Is Phonology Irrelevant? How and Why Frequency Can be Modelled in Phonology

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper takes as its starting point the observation that phonological theory seems to be largely irrelevant to the concerns of a number of related fields. It is argued here that this is because phonology has been construed as a theory of the regular, as opposed to a theory of the frequent. It is hypothesized that frequent forms are also worthy of and appropriate for grammatical description. Accordingly, the most frequent stress patterns from an online dictionary and several texts are collected and analysed. It is shown that the most frequent patterns exhibit consistent regularities and are readily treated in terms of current phonological theory. This provides an existence proof that the most frequent forms are describable in grammatical terms.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)165-175
Number of pages11
JournalLiterary and Linguistic Computing
Volume13
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1998

Fingerprint

phonology
Glossaries
regularity
dictionary
Phonology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Information Systems
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

Is Phonology Irrelevant? How and Why Frequency Can be Modelled in Phonology. / Hammond, Michael.

In: Literary and Linguistic Computing, Vol. 13, No. 4, 01.01.1998, p. 165-175.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ea25c112859c4288bae471d278baba26,
title = "Is Phonology Irrelevant? How and Why Frequency Can be Modelled in Phonology",
abstract = "This paper takes as its starting point the observation that phonological theory seems to be largely irrelevant to the concerns of a number of related fields. It is argued here that this is because phonology has been construed as a theory of the regular, as opposed to a theory of the frequent. It is hypothesized that frequent forms are also worthy of and appropriate for grammatical description. Accordingly, the most frequent stress patterns from an online dictionary and several texts are collected and analysed. It is shown that the most frequent patterns exhibit consistent regularities and are readily treated in terms of current phonological theory. This provides an existence proof that the most frequent forms are describable in grammatical terms.",
author = "Michael Hammond",
year = "1998",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/llc/13.4.165",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "165--175",
journal = "Literary and Linguistics Computing",
issn = "0268-1145",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is Phonology Irrelevant? How and Why Frequency Can be Modelled in Phonology

AU - Hammond, Michael

PY - 1998/1/1

Y1 - 1998/1/1

N2 - This paper takes as its starting point the observation that phonological theory seems to be largely irrelevant to the concerns of a number of related fields. It is argued here that this is because phonology has been construed as a theory of the regular, as opposed to a theory of the frequent. It is hypothesized that frequent forms are also worthy of and appropriate for grammatical description. Accordingly, the most frequent stress patterns from an online dictionary and several texts are collected and analysed. It is shown that the most frequent patterns exhibit consistent regularities and are readily treated in terms of current phonological theory. This provides an existence proof that the most frequent forms are describable in grammatical terms.

AB - This paper takes as its starting point the observation that phonological theory seems to be largely irrelevant to the concerns of a number of related fields. It is argued here that this is because phonology has been construed as a theory of the regular, as opposed to a theory of the frequent. It is hypothesized that frequent forms are also worthy of and appropriate for grammatical description. Accordingly, the most frequent stress patterns from an online dictionary and several texts are collected and analysed. It is shown that the most frequent patterns exhibit consistent regularities and are readily treated in terms of current phonological theory. This provides an existence proof that the most frequent forms are describable in grammatical terms.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84937187838&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84937187838&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/llc/13.4.165

DO - 10.1093/llc/13.4.165

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84937187838

VL - 13

SP - 165

EP - 175

JO - Literary and Linguistics Computing

JF - Literary and Linguistics Computing

SN - 0268-1145

IS - 4

ER -