Labeling of dietary supplements: Consumer awareness and industry compliance

Mary Meer, Scottie L Misner, Ralph Meer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act (DSHEA 1994) provides for the use of label statements on dietary supplements. In the "Dietary Supplement Strategy: The Ten Year Plan" (Jan. 2000) and "Better Health Information for Consumers Initiative" (Dec. 2002), the FDA placed emphasis on improving consumer labeling information and strengthening enforcement of DSHEA rules. The purpose of this research project was to (1) gain insight into consumer's awareness and understanding of nutritional claims on dietary supplements using focus groups and (2) evaluate industry's compliance with selected labeling requirements by conducting product surveillance at retail establishments. Thirty-four individuals (17 men and 17 women) participated in the focus groups. Slightly more women (88%) than men (76%) indicated that they were familiar with nutritional claims on dietary supplements. While most consumers remain skeptical about the efficacy of dietary supplements and truthfulness of corresponding labeling, it does not preclude their use. The use of a scientific ranking system, similar to what's proposed for qualified health claims, for structural/function claims would provide a standard for claim substantiation and for consumers to judge their credibility. Five hundred thirty-five supplement products, manufactured and/or distributed by 238 companies, were evaluated for their compliance to selected labeling requirements. The majority (83%) of products screened, had labeling consistent with recent regulations. Having no or incomplete disclaimer with a structural/functional claim was the most common issue, occurring in 65% of the noncompliant products. The proportion of compliant and noncompliant products was not significantly different between retail categories.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)29-44
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Nutraceuticals, Functional and Medical Foods
Volume4
Issue number3-4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2004

Fingerprint

Dietary Supplements
compliance
Compliance
dietary supplements
Industry
industry
focus groups
Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994
Focus Groups
Consumer Health Information
health information
health claims
research projects
Health Education
monitoring
Health
Research

Keywords

  • Dietary supplement labeling
  • Label compliance
  • Supplement Fact Panel

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Food Science

Cite this

Labeling of dietary supplements : Consumer awareness and industry compliance. / Meer, Mary; Misner, Scottie L; Meer, Ralph.

In: Journal of Nutraceuticals, Functional and Medical Foods, Vol. 4, No. 3-4, 2004, p. 29-44.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{45cae4e714194ceeb4bbdb264f6efe50,
title = "Labeling of dietary supplements: Consumer awareness and industry compliance",
abstract = "The Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act (DSHEA 1994) provides for the use of label statements on dietary supplements. In the {"}Dietary Supplement Strategy: The Ten Year Plan{"} (Jan. 2000) and {"}Better Health Information for Consumers Initiative{"} (Dec. 2002), the FDA placed emphasis on improving consumer labeling information and strengthening enforcement of DSHEA rules. The purpose of this research project was to (1) gain insight into consumer's awareness and understanding of nutritional claims on dietary supplements using focus groups and (2) evaluate industry's compliance with selected labeling requirements by conducting product surveillance at retail establishments. Thirty-four individuals (17 men and 17 women) participated in the focus groups. Slightly more women (88{\%}) than men (76{\%}) indicated that they were familiar with nutritional claims on dietary supplements. While most consumers remain skeptical about the efficacy of dietary supplements and truthfulness of corresponding labeling, it does not preclude their use. The use of a scientific ranking system, similar to what's proposed for qualified health claims, for structural/function claims would provide a standard for claim substantiation and for consumers to judge their credibility. Five hundred thirty-five supplement products, manufactured and/or distributed by 238 companies, were evaluated for their compliance to selected labeling requirements. The majority (83{\%}) of products screened, had labeling consistent with recent regulations. Having no or incomplete disclaimer with a structural/functional claim was the most common issue, occurring in 65{\%} of the noncompliant products. The proportion of compliant and noncompliant products was not significantly different between retail categories.",
keywords = "Dietary supplement labeling, Label compliance, Supplement Fact Panel",
author = "Mary Meer and Misner, {Scottie L} and Ralph Meer",
year = "2004",
doi = "10.1300/J133v04n03_03",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "4",
pages = "29--44",
journal = "Journal of Dietary Supplements",
issn = "1939-0211",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "3-4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Labeling of dietary supplements

T2 - Consumer awareness and industry compliance

AU - Meer, Mary

AU - Misner, Scottie L

AU - Meer, Ralph

PY - 2004

Y1 - 2004

N2 - The Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act (DSHEA 1994) provides for the use of label statements on dietary supplements. In the "Dietary Supplement Strategy: The Ten Year Plan" (Jan. 2000) and "Better Health Information for Consumers Initiative" (Dec. 2002), the FDA placed emphasis on improving consumer labeling information and strengthening enforcement of DSHEA rules. The purpose of this research project was to (1) gain insight into consumer's awareness and understanding of nutritional claims on dietary supplements using focus groups and (2) evaluate industry's compliance with selected labeling requirements by conducting product surveillance at retail establishments. Thirty-four individuals (17 men and 17 women) participated in the focus groups. Slightly more women (88%) than men (76%) indicated that they were familiar with nutritional claims on dietary supplements. While most consumers remain skeptical about the efficacy of dietary supplements and truthfulness of corresponding labeling, it does not preclude their use. The use of a scientific ranking system, similar to what's proposed for qualified health claims, for structural/function claims would provide a standard for claim substantiation and for consumers to judge their credibility. Five hundred thirty-five supplement products, manufactured and/or distributed by 238 companies, were evaluated for their compliance to selected labeling requirements. The majority (83%) of products screened, had labeling consistent with recent regulations. Having no or incomplete disclaimer with a structural/functional claim was the most common issue, occurring in 65% of the noncompliant products. The proportion of compliant and noncompliant products was not significantly different between retail categories.

AB - The Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act (DSHEA 1994) provides for the use of label statements on dietary supplements. In the "Dietary Supplement Strategy: The Ten Year Plan" (Jan. 2000) and "Better Health Information for Consumers Initiative" (Dec. 2002), the FDA placed emphasis on improving consumer labeling information and strengthening enforcement of DSHEA rules. The purpose of this research project was to (1) gain insight into consumer's awareness and understanding of nutritional claims on dietary supplements using focus groups and (2) evaluate industry's compliance with selected labeling requirements by conducting product surveillance at retail establishments. Thirty-four individuals (17 men and 17 women) participated in the focus groups. Slightly more women (88%) than men (76%) indicated that they were familiar with nutritional claims on dietary supplements. While most consumers remain skeptical about the efficacy of dietary supplements and truthfulness of corresponding labeling, it does not preclude their use. The use of a scientific ranking system, similar to what's proposed for qualified health claims, for structural/function claims would provide a standard for claim substantiation and for consumers to judge their credibility. Five hundred thirty-five supplement products, manufactured and/or distributed by 238 companies, were evaluated for their compliance to selected labeling requirements. The majority (83%) of products screened, had labeling consistent with recent regulations. Having no or incomplete disclaimer with a structural/functional claim was the most common issue, occurring in 65% of the noncompliant products. The proportion of compliant and noncompliant products was not significantly different between retail categories.

KW - Dietary supplement labeling

KW - Label compliance

KW - Supplement Fact Panel

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=14944381254&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=14944381254&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1300/J133v04n03_03

DO - 10.1300/J133v04n03_03

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:14944381254

VL - 4

SP - 29

EP - 44

JO - Journal of Dietary Supplements

JF - Journal of Dietary Supplements

SN - 1939-0211

IS - 3-4

ER -