Labor and Capital in the Twenty-First Century: Rereading Braverman Today

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

How has Harry Braverman’s book Labor and Monopoly Capital, published forty years ago, stood the test of time? In this essay I argue that it remains a vital text for understanding the capitalist labor process. But I also address three lacunae in Braverman’s book. First, it overlooked limits to deskilling, such as the challenge of standardizing services; second, Braverman refused to concede that states could provide workers with material welfare, which can protect them from the labor market; and third, Labor and Monopoly Capital’s vision of the future is unnecessarily pessimistic. Standardization and automation can degrade work, but they also generate surplus that can potentially expand human freedom. Braverman’s critical analysis of production begs an equally critical account of exchange and distribution.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)299-311
Number of pages13
JournalEmployee Responsibilities and Rights Journal
Volume26
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 15 2014

Fingerprint

twenty-first century
Personnel
labor
monopoly
deskilling
automation
labor market
welfare
Standardization
worker
Automation
Labor
Monopoly
Workers
Labour market
Surplus
Labour process
Deskilling
time

Keywords

  • Braverman
  • Globalization
  • Labor process
  • Manufacturing
  • Work

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics

Cite this

Labor and Capital in the Twenty-First Century : Rereading Braverman Today. / Sallaz, Jeffrey J.

In: Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, Vol. 26, No. 4, 15.10.2014, p. 299-311.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{af6aacbc41f845bd9288dd455d9dea0e,
title = "Labor and Capital in the Twenty-First Century: Rereading Braverman Today",
abstract = "How has Harry Braverman’s book Labor and Monopoly Capital, published forty years ago, stood the test of time? In this essay I argue that it remains a vital text for understanding the capitalist labor process. But I also address three lacunae in Braverman’s book. First, it overlooked limits to deskilling, such as the challenge of standardizing services; second, Braverman refused to concede that states could provide workers with material welfare, which can protect them from the labor market; and third, Labor and Monopoly Capital’s vision of the future is unnecessarily pessimistic. Standardization and automation can degrade work, but they also generate surplus that can potentially expand human freedom. Braverman’s critical analysis of production begs an equally critical account of exchange and distribution.",
keywords = "Braverman, Globalization, Labor process, Manufacturing, Work",
author = "Sallaz, {Jeffrey J}",
year = "2014",
month = "10",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1007/s10672-014-9251-4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "299--311",
journal = "Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal",
issn = "0892-7545",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Labor and Capital in the Twenty-First Century

T2 - Rereading Braverman Today

AU - Sallaz, Jeffrey J

PY - 2014/10/15

Y1 - 2014/10/15

N2 - How has Harry Braverman’s book Labor and Monopoly Capital, published forty years ago, stood the test of time? In this essay I argue that it remains a vital text for understanding the capitalist labor process. But I also address three lacunae in Braverman’s book. First, it overlooked limits to deskilling, such as the challenge of standardizing services; second, Braverman refused to concede that states could provide workers with material welfare, which can protect them from the labor market; and third, Labor and Monopoly Capital’s vision of the future is unnecessarily pessimistic. Standardization and automation can degrade work, but they also generate surplus that can potentially expand human freedom. Braverman’s critical analysis of production begs an equally critical account of exchange and distribution.

AB - How has Harry Braverman’s book Labor and Monopoly Capital, published forty years ago, stood the test of time? In this essay I argue that it remains a vital text for understanding the capitalist labor process. But I also address three lacunae in Braverman’s book. First, it overlooked limits to deskilling, such as the challenge of standardizing services; second, Braverman refused to concede that states could provide workers with material welfare, which can protect them from the labor market; and third, Labor and Monopoly Capital’s vision of the future is unnecessarily pessimistic. Standardization and automation can degrade work, but they also generate surplus that can potentially expand human freedom. Braverman’s critical analysis of production begs an equally critical account of exchange and distribution.

KW - Braverman

KW - Globalization

KW - Labor process

KW - Manufacturing

KW - Work

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84911965124&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84911965124&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10672-014-9251-4

DO - 10.1007/s10672-014-9251-4

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84911965124

VL - 26

SP - 299

EP - 311

JO - Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal

JF - Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal

SN - 0892-7545

IS - 4

ER -