Invited Commentary: Broadening the Evidence for Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health and Education in the United States

Amy T. Schalet, John S. Santelli, Stephen T Russell, Carolyn T. Halpern, Sarah A. Miller, Sarah S. Pickering, Shoshana K. Goldberg, Jennifer M. Hoenig

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

58 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Scientific research has made major contributions to adolescent health by providing insights into factors that influence it and by defining ways to improve it. However, US adolescent sexual and reproductive health policies—particularly sexuality health education policies and programs—have not benefited from the full scope of scientific understanding. From 1998 to 2009, federal funding for sexuality education focused almost exclusively on ineffective and scientifically inaccurate abstinence-only-until-marriage (AOUM) programs. Since 2010, the largest source of federal funding for sexual health education has been the “tier 1” funding of the Office of Adolescent Health’s Teen Pregnancy Prevention Initiative. To be eligible for such funds, public and private entities must choose from a list of 35 programs that have been designated as “evidence-based” interventions (EBIs), determined based on their effectiveness at preventing teen pregnancies, reducing sexually transmitted infections, or reducing rates of sexual risk behaviors (i.e., sexual activity, contraceptive use, or number of partners). Although the transition from primarily AOUM to EBI is important progress, this definition of evidence is narrow and ignores factors known to play key roles in adolescent sexual and reproductive health. Important bodies of evidence are not treated as part of the essential evidence base, including research on lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and questioning (LGBTQ) youth; gender; and economic inequalities and health. These bodies of evidence underscore the need for sexual health education to approach adolescent sexuality holistically, to be inclusive of all youth, and to address and mitigate the impact of structural inequities. We provide recommendations to improve US sexual health education and to strengthen the translation of science into programs and policy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1595-1610
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Youth and Adolescence
Volume43
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Reproductive Health
Health Education
adolescent
health promotion
health
Sexuality
evidence
education
funding
Pregnancy in Adolescence
pregnancy
Marriage
sexuality
Sexual Behavior
marriage
adolescent sexuality
Transgender Persons
risk behavior
contraceptive
Financial Management

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Education
  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Invited Commentary : Broadening the Evidence for Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health and Education in the United States. / Schalet, Amy T.; Santelli, John S.; Russell, Stephen T; Halpern, Carolyn T.; Miller, Sarah A.; Pickering, Sarah S.; Goldberg, Shoshana K.; Hoenig, Jennifer M.

In: Journal of Youth and Adolescence, Vol. 43, No. 10, 2014, p. 1595-1610.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Schalet, Amy T. ; Santelli, John S. ; Russell, Stephen T ; Halpern, Carolyn T. ; Miller, Sarah A. ; Pickering, Sarah S. ; Goldberg, Shoshana K. ; Hoenig, Jennifer M. / Invited Commentary : Broadening the Evidence for Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health and Education in the United States. In: Journal of Youth and Adolescence. 2014 ; Vol. 43, No. 10. pp. 1595-1610.
@article{521c854886b14680ba2e94ebc12b4d0b,
title = "Invited Commentary: Broadening the Evidence for Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health and Education in the United States",
abstract = "Scientific research has made major contributions to adolescent health by providing insights into factors that influence it and by defining ways to improve it. However, US adolescent sexual and reproductive health policies—particularly sexuality health education policies and programs—have not benefited from the full scope of scientific understanding. From 1998 to 2009, federal funding for sexuality education focused almost exclusively on ineffective and scientifically inaccurate abstinence-only-until-marriage (AOUM) programs. Since 2010, the largest source of federal funding for sexual health education has been the “tier 1” funding of the Office of Adolescent Health’s Teen Pregnancy Prevention Initiative. To be eligible for such funds, public and private entities must choose from a list of 35 programs that have been designated as “evidence-based” interventions (EBIs), determined based on their effectiveness at preventing teen pregnancies, reducing sexually transmitted infections, or reducing rates of sexual risk behaviors (i.e., sexual activity, contraceptive use, or number of partners). Although the transition from primarily AOUM to EBI is important progress, this definition of evidence is narrow and ignores factors known to play key roles in adolescent sexual and reproductive health. Important bodies of evidence are not treated as part of the essential evidence base, including research on lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and questioning (LGBTQ) youth; gender; and economic inequalities and health. These bodies of evidence underscore the need for sexual health education to approach adolescent sexuality holistically, to be inclusive of all youth, and to address and mitigate the impact of structural inequities. We provide recommendations to improve US sexual health education and to strengthen the translation of science into programs and policy.",
author = "Schalet, {Amy T.} and Santelli, {John S.} and Russell, {Stephen T} and Halpern, {Carolyn T.} and Miller, {Sarah A.} and Pickering, {Sarah S.} and Goldberg, {Shoshana K.} and Hoenig, {Jennifer M.}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1007/s10964-014-0178-8",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "43",
pages = "1595--1610",
journal = "Journal of Youth and Adolescence",
issn = "0047-2891",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Invited Commentary

T2 - Broadening the Evidence for Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health and Education in the United States

AU - Schalet, Amy T.

AU - Santelli, John S.

AU - Russell, Stephen T

AU - Halpern, Carolyn T.

AU - Miller, Sarah A.

AU - Pickering, Sarah S.

AU - Goldberg, Shoshana K.

AU - Hoenig, Jennifer M.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Scientific research has made major contributions to adolescent health by providing insights into factors that influence it and by defining ways to improve it. However, US adolescent sexual and reproductive health policies—particularly sexuality health education policies and programs—have not benefited from the full scope of scientific understanding. From 1998 to 2009, federal funding for sexuality education focused almost exclusively on ineffective and scientifically inaccurate abstinence-only-until-marriage (AOUM) programs. Since 2010, the largest source of federal funding for sexual health education has been the “tier 1” funding of the Office of Adolescent Health’s Teen Pregnancy Prevention Initiative. To be eligible for such funds, public and private entities must choose from a list of 35 programs that have been designated as “evidence-based” interventions (EBIs), determined based on their effectiveness at preventing teen pregnancies, reducing sexually transmitted infections, or reducing rates of sexual risk behaviors (i.e., sexual activity, contraceptive use, or number of partners). Although the transition from primarily AOUM to EBI is important progress, this definition of evidence is narrow and ignores factors known to play key roles in adolescent sexual and reproductive health. Important bodies of evidence are not treated as part of the essential evidence base, including research on lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and questioning (LGBTQ) youth; gender; and economic inequalities and health. These bodies of evidence underscore the need for sexual health education to approach adolescent sexuality holistically, to be inclusive of all youth, and to address and mitigate the impact of structural inequities. We provide recommendations to improve US sexual health education and to strengthen the translation of science into programs and policy.

AB - Scientific research has made major contributions to adolescent health by providing insights into factors that influence it and by defining ways to improve it. However, US adolescent sexual and reproductive health policies—particularly sexuality health education policies and programs—have not benefited from the full scope of scientific understanding. From 1998 to 2009, federal funding for sexuality education focused almost exclusively on ineffective and scientifically inaccurate abstinence-only-until-marriage (AOUM) programs. Since 2010, the largest source of federal funding for sexual health education has been the “tier 1” funding of the Office of Adolescent Health’s Teen Pregnancy Prevention Initiative. To be eligible for such funds, public and private entities must choose from a list of 35 programs that have been designated as “evidence-based” interventions (EBIs), determined based on their effectiveness at preventing teen pregnancies, reducing sexually transmitted infections, or reducing rates of sexual risk behaviors (i.e., sexual activity, contraceptive use, or number of partners). Although the transition from primarily AOUM to EBI is important progress, this definition of evidence is narrow and ignores factors known to play key roles in adolescent sexual and reproductive health. Important bodies of evidence are not treated as part of the essential evidence base, including research on lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and questioning (LGBTQ) youth; gender; and economic inequalities and health. These bodies of evidence underscore the need for sexual health education to approach adolescent sexuality holistically, to be inclusive of all youth, and to address and mitigate the impact of structural inequities. We provide recommendations to improve US sexual health education and to strengthen the translation of science into programs and policy.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84919925983&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84919925983&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10964-014-0178-8

DO - 10.1007/s10964-014-0178-8

M3 - Article

C2 - 25200033

AN - SCOPUS:84919925983

VL - 43

SP - 1595

EP - 1610

JO - Journal of Youth and Adolescence

JF - Journal of Youth and Adolescence

SN - 0047-2891

IS - 10

ER -