Is noise trader risk priced?

Richard W Sias, Laura T. Starks, Seha M. Tiniç

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

30 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We examine the hypothesis that closed-end fund shareholders garner greater returns than holders of the underlying assets as compensation for bearing “noise trader risk.” We demonstrate that the returns on fund shares are more volatile and exhibit greater mean reversion than the returns on the underlying assets, consistent with the hypothesis that noise traders play a more active role in closed-end fund shares than do the underlying assets. Inconsistent with the De Long et al. (1990) noise trader model, however, we find that after accounting for fund expenses, fund shareholders do not earn returns greater than holders of the underlying assets. JEL classification: G12.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)311-329
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of Financial Research
Volume24
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2001
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Noise traders
Assets
Closed-end funds
Shareholders
Mean reversion
JEL classification
Expenses

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Accounting
  • Finance

Cite this

Is noise trader risk priced? / Sias, Richard W; Starks, Laura T.; Tiniç, Seha M.

In: Journal of Financial Research, Vol. 24, No. 3, 01.01.2001, p. 311-329.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sias, Richard W ; Starks, Laura T. ; Tiniç, Seha M. / Is noise trader risk priced?. In: Journal of Financial Research. 2001 ; Vol. 24, No. 3. pp. 311-329.
@article{900abe13f08c448face04f05c53845a3,
title = "Is noise trader risk priced?",
abstract = "We examine the hypothesis that closed-end fund shareholders garner greater returns than holders of the underlying assets as compensation for bearing “noise trader risk.” We demonstrate that the returns on fund shares are more volatile and exhibit greater mean reversion than the returns on the underlying assets, consistent with the hypothesis that noise traders play a more active role in closed-end fund shares than do the underlying assets. Inconsistent with the De Long et al. (1990) noise trader model, however, we find that after accounting for fund expenses, fund shareholders do not earn returns greater than holders of the underlying assets. JEL classification: G12.",
author = "Sias, {Richard W} and Starks, {Laura T.} and Tini{\cc}, {Seha M.}",
year = "2001",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1475-6803.2001.tb00772.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "311--329",
journal = "Journal of Financial Research",
issn = "0270-2592",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is noise trader risk priced?

AU - Sias, Richard W

AU - Starks, Laura T.

AU - Tiniç, Seha M.

PY - 2001/1/1

Y1 - 2001/1/1

N2 - We examine the hypothesis that closed-end fund shareholders garner greater returns than holders of the underlying assets as compensation for bearing “noise trader risk.” We demonstrate that the returns on fund shares are more volatile and exhibit greater mean reversion than the returns on the underlying assets, consistent with the hypothesis that noise traders play a more active role in closed-end fund shares than do the underlying assets. Inconsistent with the De Long et al. (1990) noise trader model, however, we find that after accounting for fund expenses, fund shareholders do not earn returns greater than holders of the underlying assets. JEL classification: G12.

AB - We examine the hypothesis that closed-end fund shareholders garner greater returns than holders of the underlying assets as compensation for bearing “noise trader risk.” We demonstrate that the returns on fund shares are more volatile and exhibit greater mean reversion than the returns on the underlying assets, consistent with the hypothesis that noise traders play a more active role in closed-end fund shares than do the underlying assets. Inconsistent with the De Long et al. (1990) noise trader model, however, we find that after accounting for fund expenses, fund shareholders do not earn returns greater than holders of the underlying assets. JEL classification: G12.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=27844579453&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=27844579453&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1475-6803.2001.tb00772.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1475-6803.2001.tb00772.x

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 311

EP - 329

JO - Journal of Financial Research

JF - Journal of Financial Research

SN - 0270-2592

IS - 3

ER -