Land in balance: The scientific conceptual framework for Land Degradation Neutrality

Annette L. Cowie, Barron J. Orr, Victor M. Castillo Sanchez, Pamela Chasek, Neville D. Crossman, Alexander Erlewein, Geertrui Louwagie, Martine Maron, Graciela I. Metternicht, Sara Minelli, Anna E. Tengberg, Sven Walter, Shelley Welton

Research output: Research - peer-reviewArticle

Abstract

The health and productivity of global land resources are declining, while demand for those resources is increasing. The aim of land degradation neutrality (LDN) is to maintain or enhance land-based natural capital and its associated ecosystem services. The Scientific Conceptual Framework for Land Degradation Neutrality has been developed to provide a scientific approach to planning, implementing and monitoring LDN. The Science-Policy Interface of the United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD) led the development of the conceptual framework, drawing in expertise from a diverse range of disciplines. The LDN conceptual framework focuses on the supporting processes required to deliver LDN, including biophysical and socio-economic aspects, and their interactions. Neutrality implies no net loss of the land-based natural capital relative to a reference state, or baseline. Planning for neutrality involves projecting the likely cumulative impacts of land use and land management decisions, then counterbalancing anticipated losses with measures to achieve equivalent gains. Counterbalancing should occur only within individual land types, distinguished by land potential, to ensure “like for like” exchanges. Actions to achieve LDN include sustainable land management (SLM) practices that avoid or reduce degradation, coupled with efforts to reverse degradation through restoration or rehabilitation of degraded land. The response hierarchy of Avoid > Reduce > Reverse land degradation articulates the priorities in planning LDN interventions. The implementation of LDN is managed at the landscape level through integrated land use planning, while achievement is assessed at national level. Monitoring LDN status involves quantifying the balance between the area of gains (significant positive changes in LDN indicators) and area of losses (significant negative changes in LDN indicators), within each land type across the landscape. The LDN indicators (and associated metrics) are land cover (physical land cover class), land productivity (net primary productivity, NPP) and carbon stocks (soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks). The LDN conceptual framework comprises five modules: A: Vision of LDN describes the intended outcome of LDN; B: Frame of Reference clarifies the LDN baseline; C: Mechanism for Neutrality explains the counterbalancing mechanism; D: Achieving Neutrality presents the theory of change (logic model) articulating the impact pathway; and E: Monitoring Neutrality presents the LDN indicators. Principles that govern application of the framework provide flexibility while reducing risk of unintended outcomes.

LanguageEnglish (US)
Pages25-35
Number of pages11
JournalEnvironmental Science and Policy
Volume79
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

land degradation
conceptual framework
land
neutrality
indicator
productivity
monitoring
loss
planning
land type
natural capital
land management
land cover
degradation
resource
land use
resources
desertification
United Nations
land use planning

Keywords

  • Integrated land use planning
  • Land degradation
  • Neutrality
  • Response hierarchy
  • Sustainable development goals
  • Sustainable land management

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

Cowie, A. L., Orr, B. J., Castillo Sanchez, V. M., Chasek, P., Crossman, N. D., Erlewein, A., ... Welton, S. (2018). Land in balance: The scientific conceptual framework for Land Degradation Neutrality. Environmental Science and Policy, 79, 25-35. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.10.011

Land in balance : The scientific conceptual framework for Land Degradation Neutrality. / Cowie, Annette L.; Orr, Barron J.; Castillo Sanchez, Victor M.; Chasek, Pamela; Crossman, Neville D.; Erlewein, Alexander; Louwagie, Geertrui; Maron, Martine; Metternicht, Graciela I.; Minelli, Sara; Tengberg, Anna E.; Walter, Sven; Welton, Shelley.

In: Environmental Science and Policy, Vol. 79, 01.01.2018, p. 25-35.

Research output: Research - peer-reviewArticle

Cowie, AL, Orr, BJ, Castillo Sanchez, VM, Chasek, P, Crossman, ND, Erlewein, A, Louwagie, G, Maron, M, Metternicht, GI, Minelli, S, Tengberg, AE, Walter, S & Welton, S 2018, 'Land in balance: The scientific conceptual framework for Land Degradation Neutrality' Environmental Science and Policy, vol 79, pp. 25-35. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.10.011
Cowie AL, Orr BJ, Castillo Sanchez VM, Chasek P, Crossman ND, Erlewein A et al. Land in balance: The scientific conceptual framework for Land Degradation Neutrality. Environmental Science and Policy. 2018 Jan 1;79:25-35. Available from, DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.10.011
Cowie, Annette L. ; Orr, Barron J. ; Castillo Sanchez, Victor M. ; Chasek, Pamela ; Crossman, Neville D. ; Erlewein, Alexander ; Louwagie, Geertrui ; Maron, Martine ; Metternicht, Graciela I. ; Minelli, Sara ; Tengberg, Anna E. ; Walter, Sven ; Welton, Shelley. / Land in balance : The scientific conceptual framework for Land Degradation Neutrality. In: Environmental Science and Policy. 2018 ; Vol. 79. pp. 25-35
@article{de6459baf51f41faa113ef282282d2b5,
title = "Land in balance: The scientific conceptual framework for Land Degradation Neutrality",
abstract = "The health and productivity of global land resources are declining, while demand for those resources is increasing. The aim of land degradation neutrality (LDN) is to maintain or enhance land-based natural capital and its associated ecosystem services. The Scientific Conceptual Framework for Land Degradation Neutrality has been developed to provide a scientific approach to planning, implementing and monitoring LDN. The Science-Policy Interface of the United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD) led the development of the conceptual framework, drawing in expertise from a diverse range of disciplines. The LDN conceptual framework focuses on the supporting processes required to deliver LDN, including biophysical and socio-economic aspects, and their interactions. Neutrality implies no net loss of the land-based natural capital relative to a reference state, or baseline. Planning for neutrality involves projecting the likely cumulative impacts of land use and land management decisions, then counterbalancing anticipated losses with measures to achieve equivalent gains. Counterbalancing should occur only within individual land types, distinguished by land potential, to ensure “like for like” exchanges. Actions to achieve LDN include sustainable land management (SLM) practices that avoid or reduce degradation, coupled with efforts to reverse degradation through restoration or rehabilitation of degraded land. The response hierarchy of Avoid > Reduce > Reverse land degradation articulates the priorities in planning LDN interventions. The implementation of LDN is managed at the landscape level through integrated land use planning, while achievement is assessed at national level. Monitoring LDN status involves quantifying the balance between the area of gains (significant positive changes in LDN indicators) and area of losses (significant negative changes in LDN indicators), within each land type across the landscape. The LDN indicators (and associated metrics) are land cover (physical land cover class), land productivity (net primary productivity, NPP) and carbon stocks (soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks). The LDN conceptual framework comprises five modules: A: Vision of LDN describes the intended outcome of LDN; B: Frame of Reference clarifies the LDN baseline; C: Mechanism for Neutrality explains the counterbalancing mechanism; D: Achieving Neutrality presents the theory of change (logic model) articulating the impact pathway; and E: Monitoring Neutrality presents the LDN indicators. Principles that govern application of the framework provide flexibility while reducing risk of unintended outcomes.",
keywords = "Integrated land use planning, Land degradation, Neutrality, Response hierarchy, Sustainable development goals, Sustainable land management",
author = "Cowie, {Annette L.} and Orr, {Barron J.} and {Castillo Sanchez}, {Victor M.} and Pamela Chasek and Crossman, {Neville D.} and Alexander Erlewein and Geertrui Louwagie and Martine Maron and Metternicht, {Graciela I.} and Sara Minelli and Tengberg, {Anna E.} and Sven Walter and Shelley Welton",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.envsci.2017.10.011",
volume = "79",
pages = "25--35",
journal = "Environmental Science and Policy",
issn = "1462-9011",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Land in balance

T2 - Environmental Science and Policy

AU - Cowie,Annette L.

AU - Orr,Barron J.

AU - Castillo Sanchez,Victor M.

AU - Chasek,Pamela

AU - Crossman,Neville D.

AU - Erlewein,Alexander

AU - Louwagie,Geertrui

AU - Maron,Martine

AU - Metternicht,Graciela I.

AU - Minelli,Sara

AU - Tengberg,Anna E.

AU - Walter,Sven

AU - Welton,Shelley

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - The health and productivity of global land resources are declining, while demand for those resources is increasing. The aim of land degradation neutrality (LDN) is to maintain or enhance land-based natural capital and its associated ecosystem services. The Scientific Conceptual Framework for Land Degradation Neutrality has been developed to provide a scientific approach to planning, implementing and monitoring LDN. The Science-Policy Interface of the United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD) led the development of the conceptual framework, drawing in expertise from a diverse range of disciplines. The LDN conceptual framework focuses on the supporting processes required to deliver LDN, including biophysical and socio-economic aspects, and their interactions. Neutrality implies no net loss of the land-based natural capital relative to a reference state, or baseline. Planning for neutrality involves projecting the likely cumulative impacts of land use and land management decisions, then counterbalancing anticipated losses with measures to achieve equivalent gains. Counterbalancing should occur only within individual land types, distinguished by land potential, to ensure “like for like” exchanges. Actions to achieve LDN include sustainable land management (SLM) practices that avoid or reduce degradation, coupled with efforts to reverse degradation through restoration or rehabilitation of degraded land. The response hierarchy of Avoid > Reduce > Reverse land degradation articulates the priorities in planning LDN interventions. The implementation of LDN is managed at the landscape level through integrated land use planning, while achievement is assessed at national level. Monitoring LDN status involves quantifying the balance between the area of gains (significant positive changes in LDN indicators) and area of losses (significant negative changes in LDN indicators), within each land type across the landscape. The LDN indicators (and associated metrics) are land cover (physical land cover class), land productivity (net primary productivity, NPP) and carbon stocks (soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks). The LDN conceptual framework comprises five modules: A: Vision of LDN describes the intended outcome of LDN; B: Frame of Reference clarifies the LDN baseline; C: Mechanism for Neutrality explains the counterbalancing mechanism; D: Achieving Neutrality presents the theory of change (logic model) articulating the impact pathway; and E: Monitoring Neutrality presents the LDN indicators. Principles that govern application of the framework provide flexibility while reducing risk of unintended outcomes.

AB - The health and productivity of global land resources are declining, while demand for those resources is increasing. The aim of land degradation neutrality (LDN) is to maintain or enhance land-based natural capital and its associated ecosystem services. The Scientific Conceptual Framework for Land Degradation Neutrality has been developed to provide a scientific approach to planning, implementing and monitoring LDN. The Science-Policy Interface of the United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD) led the development of the conceptual framework, drawing in expertise from a diverse range of disciplines. The LDN conceptual framework focuses on the supporting processes required to deliver LDN, including biophysical and socio-economic aspects, and their interactions. Neutrality implies no net loss of the land-based natural capital relative to a reference state, or baseline. Planning for neutrality involves projecting the likely cumulative impacts of land use and land management decisions, then counterbalancing anticipated losses with measures to achieve equivalent gains. Counterbalancing should occur only within individual land types, distinguished by land potential, to ensure “like for like” exchanges. Actions to achieve LDN include sustainable land management (SLM) practices that avoid or reduce degradation, coupled with efforts to reverse degradation through restoration or rehabilitation of degraded land. The response hierarchy of Avoid > Reduce > Reverse land degradation articulates the priorities in planning LDN interventions. The implementation of LDN is managed at the landscape level through integrated land use planning, while achievement is assessed at national level. Monitoring LDN status involves quantifying the balance between the area of gains (significant positive changes in LDN indicators) and area of losses (significant negative changes in LDN indicators), within each land type across the landscape. The LDN indicators (and associated metrics) are land cover (physical land cover class), land productivity (net primary productivity, NPP) and carbon stocks (soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks). The LDN conceptual framework comprises five modules: A: Vision of LDN describes the intended outcome of LDN; B: Frame of Reference clarifies the LDN baseline; C: Mechanism for Neutrality explains the counterbalancing mechanism; D: Achieving Neutrality presents the theory of change (logic model) articulating the impact pathway; and E: Monitoring Neutrality presents the LDN indicators. Principles that govern application of the framework provide flexibility while reducing risk of unintended outcomes.

KW - Integrated land use planning

KW - Land degradation

KW - Neutrality

KW - Response hierarchy

KW - Sustainable development goals

KW - Sustainable land management

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85032218708&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85032218708&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.10.011

DO - 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.10.011

M3 - Article

VL - 79

SP - 25

EP - 35

JO - Environmental Science and Policy

JF - Environmental Science and Policy

SN - 1462-9011

ER -