Karyometry of infiltrating breast lesions

Denise H Frank, John R. Davis, James Ranger-Moore, Yun Liu, Hubert G. Bartels, David S Alberts, Peter H. Bartels

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To characterize nuclei from well-differentiated, moderately differentiated and poorly differentiated lesions of invasive breast cancer by karyometry and to test the hypothesis that these diagnostic categories form homogeneous sets. STUDY DESIGN: Histopathologic sections from 6 cases of well-differentiated, 11 cases of moderately differentiated and 17 cases of poorly differentiated ductal carcinomas were digitally recorded. From each case 100 nuclei were segmented and analyzed by karyometry. A discriminant analysis was performed, and nuclear and lesion signatures were computed. The nonsupervised learning algorithm P-index was applied. A progression curve per diagnostic category based on mean nuclear abnormality and a discriminant function score was derived. RESULTS: The well-differentiated lesions formed a homogeneous set, but both the moderately and poorly differentiated lesions showed 2 significantly different sub-populations with nuclei of substantially different nuclear abnormality and progression. CONCLUSION: The visual histopathologic diagnostic assessment of these lesions was based on an evaluation of both tissue architectural criteria and nuclear criteria. Here, only the pattern of nuclear chromatin was evaluated. Cases belonging to the same diagnostic category as assessed by their differentiation may be further characterized by the extent to which the nuclei deviate from normal. There was substantial case-to-case heterogeneity in these invasive lesions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)195-201
Number of pages7
JournalAnalytical and Quantitative Cytology and Histology
Volume27
Issue number4
StatePublished - Aug 2005

Fingerprint

Karyometry
Breast
Ductal Carcinoma
Discriminant Analysis
Routine Diagnostic Tests
Chromatin
Learning
Breast Neoplasms
Population

Keywords

  • Breast cancer
  • Karyometry
  • Lesion heterogeneity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anatomy
  • Histology
  • Cell Biology

Cite this

Frank, D. H., Davis, J. R., Ranger-Moore, J., Liu, Y., Bartels, H. G., Alberts, D. S., & Bartels, P. H. (2005). Karyometry of infiltrating breast lesions. Analytical and Quantitative Cytology and Histology, 27(4), 195-201.

Karyometry of infiltrating breast lesions. / Frank, Denise H; Davis, John R.; Ranger-Moore, James; Liu, Yun; Bartels, Hubert G.; Alberts, David S; Bartels, Peter H.

In: Analytical and Quantitative Cytology and Histology, Vol. 27, No. 4, 08.2005, p. 195-201.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Frank, DH, Davis, JR, Ranger-Moore, J, Liu, Y, Bartels, HG, Alberts, DS & Bartels, PH 2005, 'Karyometry of infiltrating breast lesions', Analytical and Quantitative Cytology and Histology, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 195-201.
Frank DH, Davis JR, Ranger-Moore J, Liu Y, Bartels HG, Alberts DS et al. Karyometry of infiltrating breast lesions. Analytical and Quantitative Cytology and Histology. 2005 Aug;27(4):195-201.
Frank, Denise H ; Davis, John R. ; Ranger-Moore, James ; Liu, Yun ; Bartels, Hubert G. ; Alberts, David S ; Bartels, Peter H. / Karyometry of infiltrating breast lesions. In: Analytical and Quantitative Cytology and Histology. 2005 ; Vol. 27, No. 4. pp. 195-201.
@article{e24b2751c9bd4f17956c67420209baa4,
title = "Karyometry of infiltrating breast lesions",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: To characterize nuclei from well-differentiated, moderately differentiated and poorly differentiated lesions of invasive breast cancer by karyometry and to test the hypothesis that these diagnostic categories form homogeneous sets. STUDY DESIGN: Histopathologic sections from 6 cases of well-differentiated, 11 cases of moderately differentiated and 17 cases of poorly differentiated ductal carcinomas were digitally recorded. From each case 100 nuclei were segmented and analyzed by karyometry. A discriminant analysis was performed, and nuclear and lesion signatures were computed. The nonsupervised learning algorithm P-index was applied. A progression curve per diagnostic category based on mean nuclear abnormality and a discriminant function score was derived. RESULTS: The well-differentiated lesions formed a homogeneous set, but both the moderately and poorly differentiated lesions showed 2 significantly different sub-populations with nuclei of substantially different nuclear abnormality and progression. CONCLUSION: The visual histopathologic diagnostic assessment of these lesions was based on an evaluation of both tissue architectural criteria and nuclear criteria. Here, only the pattern of nuclear chromatin was evaluated. Cases belonging to the same diagnostic category as assessed by their differentiation may be further characterized by the extent to which the nuclei deviate from normal. There was substantial case-to-case heterogeneity in these invasive lesions.",
keywords = "Breast cancer, Karyometry, Lesion heterogeneity",
author = "Frank, {Denise H} and Davis, {John R.} and James Ranger-Moore and Yun Liu and Bartels, {Hubert G.} and Alberts, {David S} and Bartels, {Peter H.}",
year = "2005",
month = "8",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "195--201",
journal = "Analytical and Quantitative Cytopathology and Histopathology",
issn = "0301-102X",
publisher = "John Rylands University Library",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Karyometry of infiltrating breast lesions

AU - Frank, Denise H

AU - Davis, John R.

AU - Ranger-Moore, James

AU - Liu, Yun

AU - Bartels, Hubert G.

AU - Alberts, David S

AU - Bartels, Peter H.

PY - 2005/8

Y1 - 2005/8

N2 - OBJECTIVE: To characterize nuclei from well-differentiated, moderately differentiated and poorly differentiated lesions of invasive breast cancer by karyometry and to test the hypothesis that these diagnostic categories form homogeneous sets. STUDY DESIGN: Histopathologic sections from 6 cases of well-differentiated, 11 cases of moderately differentiated and 17 cases of poorly differentiated ductal carcinomas were digitally recorded. From each case 100 nuclei were segmented and analyzed by karyometry. A discriminant analysis was performed, and nuclear and lesion signatures were computed. The nonsupervised learning algorithm P-index was applied. A progression curve per diagnostic category based on mean nuclear abnormality and a discriminant function score was derived. RESULTS: The well-differentiated lesions formed a homogeneous set, but both the moderately and poorly differentiated lesions showed 2 significantly different sub-populations with nuclei of substantially different nuclear abnormality and progression. CONCLUSION: The visual histopathologic diagnostic assessment of these lesions was based on an evaluation of both tissue architectural criteria and nuclear criteria. Here, only the pattern of nuclear chromatin was evaluated. Cases belonging to the same diagnostic category as assessed by their differentiation may be further characterized by the extent to which the nuclei deviate from normal. There was substantial case-to-case heterogeneity in these invasive lesions.

AB - OBJECTIVE: To characterize nuclei from well-differentiated, moderately differentiated and poorly differentiated lesions of invasive breast cancer by karyometry and to test the hypothesis that these diagnostic categories form homogeneous sets. STUDY DESIGN: Histopathologic sections from 6 cases of well-differentiated, 11 cases of moderately differentiated and 17 cases of poorly differentiated ductal carcinomas were digitally recorded. From each case 100 nuclei were segmented and analyzed by karyometry. A discriminant analysis was performed, and nuclear and lesion signatures were computed. The nonsupervised learning algorithm P-index was applied. A progression curve per diagnostic category based on mean nuclear abnormality and a discriminant function score was derived. RESULTS: The well-differentiated lesions formed a homogeneous set, but both the moderately and poorly differentiated lesions showed 2 significantly different sub-populations with nuclei of substantially different nuclear abnormality and progression. CONCLUSION: The visual histopathologic diagnostic assessment of these lesions was based on an evaluation of both tissue architectural criteria and nuclear criteria. Here, only the pattern of nuclear chromatin was evaluated. Cases belonging to the same diagnostic category as assessed by their differentiation may be further characterized by the extent to which the nuclei deviate from normal. There was substantial case-to-case heterogeneity in these invasive lesions.

KW - Breast cancer

KW - Karyometry

KW - Lesion heterogeneity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=24144473414&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=24144473414&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 16220830

AN - SCOPUS:24144473414

VL - 27

SP - 195

EP - 201

JO - Analytical and Quantitative Cytopathology and Histopathology

JF - Analytical and Quantitative Cytopathology and Histopathology

SN - 0301-102X

IS - 4

ER -