Is democratic legitimacy possible for international institutions?

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Humanity as a whole currently faces a number of fundamental challenges that can only be dealt with on a global scale. Global warming and other environmental problems, severe poverty and the need for a fair system of international trade all call for international solutions that are achieved by means of collective decisions. But these solutions will require sacrifices on the part of all persons and there is likely to be a great deal of disagreement about the optimal solution and the fairest distribution of the burdens imposed by any solution. We need to have means for making collective decisions that all persons and the states of which they are members have good reason to regard as binding upon them. An institution has legitimacy when it has a right to rule over a certain set of issues. The moral function of the legitimacy of decision-making processes is to confer morally binding force on the decisions of the institution within a moral community even for those who disagree with them and who must sacrifice. This morally binding force is achieved for a decision-making institution when its directives create content-independent and very weighty duties to obey the decision maker. There are three main conceptions of the grounds of legitimacy in modern political thought. One says that the legitimacy of an authoritative decision process depends on the quality of the outcomes of the decision process. A second sees the legitimacy of an authoritative process as based on the consent of the members. And the third sees legitimacy as grounded in liberal democratic processes of decision making. The latter two forms of legitimacy are particularly salient when there is considerable disagreement on how to assess the quality of outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationGlobal Democracy: Normative and Empirical Perspectives
PublisherCambridge University Press
Pages69-95
Number of pages27
ISBN (Print)9780511977992, 9780521197847
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2011

Fingerprint

legitimacy
collective decision
decision making
human being
world trade
decision-making process
environmental impact
decision maker
poverty
community

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

Christiano, T. D. (2011). Is democratic legitimacy possible for international institutions? In Global Democracy: Normative and Empirical Perspectives (pp. 69-95). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511977992.004

Is democratic legitimacy possible for international institutions? / Christiano, Thomas D.

Global Democracy: Normative and Empirical Perspectives. Cambridge University Press, 2011. p. 69-95.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Christiano, TD 2011, Is democratic legitimacy possible for international institutions? in Global Democracy: Normative and Empirical Perspectives. Cambridge University Press, pp. 69-95. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511977992.004
Christiano TD. Is democratic legitimacy possible for international institutions? In Global Democracy: Normative and Empirical Perspectives. Cambridge University Press. 2011. p. 69-95 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511977992.004
Christiano, Thomas D. / Is democratic legitimacy possible for international institutions?. Global Democracy: Normative and Empirical Perspectives. Cambridge University Press, 2011. pp. 69-95
@inbook{f3a97235c14c4dcc8b5a5c806ab8f6cf,
title = "Is democratic legitimacy possible for international institutions?",
abstract = "Humanity as a whole currently faces a number of fundamental challenges that can only be dealt with on a global scale. Global warming and other environmental problems, severe poverty and the need for a fair system of international trade all call for international solutions that are achieved by means of collective decisions. But these solutions will require sacrifices on the part of all persons and there is likely to be a great deal of disagreement about the optimal solution and the fairest distribution of the burdens imposed by any solution. We need to have means for making collective decisions that all persons and the states of which they are members have good reason to regard as binding upon them. An institution has legitimacy when it has a right to rule over a certain set of issues. The moral function of the legitimacy of decision-making processes is to confer morally binding force on the decisions of the institution within a moral community even for those who disagree with them and who must sacrifice. This morally binding force is achieved for a decision-making institution when its directives create content-independent and very weighty duties to obey the decision maker. There are three main conceptions of the grounds of legitimacy in modern political thought. One says that the legitimacy of an authoritative decision process depends on the quality of the outcomes of the decision process. A second sees the legitimacy of an authoritative process as based on the consent of the members. And the third sees legitimacy as grounded in liberal democratic processes of decision making. The latter two forms of legitimacy are particularly salient when there is considerable disagreement on how to assess the quality of outcomes.",
author = "Christiano, {Thomas D}",
year = "2011",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/CBO9780511977992.004",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780511977992",
pages = "69--95",
booktitle = "Global Democracy: Normative and Empirical Perspectives",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Is democratic legitimacy possible for international institutions?

AU - Christiano, Thomas D

PY - 2011/1/1

Y1 - 2011/1/1

N2 - Humanity as a whole currently faces a number of fundamental challenges that can only be dealt with on a global scale. Global warming and other environmental problems, severe poverty and the need for a fair system of international trade all call for international solutions that are achieved by means of collective decisions. But these solutions will require sacrifices on the part of all persons and there is likely to be a great deal of disagreement about the optimal solution and the fairest distribution of the burdens imposed by any solution. We need to have means for making collective decisions that all persons and the states of which they are members have good reason to regard as binding upon them. An institution has legitimacy when it has a right to rule over a certain set of issues. The moral function of the legitimacy of decision-making processes is to confer morally binding force on the decisions of the institution within a moral community even for those who disagree with them and who must sacrifice. This morally binding force is achieved for a decision-making institution when its directives create content-independent and very weighty duties to obey the decision maker. There are three main conceptions of the grounds of legitimacy in modern political thought. One says that the legitimacy of an authoritative decision process depends on the quality of the outcomes of the decision process. A second sees the legitimacy of an authoritative process as based on the consent of the members. And the third sees legitimacy as grounded in liberal democratic processes of decision making. The latter two forms of legitimacy are particularly salient when there is considerable disagreement on how to assess the quality of outcomes.

AB - Humanity as a whole currently faces a number of fundamental challenges that can only be dealt with on a global scale. Global warming and other environmental problems, severe poverty and the need for a fair system of international trade all call for international solutions that are achieved by means of collective decisions. But these solutions will require sacrifices on the part of all persons and there is likely to be a great deal of disagreement about the optimal solution and the fairest distribution of the burdens imposed by any solution. We need to have means for making collective decisions that all persons and the states of which they are members have good reason to regard as binding upon them. An institution has legitimacy when it has a right to rule over a certain set of issues. The moral function of the legitimacy of decision-making processes is to confer morally binding force on the decisions of the institution within a moral community even for those who disagree with them and who must sacrifice. This morally binding force is achieved for a decision-making institution when its directives create content-independent and very weighty duties to obey the decision maker. There are three main conceptions of the grounds of legitimacy in modern political thought. One says that the legitimacy of an authoritative decision process depends on the quality of the outcomes of the decision process. A second sees the legitimacy of an authoritative process as based on the consent of the members. And the third sees legitimacy as grounded in liberal democratic processes of decision making. The latter two forms of legitimacy are particularly salient when there is considerable disagreement on how to assess the quality of outcomes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84892806359&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84892806359&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/CBO9780511977992.004

DO - 10.1017/CBO9780511977992.004

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:84892806359

SN - 9780511977992

SN - 9780521197847

SP - 69

EP - 95

BT - Global Democracy: Normative and Empirical Perspectives

PB - Cambridge University Press

ER -