Is early chemical thromboprophylaxis in patients with solid organ injury a solid decision?

David Skarupa, Kamil Hanna, Muhammad Zeeshan, Firas Madbak, Mohammad Hamidi, Zaid Haddadin, Ashley Northcutt, Lynn Gries, Narong Kulvatunyou, Bellal Joseph

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The optimal time to initiate chemical thromboprophylaxis (CTP) in patients who have undergone nonoperative management (NOM) of blunt solid organ injuries (SOI) remains controversial. The aim of our study was to assess the impact of early initiation of CTP in patients with blunt abdominal SOIs. METHODS: We performed a 2-year (2013-2014) retrospective analysis of American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program. We included all adult trauma patients (age, ≥ 18 years) with blunt SOI who underwent NOM. Patients were stratified into three groups based on timing of CTP (early, ≤48 hours of injury; late, >48 hours of injury,; and no prophylaxis group). Our primary outcomes were rates of failure of NOM, pRBC transfusion, and mortality. Our secondary outcomes were the rate of venous thromboembolic (VTE) events (i.e., deep venous thrombosis [DVT] and/or pulmonary embolism [PE]) and length of stay. RESULTS: A total of 36,187 patients met the inclusion criteria. Mean age was 49.5 ± 19 years and 36% of patients received CTP (early, 37% (n = 4,819) versus late, 63% (n = 8,208)). After controlling for confounders, patients receiving early CTP had lower rates of DVT (p = 0.01) and PE (p = 0.01) compared with the no prophylaxis and late CTP groups. There was no difference between the three groups regarding the postprophylaxis pRBC transfusions, failure of NOM, and mortality. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that in patients undergoing NOM of blunt abdominal SOI, early initiation of CTP should be considered. It is associated with decreased rates of DVT and PE, with no significant difference in post prophylaxis pRBC transfusion, failure of nonoperative management, and mortality. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, level V.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1104-1112
Number of pages9
JournalThe journal of trauma and acute care surgery
Volume87
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2019

Fingerprint

Wounds and Injuries
Pulmonary Embolism
Venous Thrombosis
Mortality
Quality Improvement
Length of Stay
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cite this

Is early chemical thromboprophylaxis in patients with solid organ injury a solid decision? / Skarupa, David; Hanna, Kamil; Zeeshan, Muhammad; Madbak, Firas; Hamidi, Mohammad; Haddadin, Zaid; Northcutt, Ashley; Gries, Lynn; Kulvatunyou, Narong; Joseph, Bellal.

In: The journal of trauma and acute care surgery, Vol. 87, No. 5, 01.11.2019, p. 1104-1112.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Skarupa, D, Hanna, K, Zeeshan, M, Madbak, F, Hamidi, M, Haddadin, Z, Northcutt, A, Gries, L, Kulvatunyou, N & Joseph, B 2019, 'Is early chemical thromboprophylaxis in patients with solid organ injury a solid decision?', The journal of trauma and acute care surgery, vol. 87, no. 5, pp. 1104-1112. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000002438
Skarupa, David ; Hanna, Kamil ; Zeeshan, Muhammad ; Madbak, Firas ; Hamidi, Mohammad ; Haddadin, Zaid ; Northcutt, Ashley ; Gries, Lynn ; Kulvatunyou, Narong ; Joseph, Bellal. / Is early chemical thromboprophylaxis in patients with solid organ injury a solid decision?. In: The journal of trauma and acute care surgery. 2019 ; Vol. 87, No. 5. pp. 1104-1112.
@article{41faf4a566264f55a225e254cd44f15c,
title = "Is early chemical thromboprophylaxis in patients with solid organ injury a solid decision?",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: The optimal time to initiate chemical thromboprophylaxis (CTP) in patients who have undergone nonoperative management (NOM) of blunt solid organ injuries (SOI) remains controversial. The aim of our study was to assess the impact of early initiation of CTP in patients with blunt abdominal SOIs. METHODS: We performed a 2-year (2013-2014) retrospective analysis of American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program. We included all adult trauma patients (age, ≥ 18 years) with blunt SOI who underwent NOM. Patients were stratified into three groups based on timing of CTP (early, ≤48 hours of injury; late, >48 hours of injury,; and no prophylaxis group). Our primary outcomes were rates of failure of NOM, pRBC transfusion, and mortality. Our secondary outcomes were the rate of venous thromboembolic (VTE) events (i.e., deep venous thrombosis [DVT] and/or pulmonary embolism [PE]) and length of stay. RESULTS: A total of 36,187 patients met the inclusion criteria. Mean age was 49.5 ± 19 years and 36{\%} of patients received CTP (early, 37{\%} (n = 4,819) versus late, 63{\%} (n = 8,208)). After controlling for confounders, patients receiving early CTP had lower rates of DVT (p = 0.01) and PE (p = 0.01) compared with the no prophylaxis and late CTP groups. There was no difference between the three groups regarding the postprophylaxis pRBC transfusions, failure of NOM, and mortality. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that in patients undergoing NOM of blunt abdominal SOI, early initiation of CTP should be considered. It is associated with decreased rates of DVT and PE, with no significant difference in post prophylaxis pRBC transfusion, failure of nonoperative management, and mortality. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, level V.",
author = "David Skarupa and Kamil Hanna and Muhammad Zeeshan and Firas Madbak and Mohammad Hamidi and Zaid Haddadin and Ashley Northcutt and Lynn Gries and Narong Kulvatunyou and Bellal Joseph",
year = "2019",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/TA.0000000000002438",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "87",
pages = "1104--1112",
journal = "Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery",
issn = "2163-0755",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is early chemical thromboprophylaxis in patients with solid organ injury a solid decision?

AU - Skarupa, David

AU - Hanna, Kamil

AU - Zeeshan, Muhammad

AU - Madbak, Firas

AU - Hamidi, Mohammad

AU - Haddadin, Zaid

AU - Northcutt, Ashley

AU - Gries, Lynn

AU - Kulvatunyou, Narong

AU - Joseph, Bellal

PY - 2019/11/1

Y1 - 2019/11/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: The optimal time to initiate chemical thromboprophylaxis (CTP) in patients who have undergone nonoperative management (NOM) of blunt solid organ injuries (SOI) remains controversial. The aim of our study was to assess the impact of early initiation of CTP in patients with blunt abdominal SOIs. METHODS: We performed a 2-year (2013-2014) retrospective analysis of American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program. We included all adult trauma patients (age, ≥ 18 years) with blunt SOI who underwent NOM. Patients were stratified into three groups based on timing of CTP (early, ≤48 hours of injury; late, >48 hours of injury,; and no prophylaxis group). Our primary outcomes were rates of failure of NOM, pRBC transfusion, and mortality. Our secondary outcomes were the rate of venous thromboembolic (VTE) events (i.e., deep venous thrombosis [DVT] and/or pulmonary embolism [PE]) and length of stay. RESULTS: A total of 36,187 patients met the inclusion criteria. Mean age was 49.5 ± 19 years and 36% of patients received CTP (early, 37% (n = 4,819) versus late, 63% (n = 8,208)). After controlling for confounders, patients receiving early CTP had lower rates of DVT (p = 0.01) and PE (p = 0.01) compared with the no prophylaxis and late CTP groups. There was no difference between the three groups regarding the postprophylaxis pRBC transfusions, failure of NOM, and mortality. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that in patients undergoing NOM of blunt abdominal SOI, early initiation of CTP should be considered. It is associated with decreased rates of DVT and PE, with no significant difference in post prophylaxis pRBC transfusion, failure of nonoperative management, and mortality. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, level V.

AB - BACKGROUND: The optimal time to initiate chemical thromboprophylaxis (CTP) in patients who have undergone nonoperative management (NOM) of blunt solid organ injuries (SOI) remains controversial. The aim of our study was to assess the impact of early initiation of CTP in patients with blunt abdominal SOIs. METHODS: We performed a 2-year (2013-2014) retrospective analysis of American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program. We included all adult trauma patients (age, ≥ 18 years) with blunt SOI who underwent NOM. Patients were stratified into three groups based on timing of CTP (early, ≤48 hours of injury; late, >48 hours of injury,; and no prophylaxis group). Our primary outcomes were rates of failure of NOM, pRBC transfusion, and mortality. Our secondary outcomes were the rate of venous thromboembolic (VTE) events (i.e., deep venous thrombosis [DVT] and/or pulmonary embolism [PE]) and length of stay. RESULTS: A total of 36,187 patients met the inclusion criteria. Mean age was 49.5 ± 19 years and 36% of patients received CTP (early, 37% (n = 4,819) versus late, 63% (n = 8,208)). After controlling for confounders, patients receiving early CTP had lower rates of DVT (p = 0.01) and PE (p = 0.01) compared with the no prophylaxis and late CTP groups. There was no difference between the three groups regarding the postprophylaxis pRBC transfusions, failure of NOM, and mortality. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that in patients undergoing NOM of blunt abdominal SOI, early initiation of CTP should be considered. It is associated with decreased rates of DVT and PE, with no significant difference in post prophylaxis pRBC transfusion, failure of nonoperative management, and mortality. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, level V.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074184989&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85074184989&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/TA.0000000000002438

DO - 10.1097/TA.0000000000002438

M3 - Article

C2 - 31299694

AN - SCOPUS:85074184989

VL - 87

SP - 1104

EP - 1112

JO - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

JF - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

SN - 2163-0755

IS - 5

ER -