Investigation of mechanisms contributing to slow desorption of hydrophobic organic compounds from mineral solids

James Farrell, David Grassian, Martin Jones

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

53 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This research investigates the mechanisms contributing to the slow desorption of hydrophobic organic compounds from water-saturated mineral solids. The mechanisms investigated were adsorption-retarded aqueous diffusion, micropore diffusion, high-energy micropore adsorption, and micropore blockage by precipitated minerals. To reduce the potential confounding effects of adsorbent heterogeneity, a set of homogeneous silica gel and glass bead adsorbents were used in the investigation. Desorption rates for the slow-desorbing fractions of chloroform [CF), trichloroethylene (TCE), and perchloroethylene (PCE) from silica gel did not conform to the pore-diffusion model for adsorption-retarded aqueous diffusion. This indicated that diffusion through adsorbent mesopores was not responsible for slow desorption from silica gel. Micropore-diffusion modeling of TCE desorption from three silica gels and microporous glass beads indicated that pores less than 2 nm in diameter were responsible for slow desorption. Desorption rates for CF, TCE, and PCE from silica gel were also measured in methanol solutions. Under methanol extraction conditions, desorption rates for all three compounds were 1-2 orders of magnitude less than under watersaturated conditions. This indicated that high-energy adsorption was not responsible for the slow-desorbing fraction, and suggested that mineral precipitation leads to blockage of intragranular micropores. The activation energy for TCE desoration from water-saturated silica gel was measured using temperature-programmed desorption. The TCE desorption activation energy of 15 kJ/mol was close to the dissolution enthalpy for silica gel of 13 kJ/mol. This supported the hypothesis that micropore blockage by precipitated minerals may be limiting contaminant desorption rates under water-saturated conditions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1237-1243
Number of pages7
JournalEnvironmental Science and Technology
Volume33
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 15 1999

Fingerprint

Organic compounds
Minerals
Silica Gel
organic compound
Silica gel
Desorption
desorption
Trichloroethylene
gel
silica
mineral
trichloroethylene
Tetrachloroethylene
Adsorbents
Adsorption
adsorption
Chloroform
Chlorine compounds
tetrachloroethylene
chloroform

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Science(all)
  • Environmental Chemistry
  • Environmental Engineering

Cite this

Investigation of mechanisms contributing to slow desorption of hydrophobic organic compounds from mineral solids. / Farrell, James; Grassian, David; Jones, Martin.

In: Environmental Science and Technology, Vol. 33, No. 8, 15.04.1999, p. 1237-1243.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f72d5f45fdeb41c7ba587cf6f62fd583,
title = "Investigation of mechanisms contributing to slow desorption of hydrophobic organic compounds from mineral solids",
abstract = "This research investigates the mechanisms contributing to the slow desorption of hydrophobic organic compounds from water-saturated mineral solids. The mechanisms investigated were adsorption-retarded aqueous diffusion, micropore diffusion, high-energy micropore adsorption, and micropore blockage by precipitated minerals. To reduce the potential confounding effects of adsorbent heterogeneity, a set of homogeneous silica gel and glass bead adsorbents were used in the investigation. Desorption rates for the slow-desorbing fractions of chloroform [CF), trichloroethylene (TCE), and perchloroethylene (PCE) from silica gel did not conform to the pore-diffusion model for adsorption-retarded aqueous diffusion. This indicated that diffusion through adsorbent mesopores was not responsible for slow desorption from silica gel. Micropore-diffusion modeling of TCE desorption from three silica gels and microporous glass beads indicated that pores less than 2 nm in diameter were responsible for slow desorption. Desorption rates for CF, TCE, and PCE from silica gel were also measured in methanol solutions. Under methanol extraction conditions, desorption rates for all three compounds were 1-2 orders of magnitude less than under watersaturated conditions. This indicated that high-energy adsorption was not responsible for the slow-desorbing fraction, and suggested that mineral precipitation leads to blockage of intragranular micropores. The activation energy for TCE desoration from water-saturated silica gel was measured using temperature-programmed desorption. The TCE desorption activation energy of 15 kJ/mol was close to the dissolution enthalpy for silica gel of 13 kJ/mol. This supported the hypothesis that micropore blockage by precipitated minerals may be limiting contaminant desorption rates under water-saturated conditions.",
author = "James Farrell and David Grassian and Martin Jones",
year = "1999",
month = "4",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1021/es980732f",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "1237--1243",
journal = "Environmental Science & Technology",
issn = "0013-936X",
publisher = "American Chemical Society",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Investigation of mechanisms contributing to slow desorption of hydrophobic organic compounds from mineral solids

AU - Farrell, James

AU - Grassian, David

AU - Jones, Martin

PY - 1999/4/15

Y1 - 1999/4/15

N2 - This research investigates the mechanisms contributing to the slow desorption of hydrophobic organic compounds from water-saturated mineral solids. The mechanisms investigated were adsorption-retarded aqueous diffusion, micropore diffusion, high-energy micropore adsorption, and micropore blockage by precipitated minerals. To reduce the potential confounding effects of adsorbent heterogeneity, a set of homogeneous silica gel and glass bead adsorbents were used in the investigation. Desorption rates for the slow-desorbing fractions of chloroform [CF), trichloroethylene (TCE), and perchloroethylene (PCE) from silica gel did not conform to the pore-diffusion model for adsorption-retarded aqueous diffusion. This indicated that diffusion through adsorbent mesopores was not responsible for slow desorption from silica gel. Micropore-diffusion modeling of TCE desorption from three silica gels and microporous glass beads indicated that pores less than 2 nm in diameter were responsible for slow desorption. Desorption rates for CF, TCE, and PCE from silica gel were also measured in methanol solutions. Under methanol extraction conditions, desorption rates for all three compounds were 1-2 orders of magnitude less than under watersaturated conditions. This indicated that high-energy adsorption was not responsible for the slow-desorbing fraction, and suggested that mineral precipitation leads to blockage of intragranular micropores. The activation energy for TCE desoration from water-saturated silica gel was measured using temperature-programmed desorption. The TCE desorption activation energy of 15 kJ/mol was close to the dissolution enthalpy for silica gel of 13 kJ/mol. This supported the hypothesis that micropore blockage by precipitated minerals may be limiting contaminant desorption rates under water-saturated conditions.

AB - This research investigates the mechanisms contributing to the slow desorption of hydrophobic organic compounds from water-saturated mineral solids. The mechanisms investigated were adsorption-retarded aqueous diffusion, micropore diffusion, high-energy micropore adsorption, and micropore blockage by precipitated minerals. To reduce the potential confounding effects of adsorbent heterogeneity, a set of homogeneous silica gel and glass bead adsorbents were used in the investigation. Desorption rates for the slow-desorbing fractions of chloroform [CF), trichloroethylene (TCE), and perchloroethylene (PCE) from silica gel did not conform to the pore-diffusion model for adsorption-retarded aqueous diffusion. This indicated that diffusion through adsorbent mesopores was not responsible for slow desorption from silica gel. Micropore-diffusion modeling of TCE desorption from three silica gels and microporous glass beads indicated that pores less than 2 nm in diameter were responsible for slow desorption. Desorption rates for CF, TCE, and PCE from silica gel were also measured in methanol solutions. Under methanol extraction conditions, desorption rates for all three compounds were 1-2 orders of magnitude less than under watersaturated conditions. This indicated that high-energy adsorption was not responsible for the slow-desorbing fraction, and suggested that mineral precipitation leads to blockage of intragranular micropores. The activation energy for TCE desoration from water-saturated silica gel was measured using temperature-programmed desorption. The TCE desorption activation energy of 15 kJ/mol was close to the dissolution enthalpy for silica gel of 13 kJ/mol. This supported the hypothesis that micropore blockage by precipitated minerals may be limiting contaminant desorption rates under water-saturated conditions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033561073&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033561073&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1021/es980732f

DO - 10.1021/es980732f

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0033561073

VL - 33

SP - 1237

EP - 1243

JO - Environmental Science & Technology

JF - Environmental Science & Technology

SN - 0013-936X

IS - 8

ER -