Language matches: Illuminating or confounding?

Elena M Plante, L. Swisher, Barbara J Kiernan, M. A. Restrepo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

55 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The practice of matching younger, language-matched controls, in addition to age-matched controls, is often used in studies of language-disordered children to examine the role of 'language level' on performance. However, the interpretation of the relative performance of subjects in studies using such dual control groups is problematic. Conceptual concerns arise with the use of language matches because language is a multidimensional skill that is not reflected equivalently for the language-disordered children and their language-matched controls. Furthermore, matching by language level inevitably introduces an extraneous age effect that confounds interpretation. In addition, erroneous interpretations of null findings can occur when no differences are found between language-disordered and language-matched groups.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)772-776
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Speech and Hearing Research
Volume36
Issue number4
StatePublished - 1993

Fingerprint

Language
language
Child Language
interpretation
language group
Research Design
performance
Control Groups
Group

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

Language matches : Illuminating or confounding? / Plante, Elena M; Swisher, L.; Kiernan, Barbara J; Restrepo, M. A.

In: Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, Vol. 36, No. 4, 1993, p. 772-776.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6b2e996cfdc44ab780a1b1948c3c496e,
title = "Language matches: Illuminating or confounding?",
abstract = "The practice of matching younger, language-matched controls, in addition to age-matched controls, is often used in studies of language-disordered children to examine the role of 'language level' on performance. However, the interpretation of the relative performance of subjects in studies using such dual control groups is problematic. Conceptual concerns arise with the use of language matches because language is a multidimensional skill that is not reflected equivalently for the language-disordered children and their language-matched controls. Furthermore, matching by language level inevitably introduces an extraneous age effect that confounds interpretation. In addition, erroneous interpretations of null findings can occur when no differences are found between language-disordered and language-matched groups.",
author = "Plante, {Elena M} and L. Swisher and Kiernan, {Barbara J} and Restrepo, {M. A.}",
year = "1993",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
pages = "772--776",
journal = "Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research",
issn = "1092-4388",
publisher = "American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA)",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Language matches

T2 - Illuminating or confounding?

AU - Plante, Elena M

AU - Swisher, L.

AU - Kiernan, Barbara J

AU - Restrepo, M. A.

PY - 1993

Y1 - 1993

N2 - The practice of matching younger, language-matched controls, in addition to age-matched controls, is often used in studies of language-disordered children to examine the role of 'language level' on performance. However, the interpretation of the relative performance of subjects in studies using such dual control groups is problematic. Conceptual concerns arise with the use of language matches because language is a multidimensional skill that is not reflected equivalently for the language-disordered children and their language-matched controls. Furthermore, matching by language level inevitably introduces an extraneous age effect that confounds interpretation. In addition, erroneous interpretations of null findings can occur when no differences are found between language-disordered and language-matched groups.

AB - The practice of matching younger, language-matched controls, in addition to age-matched controls, is often used in studies of language-disordered children to examine the role of 'language level' on performance. However, the interpretation of the relative performance of subjects in studies using such dual control groups is problematic. Conceptual concerns arise with the use of language matches because language is a multidimensional skill that is not reflected equivalently for the language-disordered children and their language-matched controls. Furthermore, matching by language level inevitably introduces an extraneous age effect that confounds interpretation. In addition, erroneous interpretations of null findings can occur when no differences are found between language-disordered and language-matched groups.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027297204&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027297204&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 8377489

AN - SCOPUS:0027297204

VL - 36

SP - 772

EP - 776

JO - Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research

JF - Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research

SN - 1092-4388

IS - 4

ER -