Land application of manure and class B biosolids: An occupational and public quantitative microbial risk assessment

John P. Brooks, Michael R. McLaughlin, Charles P Gerba, Ian L Pepper

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

35 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Land application is a practical use of municipal Class B biosolids and manure that also promotes soil fertility and productivity. To date, no study exists comparing biosolids to manure microbial risks. Th is study used quantitative microbial risk assessment to estimate pathogen risks from occupational and public exposures during scenarios involving fomite, soil, crop, and aerosol exposures. Greatest one-time risks were from direct consumption of contaminated soil or exposure to fomites, with one-time risks greater than 10-1.Recent contamination and high exposures doses increased most risks. Campylobacter jejuni and enteric viruses provided the greatest single risks for most scenarios, particularly in the short term. All pathogen risks were decreased with time, 1 d to14 mo between land application and exposure; decreases in risk were typically over six orders of magnitude beyond 30 d. Nearly all risks were reduced to below 10-4 when using a 4-mo harvest delay for crop consumption. Occupational, more direct risks were greater than indirect public risks, which oft en occur aft er time and dilution have reduced pathogen loads to tolerablelevels. Comparison of risks by pathogen group confirmed greater bacterial risks from manure, whereas viral risks were exclusive to biosolids. A direct comparison of the two residual types showed that biosolids use had greater risk because of the high infectivity of viruses, whereas the presence of environmentally recalcitrant pathogens such as Cryptosporidium and Listeria maintained manure risk. Direct comparisons of shared pathogens resulted in greater manure risks. Overall, it appears thatin the short term, risks were high for both types of residuals, but given treatment, attenuation, and dilution, risks can be reduced to nearinsignificant levels Thatbeing said, limited data sets, dose exposures, site-specific inactivation rates, pathogen spikes, environmental change, regrowth, and wildlife will increase risk anduncertainty and remain areas poorly understood.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2009-2023
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Environmental Quality
Volume41
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2012

Fingerprint

Biosolids
Manures
biosolid
Risk assessment
manure
risk assessment
Pathogens
pathogen
public
land
Soils
Viruses
Dilution
Crops
virus
dilution
Public risks
Listeria

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Engineering
  • Pollution
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
  • Waste Management and Disposal
  • Water Science and Technology

Cite this

Land application of manure and class B biosolids : An occupational and public quantitative microbial risk assessment. / Brooks, John P.; McLaughlin, Michael R.; Gerba, Charles P; Pepper, Ian L.

In: Journal of Environmental Quality, Vol. 41, No. 6, 11.2012, p. 2009-2023.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6bacc928145b4f96afeb40c1f259718e,
title = "Land application of manure and class B biosolids: An occupational and public quantitative microbial risk assessment",
abstract = "Land application is a practical use of municipal Class B biosolids and manure that also promotes soil fertility and productivity. To date, no study exists comparing biosolids to manure microbial risks. Th is study used quantitative microbial risk assessment to estimate pathogen risks from occupational and public exposures during scenarios involving fomite, soil, crop, and aerosol exposures. Greatest one-time risks were from direct consumption of contaminated soil or exposure to fomites, with one-time risks greater than 10-1.Recent contamination and high exposures doses increased most risks. Campylobacter jejuni and enteric viruses provided the greatest single risks for most scenarios, particularly in the short term. All pathogen risks were decreased with time, 1 d to14 mo between land application and exposure; decreases in risk were typically over six orders of magnitude beyond 30 d. Nearly all risks were reduced to below 10-4 when using a 4-mo harvest delay for crop consumption. Occupational, more direct risks were greater than indirect public risks, which oft en occur aft er time and dilution have reduced pathogen loads to tolerablelevels. Comparison of risks by pathogen group confirmed greater bacterial risks from manure, whereas viral risks were exclusive to biosolids. A direct comparison of the two residual types showed that biosolids use had greater risk because of the high infectivity of viruses, whereas the presence of environmentally recalcitrant pathogens such as Cryptosporidium and Listeria maintained manure risk. Direct comparisons of shared pathogens resulted in greater manure risks. Overall, it appears thatin the short term, risks were high for both types of residuals, but given treatment, attenuation, and dilution, risks can be reduced to nearinsignificant levels Thatbeing said, limited data sets, dose exposures, site-specific inactivation rates, pathogen spikes, environmental change, regrowth, and wildlife will increase risk anduncertainty and remain areas poorly understood.",
author = "Brooks, {John P.} and McLaughlin, {Michael R.} and Gerba, {Charles P} and Pepper, {Ian L}",
year = "2012",
month = "11",
doi = "10.2134/jeq2011.0430",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "41",
pages = "2009--2023",
journal = "Journal of Environmental Quality",
issn = "0047-2425",
publisher = "ASA/CSSA/SSSA",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Land application of manure and class B biosolids

T2 - An occupational and public quantitative microbial risk assessment

AU - Brooks, John P.

AU - McLaughlin, Michael R.

AU - Gerba, Charles P

AU - Pepper, Ian L

PY - 2012/11

Y1 - 2012/11

N2 - Land application is a practical use of municipal Class B biosolids and manure that also promotes soil fertility and productivity. To date, no study exists comparing biosolids to manure microbial risks. Th is study used quantitative microbial risk assessment to estimate pathogen risks from occupational and public exposures during scenarios involving fomite, soil, crop, and aerosol exposures. Greatest one-time risks were from direct consumption of contaminated soil or exposure to fomites, with one-time risks greater than 10-1.Recent contamination and high exposures doses increased most risks. Campylobacter jejuni and enteric viruses provided the greatest single risks for most scenarios, particularly in the short term. All pathogen risks were decreased with time, 1 d to14 mo between land application and exposure; decreases in risk were typically over six orders of magnitude beyond 30 d. Nearly all risks were reduced to below 10-4 when using a 4-mo harvest delay for crop consumption. Occupational, more direct risks were greater than indirect public risks, which oft en occur aft er time and dilution have reduced pathogen loads to tolerablelevels. Comparison of risks by pathogen group confirmed greater bacterial risks from manure, whereas viral risks were exclusive to biosolids. A direct comparison of the two residual types showed that biosolids use had greater risk because of the high infectivity of viruses, whereas the presence of environmentally recalcitrant pathogens such as Cryptosporidium and Listeria maintained manure risk. Direct comparisons of shared pathogens resulted in greater manure risks. Overall, it appears thatin the short term, risks were high for both types of residuals, but given treatment, attenuation, and dilution, risks can be reduced to nearinsignificant levels Thatbeing said, limited data sets, dose exposures, site-specific inactivation rates, pathogen spikes, environmental change, regrowth, and wildlife will increase risk anduncertainty and remain areas poorly understood.

AB - Land application is a practical use of municipal Class B biosolids and manure that also promotes soil fertility and productivity. To date, no study exists comparing biosolids to manure microbial risks. Th is study used quantitative microbial risk assessment to estimate pathogen risks from occupational and public exposures during scenarios involving fomite, soil, crop, and aerosol exposures. Greatest one-time risks were from direct consumption of contaminated soil or exposure to fomites, with one-time risks greater than 10-1.Recent contamination and high exposures doses increased most risks. Campylobacter jejuni and enteric viruses provided the greatest single risks for most scenarios, particularly in the short term. All pathogen risks were decreased with time, 1 d to14 mo between land application and exposure; decreases in risk were typically over six orders of magnitude beyond 30 d. Nearly all risks were reduced to below 10-4 when using a 4-mo harvest delay for crop consumption. Occupational, more direct risks were greater than indirect public risks, which oft en occur aft er time and dilution have reduced pathogen loads to tolerablelevels. Comparison of risks by pathogen group confirmed greater bacterial risks from manure, whereas viral risks were exclusive to biosolids. A direct comparison of the two residual types showed that biosolids use had greater risk because of the high infectivity of viruses, whereas the presence of environmentally recalcitrant pathogens such as Cryptosporidium and Listeria maintained manure risk. Direct comparisons of shared pathogens resulted in greater manure risks. Overall, it appears thatin the short term, risks were high for both types of residuals, but given treatment, attenuation, and dilution, risks can be reduced to nearinsignificant levels Thatbeing said, limited data sets, dose exposures, site-specific inactivation rates, pathogen spikes, environmental change, regrowth, and wildlife will increase risk anduncertainty and remain areas poorly understood.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84869438866&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84869438866&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2134/jeq2011.0430

DO - 10.2134/jeq2011.0430

M3 - Article

C2 - 23128758

AN - SCOPUS:84869438866

VL - 41

SP - 2009

EP - 2023

JO - Journal of Environmental Quality

JF - Journal of Environmental Quality

SN - 0047-2425

IS - 6

ER -