King of the Hill: Giving backward induction its best shot

Martin Dufwenberg, Matt Van Essen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

We study a class of deceptively similar games, which however have different player sets and backward induction (BI) predictions that vary with their cardinality. The game-theoretic principles involved are compelling as predictions rely on weaker and less controversial epistemic foundations than needed to justify BI more generally. Are the BI predictions empirically relevant for this class of games? We design and report results from a relevant experiment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)125-138
Number of pages14
JournalGames and Economic Behavior
Volume112
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2018

Fingerprint

Best shot
Backward induction
Prediction
Experiment

Keywords

  • Backward induction
  • Experiment
  • Interactive epistemology
  • Player set cardinality

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Finance
  • Economics and Econometrics

Cite this

King of the Hill : Giving backward induction its best shot. / Dufwenberg, Martin; Van Essen, Matt.

In: Games and Economic Behavior, Vol. 112, 01.11.2018, p. 125-138.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7c615f9e7a2342ad8b47348c74490e79,
title = "King of the Hill: Giving backward induction its best shot",
abstract = "We study a class of deceptively similar games, which however have different player sets and backward induction (BI) predictions that vary with their cardinality. The game-theoretic principles involved are compelling as predictions rely on weaker and less controversial epistemic foundations than needed to justify BI more generally. Are the BI predictions empirically relevant for this class of games? We design and report results from a relevant experiment.",
keywords = "Backward induction, Experiment, Interactive epistemology, Player set cardinality",
author = "Martin Dufwenberg and {Van Essen}, Matt",
year = "2018",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.geb.2018.07.007",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "112",
pages = "125--138",
journal = "Games and Economic Behavior",
issn = "0899-8256",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - King of the Hill

T2 - Giving backward induction its best shot

AU - Dufwenberg, Martin

AU - Van Essen, Matt

PY - 2018/11/1

Y1 - 2018/11/1

N2 - We study a class of deceptively similar games, which however have different player sets and backward induction (BI) predictions that vary with their cardinality. The game-theoretic principles involved are compelling as predictions rely on weaker and less controversial epistemic foundations than needed to justify BI more generally. Are the BI predictions empirically relevant for this class of games? We design and report results from a relevant experiment.

AB - We study a class of deceptively similar games, which however have different player sets and backward induction (BI) predictions that vary with their cardinality. The game-theoretic principles involved are compelling as predictions rely on weaker and less controversial epistemic foundations than needed to justify BI more generally. Are the BI predictions empirically relevant for this class of games? We design and report results from a relevant experiment.

KW - Backward induction

KW - Experiment

KW - Interactive epistemology

KW - Player set cardinality

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85052854104&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85052854104&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.geb.2018.07.007

DO - 10.1016/j.geb.2018.07.007

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85052854104

VL - 112

SP - 125

EP - 138

JO - Games and Economic Behavior

JF - Games and Economic Behavior

SN - 0899-8256

ER -