in western North America

AU - Buchanan, Briggs

AU - Hamilton, Marcus J.

AU - Hartley, James C.

AU - Kuhn, Steven L

PY - 2017/9/20

Y1 - 2017/9/20

N2 - We examine the spatial scale of prehistoric social networks represented by point types documented in western North America through comparison with ethnohistorically documented Native American interactive networks at different levels of inclusion. The ethnohistorical data come from Joseph Jorgensen’s (1980) Western Indians, which maps tribal boundaries at European contact and the associated language lineage for each tribe. We assume that frequency of interaction follows language relationships. Proximity aside, people will share ideas more often if they possess a language, or part of a language, in common. We use tribal regions and different levels of language affiliation (families, large language groupings, and phyla) that represent increasingly broad spatial scales of social interaction. We compare these measures with the areas calculated for point types in the same general region to determine which level of social interaction recorded ethnohistorically best fits with the point type data. Our analyses show that point type areas most closely resemble the spatial extents of large language groupings and language phyla. The areas of point types are greater than individual tribal regions recorded in western North America at the time of European contact and language families. Based on these results, we suggest that the conflation of point types with prehistoric cultures commonly implied in archeology is not justified. Building on the fundamental ideas of the culture historians, we suggest that point type distributions are a consequence of extensive social interaction networks where combinations of functional and neutral point traits are shared and inherited over a large area.

AB - We examine the spatial scale of prehistoric social networks represented by point types documented in western North America through comparison with ethnohistorically documented Native American interactive networks at different levels of inclusion. The ethnohistorical data come from Joseph Jorgensen’s (1980) Western Indians, which maps tribal boundaries at European contact and the associated language lineage for each tribe. We assume that frequency of interaction follows language relationships. Proximity aside, people will share ideas more often if they possess a language, or part of a language, in common. We use tribal regions and different levels of language affiliation (families, large language groupings, and phyla) that represent increasingly broad spatial scales of social interaction. We compare these measures with the areas calculated for point types in the same general region to determine which level of social interaction recorded ethnohistorically best fits with the point type data. Our analyses show that point type areas most closely resemble the spatial extents of large language groupings and language phyla. The areas of point types are greater than individual tribal regions recorded in western North America at the time of European contact and language families. Based on these results, we suggest that the conflation of point types with prehistoric cultures commonly implied in archeology is not justified. Building on the fundamental ideas of the culture historians, we suggest that point type distributions are a consequence of extensive social interaction networks where combinations of functional and neutral point traits are shared and inherited over a large area.

KW - Ethnohistory

KW - Languages

KW - Networks

KW - Point types

KW - Western North America

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85041580821&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85041580821&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s12520-017-0537-y

DO - 10.1007/s12520-017-0537-y

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85041580821

SP - 1

EP - 9

JO - Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences

JF - Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences

SN - 1866-9557

ER -