Laboratory measurements of mineral dust scattering phase function and linear polarization

Robert A. West, Lyn R. Doose, Andrew M. Eibl, Martin G Tomasko, Michael I. Mishchenko

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

76 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

With the goal of improving our understanding of how small mineral dust particles scatter light at visible and near-infrared wavelengths, we measured the scattering phase function and linear polarization of small mineral dust particles over the scattering angle range 15°-170° at three wavelengths (0.47, 0.652, and 0.937 μm). Particle samples were obtained from Duke Scientific Corp., and include aluminum oxide, silicon carbide, aluminum silicate, antimony oxide, calcium carbonate, and cerium oxide. Particle equivalent-sphere radii range from a few tenths of a micron to about 10 μm. The particles were injected into a laboratory chamber, where they scattered light as they fell through the air. They were collected on a scanning electron micrograph (SEM) substrate. Particle shapes and sizes were then measured from the SEM images. We compare measured phase functions with those calculated for spheroids with a distribution of axial ratios and sizes, random orientation, and refractive index 1.53 + 0.008i [Mishchenko et al., this issue]. Two of the samples (one of which has a refractive index close to that used in theoretical computations) produced scattering phase functions that were quite similar to those for spheroids. Two samples produced phase functions whose variation between 15° and 170° was much less than that for the spheroids or for the other samples. We suspect this difference may be due to the very high refractive index of those particles, although differences in particle microstructure may also be important. Two samples produced positive linear polarization which had a single broad maximum near 100° scattering angle, and a magnitude greater than 40% at some wavelengths. Two samples had generally positive linear polarization but a more complicated structure, and two samples produced mostly negative polarization whose amplitude was small. We do not have numerical results for the appropriate refractive index and size parameter with which to compare the polarization measurements. We hope the questions raised by this work will stimulate additional effort to develop and test numerical codes for scattering by nonspherical particles.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)16871-16881
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics
Volume102
Issue number14
StatePublished - Jul 27 1997

Fingerprint

linear polarization
Minerals
Dust
polarization
dust
scattering
minerals
Scattering
Polarization
Refractive index
mineral
refractive index
Wavelength
spheroids
Particles (particulate matter)
Aluminum Silicates
refractivity
Scanning
Electrons
Aluminum Oxide

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geochemistry and Petrology
  • Geophysics
  • Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Space and Planetary Science
  • Atmospheric Science
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
  • Oceanography
  • Earth and Planetary Sciences(all)
  • Environmental Science(all)

Cite this

Laboratory measurements of mineral dust scattering phase function and linear polarization. / West, Robert A.; Doose, Lyn R.; Eibl, Andrew M.; Tomasko, Martin G; Mishchenko, Michael I.

In: Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, Vol. 102, No. 14, 27.07.1997, p. 16871-16881.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

West, Robert A. ; Doose, Lyn R. ; Eibl, Andrew M. ; Tomasko, Martin G ; Mishchenko, Michael I. / Laboratory measurements of mineral dust scattering phase function and linear polarization. In: Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics. 1997 ; Vol. 102, No. 14. pp. 16871-16881.
@article{49785afdede345fdb93bd91ba083114e,
title = "Laboratory measurements of mineral dust scattering phase function and linear polarization",
abstract = "With the goal of improving our understanding of how small mineral dust particles scatter light at visible and near-infrared wavelengths, we measured the scattering phase function and linear polarization of small mineral dust particles over the scattering angle range 15°-170° at three wavelengths (0.47, 0.652, and 0.937 μm). Particle samples were obtained from Duke Scientific Corp., and include aluminum oxide, silicon carbide, aluminum silicate, antimony oxide, calcium carbonate, and cerium oxide. Particle equivalent-sphere radii range from a few tenths of a micron to about 10 μm. The particles were injected into a laboratory chamber, where they scattered light as they fell through the air. They were collected on a scanning electron micrograph (SEM) substrate. Particle shapes and sizes were then measured from the SEM images. We compare measured phase functions with those calculated for spheroids with a distribution of axial ratios and sizes, random orientation, and refractive index 1.53 + 0.008i [Mishchenko et al., this issue]. Two of the samples (one of which has a refractive index close to that used in theoretical computations) produced scattering phase functions that were quite similar to those for spheroids. Two samples produced phase functions whose variation between 15° and 170° was much less than that for the spheroids or for the other samples. We suspect this difference may be due to the very high refractive index of those particles, although differences in particle microstructure may also be important. Two samples produced positive linear polarization which had a single broad maximum near 100° scattering angle, and a magnitude greater than 40{\%} at some wavelengths. Two samples had generally positive linear polarization but a more complicated structure, and two samples produced mostly negative polarization whose amplitude was small. We do not have numerical results for the appropriate refractive index and size parameter with which to compare the polarization measurements. We hope the questions raised by this work will stimulate additional effort to develop and test numerical codes for scattering by nonspherical particles.",
author = "West, {Robert A.} and Doose, {Lyn R.} and Eibl, {Andrew M.} and Tomasko, {Martin G} and Mishchenko, {Michael I.}",
year = "1997",
month = "7",
day = "27",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "102",
pages = "16871--16881",
journal = "Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics",
issn = "2169-9380",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "14",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Laboratory measurements of mineral dust scattering phase function and linear polarization

AU - West, Robert A.

AU - Doose, Lyn R.

AU - Eibl, Andrew M.

AU - Tomasko, Martin G

AU - Mishchenko, Michael I.

PY - 1997/7/27

Y1 - 1997/7/27

N2 - With the goal of improving our understanding of how small mineral dust particles scatter light at visible and near-infrared wavelengths, we measured the scattering phase function and linear polarization of small mineral dust particles over the scattering angle range 15°-170° at three wavelengths (0.47, 0.652, and 0.937 μm). Particle samples were obtained from Duke Scientific Corp., and include aluminum oxide, silicon carbide, aluminum silicate, antimony oxide, calcium carbonate, and cerium oxide. Particle equivalent-sphere radii range from a few tenths of a micron to about 10 μm. The particles were injected into a laboratory chamber, where they scattered light as they fell through the air. They were collected on a scanning electron micrograph (SEM) substrate. Particle shapes and sizes were then measured from the SEM images. We compare measured phase functions with those calculated for spheroids with a distribution of axial ratios and sizes, random orientation, and refractive index 1.53 + 0.008i [Mishchenko et al., this issue]. Two of the samples (one of which has a refractive index close to that used in theoretical computations) produced scattering phase functions that were quite similar to those for spheroids. Two samples produced phase functions whose variation between 15° and 170° was much less than that for the spheroids or for the other samples. We suspect this difference may be due to the very high refractive index of those particles, although differences in particle microstructure may also be important. Two samples produced positive linear polarization which had a single broad maximum near 100° scattering angle, and a magnitude greater than 40% at some wavelengths. Two samples had generally positive linear polarization but a more complicated structure, and two samples produced mostly negative polarization whose amplitude was small. We do not have numerical results for the appropriate refractive index and size parameter with which to compare the polarization measurements. We hope the questions raised by this work will stimulate additional effort to develop and test numerical codes for scattering by nonspherical particles.

AB - With the goal of improving our understanding of how small mineral dust particles scatter light at visible and near-infrared wavelengths, we measured the scattering phase function and linear polarization of small mineral dust particles over the scattering angle range 15°-170° at three wavelengths (0.47, 0.652, and 0.937 μm). Particle samples were obtained from Duke Scientific Corp., and include aluminum oxide, silicon carbide, aluminum silicate, antimony oxide, calcium carbonate, and cerium oxide. Particle equivalent-sphere radii range from a few tenths of a micron to about 10 μm. The particles were injected into a laboratory chamber, where they scattered light as they fell through the air. They were collected on a scanning electron micrograph (SEM) substrate. Particle shapes and sizes were then measured from the SEM images. We compare measured phase functions with those calculated for spheroids with a distribution of axial ratios and sizes, random orientation, and refractive index 1.53 + 0.008i [Mishchenko et al., this issue]. Two of the samples (one of which has a refractive index close to that used in theoretical computations) produced scattering phase functions that were quite similar to those for spheroids. Two samples produced phase functions whose variation between 15° and 170° was much less than that for the spheroids or for the other samples. We suspect this difference may be due to the very high refractive index of those particles, although differences in particle microstructure may also be important. Two samples produced positive linear polarization which had a single broad maximum near 100° scattering angle, and a magnitude greater than 40% at some wavelengths. Two samples had generally positive linear polarization but a more complicated structure, and two samples produced mostly negative polarization whose amplitude was small. We do not have numerical results for the appropriate refractive index and size parameter with which to compare the polarization measurements. We hope the questions raised by this work will stimulate additional effort to develop and test numerical codes for scattering by nonspherical particles.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031395485&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031395485&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0031395485

VL - 102

SP - 16871

EP - 16881

JO - Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics

JF - Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics

SN - 2169-9380

IS - 14

ER -