Is the public incompetent? Compared to whom? about what?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

From Mill to, most recently, Bryan Caplan, political and economic elites have been seen as the solution to the public's ignorance and incompetence. In order to show that elites are actually more competent than the public, however, we would have to find out what type of knowledge is necessary to enact good public policy. The empirical evidence shows that economic experts have a slight advantage over the general public in knowledge of how to achieve policy goals. But, contrary to Caplan, the evidence indicates that economists don't possess significant predictive knowledge, and that general economic laws are of little help in predicting the magnitude of the effects of a specific policy in a multi-variable, complex world. When we adopt a more complex understanding of the reasons behind policy choice, and consider rules and principles in addition to goal pursuit, the slight edge of economic experts evaporates.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)291-311
Number of pages21
JournalCritical Review
Volume20
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2008

Fingerprint

expert
economic law
economic elite
political elite
economist
evidence
economics
public policy
elite
Economics
Elites
Pursuit
Ignorance
Public Policy
Empirical Evidence
General Public
Economists

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

Is the public incompetent? Compared to whom? about what? / Gaus, Gerald F.

In: Critical Review, Vol. 20, No. 3, 09.2008, p. 291-311.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0feecf0da4fd4c3f89907b82f843b394,
title = "Is the public incompetent? Compared to whom? about what?",
abstract = "From Mill to, most recently, Bryan Caplan, political and economic elites have been seen as the solution to the public's ignorance and incompetence. In order to show that elites are actually more competent than the public, however, we would have to find out what type of knowledge is necessary to enact good public policy. The empirical evidence shows that economic experts have a slight advantage over the general public in knowledge of how to achieve policy goals. But, contrary to Caplan, the evidence indicates that economists don't possess significant predictive knowledge, and that general economic laws are of little help in predicting the magnitude of the effects of a specific policy in a multi-variable, complex world. When we adopt a more complex understanding of the reasons behind policy choice, and consider rules and principles in addition to goal pursuit, the slight edge of economic experts evaporates.",
author = "Gaus, {Gerald F}",
year = "2008",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1080/08913810802503467",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "291--311",
journal = "Critical Review",
issn = "0891-3811",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is the public incompetent? Compared to whom? about what?

AU - Gaus, Gerald F

PY - 2008/9

Y1 - 2008/9

N2 - From Mill to, most recently, Bryan Caplan, political and economic elites have been seen as the solution to the public's ignorance and incompetence. In order to show that elites are actually more competent than the public, however, we would have to find out what type of knowledge is necessary to enact good public policy. The empirical evidence shows that economic experts have a slight advantage over the general public in knowledge of how to achieve policy goals. But, contrary to Caplan, the evidence indicates that economists don't possess significant predictive knowledge, and that general economic laws are of little help in predicting the magnitude of the effects of a specific policy in a multi-variable, complex world. When we adopt a more complex understanding of the reasons behind policy choice, and consider rules and principles in addition to goal pursuit, the slight edge of economic experts evaporates.

AB - From Mill to, most recently, Bryan Caplan, political and economic elites have been seen as the solution to the public's ignorance and incompetence. In order to show that elites are actually more competent than the public, however, we would have to find out what type of knowledge is necessary to enact good public policy. The empirical evidence shows that economic experts have a slight advantage over the general public in knowledge of how to achieve policy goals. But, contrary to Caplan, the evidence indicates that economists don't possess significant predictive knowledge, and that general economic laws are of little help in predicting the magnitude of the effects of a specific policy in a multi-variable, complex world. When we adopt a more complex understanding of the reasons behind policy choice, and consider rules and principles in addition to goal pursuit, the slight edge of economic experts evaporates.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=65249117472&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=65249117472&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/08913810802503467

DO - 10.1080/08913810802503467

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:65249117472

VL - 20

SP - 291

EP - 311

JO - Critical Review

JF - Critical Review

SN - 0891-3811

IS - 3

ER -