Lay observers, telegraph lines, and Kansas weather: The field network as a mode of knowledge production

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Argument This paper examines the field network - linking together lay observers in geographically distributed locations with a central figure who aggregated their locally produced observations into more general, regional knowledge - as a historically emergent mode of knowledge production. After discussing the significance of weather knowledge as a vital domain in which field networks have operated, it describes and analyzes how a more robust and systematized weather observing field network became established and maintained on the ground in the early twentieth century. This case study, which examines two Kansas City-based local observer networks supervised by the same U.S. Weather Bureau office, demonstrates some of the key issues involved in maintaining field networks, such as the role of communications infrastructure, especially the telegraph, the procedures designed to make local observation more systematic and uniform, and the centralized, hierarchical power relations that underpinned even a low-status example of knowledge production on the periphery.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)259-280
Number of pages22
JournalScience in Context
Volume24
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2011

Fingerprint

knowledge production
communications
twentieth century
Weather
Knowledge Production
Telegraph
Lay
Observer
infrastructure

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences(all)
  • History and Philosophy of Science

Cite this

Lay observers, telegraph lines, and Kansas weather : The field network as a mode of knowledge production. / Vetter, Jeremy A.

In: Science in Context, Vol. 24, No. 2, 06.2011, p. 259-280.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f7701b1b164e403092e4f2d106128218,
title = "Lay observers, telegraph lines, and Kansas weather: The field network as a mode of knowledge production",
abstract = "Argument This paper examines the field network - linking together lay observers in geographically distributed locations with a central figure who aggregated their locally produced observations into more general, regional knowledge - as a historically emergent mode of knowledge production. After discussing the significance of weather knowledge as a vital domain in which field networks have operated, it describes and analyzes how a more robust and systematized weather observing field network became established and maintained on the ground in the early twentieth century. This case study, which examines two Kansas City-based local observer networks supervised by the same U.S. Weather Bureau office, demonstrates some of the key issues involved in maintaining field networks, such as the role of communications infrastructure, especially the telegraph, the procedures designed to make local observation more systematic and uniform, and the centralized, hierarchical power relations that underpinned even a low-status example of knowledge production on the periphery.",
author = "Vetter, {Jeremy A}",
year = "2011",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1017/S0269889711000093",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "259--280",
journal = "Science in Context",
issn = "0269-8897",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Lay observers, telegraph lines, and Kansas weather

T2 - The field network as a mode of knowledge production

AU - Vetter, Jeremy A

PY - 2011/6

Y1 - 2011/6

N2 - Argument This paper examines the field network - linking together lay observers in geographically distributed locations with a central figure who aggregated their locally produced observations into more general, regional knowledge - as a historically emergent mode of knowledge production. After discussing the significance of weather knowledge as a vital domain in which field networks have operated, it describes and analyzes how a more robust and systematized weather observing field network became established and maintained on the ground in the early twentieth century. This case study, which examines two Kansas City-based local observer networks supervised by the same U.S. Weather Bureau office, demonstrates some of the key issues involved in maintaining field networks, such as the role of communications infrastructure, especially the telegraph, the procedures designed to make local observation more systematic and uniform, and the centralized, hierarchical power relations that underpinned even a low-status example of knowledge production on the periphery.

AB - Argument This paper examines the field network - linking together lay observers in geographically distributed locations with a central figure who aggregated their locally produced observations into more general, regional knowledge - as a historically emergent mode of knowledge production. After discussing the significance of weather knowledge as a vital domain in which field networks have operated, it describes and analyzes how a more robust and systematized weather observing field network became established and maintained on the ground in the early twentieth century. This case study, which examines two Kansas City-based local observer networks supervised by the same U.S. Weather Bureau office, demonstrates some of the key issues involved in maintaining field networks, such as the role of communications infrastructure, especially the telegraph, the procedures designed to make local observation more systematic and uniform, and the centralized, hierarchical power relations that underpinned even a low-status example of knowledge production on the periphery.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79956152641&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79956152641&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S0269889711000093

DO - 10.1017/S0269889711000093

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:79956152641

VL - 24

SP - 259

EP - 280

JO - Science in Context

JF - Science in Context

SN - 0269-8897

IS - 2

ER -