Item response biases on the logical memory delayed recognition subtest of the Wechsler Memory Scale-III

William Killgore, Lynn Dellapietra

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We hypothesized that the wording and sequential order of the WMS-III Logical Memory recognition questions may bias subjects toward correct or incorrect responses on specific items. Therefore, we classified each item according to one of three potential sources of bias (yeasaying to proper names, priming of "yes" responses by previous items with similar content, naysaying to unlikely occurrences) and administered the items to 31 subjects who were completely naïve to the story content The items predicted to have correct endorsement biases were answered correctly at greater than chance frequencies, while items predicted to be biased toward incorrect answers were missed more frequently than expected by chance. The same sources of bias were tested in an independent clinical sample of 36 neurological patients who were administered the WMS-III in the standard manner. In these patients biases appeared robust enough to be detected in the performances of clinical patients during a neuropsychological evaluation. With further research, such biases may provide avenues for detecting malingering.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)851-857
Number of pages7
JournalPsychological Reports
Volume86
Issue number3 PART 1
StatePublished - Jun 2000
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Repression (Psychology)
Wechsler Scales
Malingering
Names
Research
Recognition (Psychology)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Item response biases on the logical memory delayed recognition subtest of the Wechsler Memory Scale-III. / Killgore, William; Dellapietra, Lynn.

In: Psychological Reports, Vol. 86, No. 3 PART 1, 06.2000, p. 851-857.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5c6ce32368cd4ae2abcd296a698fa3b0,
title = "Item response biases on the logical memory delayed recognition subtest of the Wechsler Memory Scale-III",
abstract = "We hypothesized that the wording and sequential order of the WMS-III Logical Memory recognition questions may bias subjects toward correct or incorrect responses on specific items. Therefore, we classified each item according to one of three potential sources of bias (yeasaying to proper names, priming of {"}yes{"} responses by previous items with similar content, naysaying to unlikely occurrences) and administered the items to 31 subjects who were completely na{\"i}ve to the story content The items predicted to have correct endorsement biases were answered correctly at greater than chance frequencies, while items predicted to be biased toward incorrect answers were missed more frequently than expected by chance. The same sources of bias were tested in an independent clinical sample of 36 neurological patients who were administered the WMS-III in the standard manner. In these patients biases appeared robust enough to be detected in the performances of clinical patients during a neuropsychological evaluation. With further research, such biases may provide avenues for detecting malingering.",
author = "William Killgore and Lynn Dellapietra",
year = "2000",
month = "6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "86",
pages = "851--857",
journal = "Psychological Reports",
issn = "0033-2941",
publisher = "Ammons Scientific Ltd",
number = "3 PART 1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Item response biases on the logical memory delayed recognition subtest of the Wechsler Memory Scale-III

AU - Killgore, William

AU - Dellapietra, Lynn

PY - 2000/6

Y1 - 2000/6

N2 - We hypothesized that the wording and sequential order of the WMS-III Logical Memory recognition questions may bias subjects toward correct or incorrect responses on specific items. Therefore, we classified each item according to one of three potential sources of bias (yeasaying to proper names, priming of "yes" responses by previous items with similar content, naysaying to unlikely occurrences) and administered the items to 31 subjects who were completely naïve to the story content The items predicted to have correct endorsement biases were answered correctly at greater than chance frequencies, while items predicted to be biased toward incorrect answers were missed more frequently than expected by chance. The same sources of bias were tested in an independent clinical sample of 36 neurological patients who were administered the WMS-III in the standard manner. In these patients biases appeared robust enough to be detected in the performances of clinical patients during a neuropsychological evaluation. With further research, such biases may provide avenues for detecting malingering.

AB - We hypothesized that the wording and sequential order of the WMS-III Logical Memory recognition questions may bias subjects toward correct or incorrect responses on specific items. Therefore, we classified each item according to one of three potential sources of bias (yeasaying to proper names, priming of "yes" responses by previous items with similar content, naysaying to unlikely occurrences) and administered the items to 31 subjects who were completely naïve to the story content The items predicted to have correct endorsement biases were answered correctly at greater than chance frequencies, while items predicted to be biased toward incorrect answers were missed more frequently than expected by chance. The same sources of bias were tested in an independent clinical sample of 36 neurological patients who were administered the WMS-III in the standard manner. In these patients biases appeared robust enough to be detected in the performances of clinical patients during a neuropsychological evaluation. With further research, such biases may provide avenues for detecting malingering.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034203513&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034203513&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 86

SP - 851

EP - 857

JO - Psychological Reports

JF - Psychological Reports

SN - 0033-2941

IS - 3 PART 1

ER -