Is linguistics empirical?

Thomas G Bever, J. A. Fodor, W. Weksel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper continues the discussion (see 38:1968; 40:2837) of issues raised by Braine's theory of "contextual generalization." The arguments for analyzing the English declarative as transformationally generated are discussed at length. Broader issues about the nature of confirmation of claims made by grammars are also considered. It is argued that while the direct experimental verification of such claims is often not feasible, considerations of simplicity and generality can provide adequate grounds for their empirical confirmation or disconfirmation. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)493-500
Number of pages8
JournalPsychological Review
Volume72
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1965
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Linguistics
Grammar
Contextual
Generality
Length
Simplicity

Keywords

  • CHILDHOOD
  • CHILDHOOD/LEARNING IN, LANGUAGE, CONTEXT GENERALIZATION
  • GENERALIZATION/STIMULUS, LANGUAGE LEARNING IN CHILDREN
  • LANGUAGE, LEARNING IN CHILDREN, CONTEXTUAL GENERALIZATION

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)
  • History and Philosophy of Science

Cite this

Is linguistics empirical? / Bever, Thomas G; Fodor, J. A.; Weksel, W.

In: Psychological Review, Vol. 72, No. 6, 11.1965, p. 493-500.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bever, TG, Fodor, JA & Weksel, W 1965, 'Is linguistics empirical?', Psychological Review, vol. 72, no. 6, pp. 493-500. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0022698
Bever, Thomas G ; Fodor, J. A. ; Weksel, W. / Is linguistics empirical?. In: Psychological Review. 1965 ; Vol. 72, No. 6. pp. 493-500.
@article{867e70100833491ebf32bfad7e061f8f,
title = "Is linguistics empirical?",
abstract = "This paper continues the discussion (see 38:1968; 40:2837) of issues raised by Braine's theory of {"}contextual generalization.{"} The arguments for analyzing the English declarative as transformationally generated are discussed at length. Broader issues about the nature of confirmation of claims made by grammars are also considered. It is argued that while the direct experimental verification of such claims is often not feasible, considerations of simplicity and generality can provide adequate grounds for their empirical confirmation or disconfirmation. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).",
keywords = "CHILDHOOD, CHILDHOOD/LEARNING IN, LANGUAGE, CONTEXT GENERALIZATION, GENERALIZATION/STIMULUS, LANGUAGE LEARNING IN CHILDREN, LANGUAGE, LEARNING IN CHILDREN, CONTEXTUAL GENERALIZATION",
author = "Bever, {Thomas G} and Fodor, {J. A.} and W. Weksel",
year = "1965",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1037/h0022698",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "72",
pages = "493--500",
journal = "Psychological Review",
issn = "0033-295X",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is linguistics empirical?

AU - Bever, Thomas G

AU - Fodor, J. A.

AU - Weksel, W.

PY - 1965/11

Y1 - 1965/11

N2 - This paper continues the discussion (see 38:1968; 40:2837) of issues raised by Braine's theory of "contextual generalization." The arguments for analyzing the English declarative as transformationally generated are discussed at length. Broader issues about the nature of confirmation of claims made by grammars are also considered. It is argued that while the direct experimental verification of such claims is often not feasible, considerations of simplicity and generality can provide adequate grounds for their empirical confirmation or disconfirmation. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

AB - This paper continues the discussion (see 38:1968; 40:2837) of issues raised by Braine's theory of "contextual generalization." The arguments for analyzing the English declarative as transformationally generated are discussed at length. Broader issues about the nature of confirmation of claims made by grammars are also considered. It is argued that while the direct experimental verification of such claims is often not feasible, considerations of simplicity and generality can provide adequate grounds for their empirical confirmation or disconfirmation. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

KW - CHILDHOOD

KW - CHILDHOOD/LEARNING IN, LANGUAGE, CONTEXT GENERALIZATION

KW - GENERALIZATION/STIMULUS, LANGUAGE LEARNING IN CHILDREN

KW - LANGUAGE, LEARNING IN CHILDREN, CONTEXTUAL GENERALIZATION

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0013815867&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0013815867&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/h0022698

DO - 10.1037/h0022698

M3 - Article

VL - 72

SP - 493

EP - 500

JO - Psychological Review

JF - Psychological Review

SN - 0033-295X

IS - 6

ER -