Judgments of Social Justice: Compromises Between Equality and Efficiency

Gregory Mitchell, Philip E. Tetlock, Barbara A. Mellers, Lisa D Ordonez

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

85 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Political economists agree that a trade-off exists between equality and efficiency. Using a hypothetical society paradigm, we manipulated the mean income (representing efficiency) and income variability (representing equality) of distributions of wealth and the correlation between wealth and effort within a society. Subjects made all pairwise comparisons of distributions within societies of differing meritocracy. A "maximin" principle best described trade-off resolution strategies when effort and outcome were weakly linked: People maximized the minimum standard of living within a society. A compromise principle best described preferences when income was tightly linked to effort: People rejected distributions in which some citizens fell below the "poverty line" but maximized efficiency above this constraint. Ideological polarization was pronounced under moderate meritocracy; here liberals could focus on the role of chance and conservatives on the role of effort and ability.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)629-639
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Personality and Social Psychology
Volume65
Issue number4
StatePublished - Oct 1993
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Social Justice
social justice
compromise
meritocracy
equality
Efficiency
income
efficiency
distribution of wealth
standard of living
polarization
economist
Aptitude
Poverty
poverty
paradigm
citizen
ability
society
Society

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Social Psychology

Cite this

Judgments of Social Justice : Compromises Between Equality and Efficiency. / Mitchell, Gregory; Tetlock, Philip E.; Mellers, Barbara A.; Ordonez, Lisa D.

In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 65, No. 4, 10.1993, p. 629-639.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mitchell, Gregory ; Tetlock, Philip E. ; Mellers, Barbara A. ; Ordonez, Lisa D. / Judgments of Social Justice : Compromises Between Equality and Efficiency. In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1993 ; Vol. 65, No. 4. pp. 629-639.
@article{87b231e27b654270abfeb23b4a472805,
title = "Judgments of Social Justice: Compromises Between Equality and Efficiency",
abstract = "Political economists agree that a trade-off exists between equality and efficiency. Using a hypothetical society paradigm, we manipulated the mean income (representing efficiency) and income variability (representing equality) of distributions of wealth and the correlation between wealth and effort within a society. Subjects made all pairwise comparisons of distributions within societies of differing meritocracy. A {"}maximin{"} principle best described trade-off resolution strategies when effort and outcome were weakly linked: People maximized the minimum standard of living within a society. A compromise principle best described preferences when income was tightly linked to effort: People rejected distributions in which some citizens fell below the {"}poverty line{"} but maximized efficiency above this constraint. Ideological polarization was pronounced under moderate meritocracy; here liberals could focus on the role of chance and conservatives on the role of effort and ability.",
author = "Gregory Mitchell and Tetlock, {Philip E.} and Mellers, {Barbara A.} and Ordonez, {Lisa D}",
year = "1993",
month = "10",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "65",
pages = "629--639",
journal = "Journal of Personality and Social Psychology",
issn = "0022-3514",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Judgments of Social Justice

T2 - Compromises Between Equality and Efficiency

AU - Mitchell, Gregory

AU - Tetlock, Philip E.

AU - Mellers, Barbara A.

AU - Ordonez, Lisa D

PY - 1993/10

Y1 - 1993/10

N2 - Political economists agree that a trade-off exists between equality and efficiency. Using a hypothetical society paradigm, we manipulated the mean income (representing efficiency) and income variability (representing equality) of distributions of wealth and the correlation between wealth and effort within a society. Subjects made all pairwise comparisons of distributions within societies of differing meritocracy. A "maximin" principle best described trade-off resolution strategies when effort and outcome were weakly linked: People maximized the minimum standard of living within a society. A compromise principle best described preferences when income was tightly linked to effort: People rejected distributions in which some citizens fell below the "poverty line" but maximized efficiency above this constraint. Ideological polarization was pronounced under moderate meritocracy; here liberals could focus on the role of chance and conservatives on the role of effort and ability.

AB - Political economists agree that a trade-off exists between equality and efficiency. Using a hypothetical society paradigm, we manipulated the mean income (representing efficiency) and income variability (representing equality) of distributions of wealth and the correlation between wealth and effort within a society. Subjects made all pairwise comparisons of distributions within societies of differing meritocracy. A "maximin" principle best described trade-off resolution strategies when effort and outcome were weakly linked: People maximized the minimum standard of living within a society. A compromise principle best described preferences when income was tightly linked to effort: People rejected distributions in which some citizens fell below the "poverty line" but maximized efficiency above this constraint. Ideological polarization was pronounced under moderate meritocracy; here liberals could focus on the role of chance and conservatives on the role of effort and ability.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=21344494493&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=21344494493&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:21344494493

VL - 65

SP - 629

EP - 639

JO - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

SN - 0022-3514

IS - 4

ER -