Learning and teaching advanced laparoscopic procedures: Do alternating trainees impair a laparoscopic surgeon's learning curve?

Markus C. Fleisch, J. Newton, Ina Steinmetz, Jennifer Whitehair, Alton Hallum, Kenneth D Hatch

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Study Objective: In this study we investigated whether teaching advanced laparoscopic procedures like laparoscopic-assisted surgical staging (LASS) for endometrial cancer negatively affects the learning curve of the attending surgeon. Design: Retrospective study (Canadian Task Force classification II-3.). Setting: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Arizona, Tucson. Patients: One hundred twenty-four patients undergoing LASS for endometrial cancer at our institution from 1992 through 2004 were included for analysis. Interventions: Cases were classified into 3 groups. Group A comprised the initial learning phase where 2 attending gynecologic oncologists used other faculty as assistants (first 30 cases). Groups B and C comprised procedures after the learning phase involving attendings (n = 27, group B) or obstetrics and gynecology residents (n = 67, group C) as trainees. Groups were compared with respect to general outcome parameters and disease-free survival. Measurements and Main Results: Patients within all groups were comparable with respect to age and height or body mass index. In the subgroup analysis, a decrease in blood loss and length of stay occurred mainly during the group B series. Pelvic lymph node yield reached oncologic standards during the initial learning curve (median 12-13) and remained stable during both teaching phases. Intraoperative and postoperative complications occurred in 2.4% and 13.7% of cases, respectively. Ninety percent of intraoperative and 64% of postoperative complications occurred within the first half of the series and were not correlated with type of assistance. Survival data were obtainable in 65% of cases with a median follow-up of 3.6 years. Disease free-survival was 92.5% in stage I disease and without significant difference among the groups. Conclusion: After gaining proficiency in the procedure, more or less surgically experienced trainees can be actively included without hampering the progress of the attending's learning curve.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)293-299
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology
Volume14
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2007

Fingerprint

Learning Curve
Teaching
Learning
Endometrial Neoplasms
Gynecology
Disease-Free Survival
Hospital Obstetrics and Gynecology Department
Intraoperative Complications
Advisory Committees
Obstetrics
Length of Stay
Body Mass Index
Retrospective Studies
Lymph Nodes
Survival
Surgeons

Keywords

  • Endometrial cancer
  • Laparoscopy
  • LASS
  • Residents
  • Survival
  • Training

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Learning and teaching advanced laparoscopic procedures : Do alternating trainees impair a laparoscopic surgeon's learning curve? / Fleisch, Markus C.; Newton, J.; Steinmetz, Ina; Whitehair, Jennifer; Hallum, Alton; Hatch, Kenneth D.

In: Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, Vol. 14, No. 3, 05.2007, p. 293-299.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Fleisch, Markus C. ; Newton, J. ; Steinmetz, Ina ; Whitehair, Jennifer ; Hallum, Alton ; Hatch, Kenneth D. / Learning and teaching advanced laparoscopic procedures : Do alternating trainees impair a laparoscopic surgeon's learning curve?. In: Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology. 2007 ; Vol. 14, No. 3. pp. 293-299.
@article{85ce8f29a5c4413198f338d6b5811ea5,
title = "Learning and teaching advanced laparoscopic procedures: Do alternating trainees impair a laparoscopic surgeon's learning curve?",
abstract = "Study Objective: In this study we investigated whether teaching advanced laparoscopic procedures like laparoscopic-assisted surgical staging (LASS) for endometrial cancer negatively affects the learning curve of the attending surgeon. Design: Retrospective study (Canadian Task Force classification II-3.). Setting: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Arizona, Tucson. Patients: One hundred twenty-four patients undergoing LASS for endometrial cancer at our institution from 1992 through 2004 were included for analysis. Interventions: Cases were classified into 3 groups. Group A comprised the initial learning phase where 2 attending gynecologic oncologists used other faculty as assistants (first 30 cases). Groups B and C comprised procedures after the learning phase involving attendings (n = 27, group B) or obstetrics and gynecology residents (n = 67, group C) as trainees. Groups were compared with respect to general outcome parameters and disease-free survival. Measurements and Main Results: Patients within all groups were comparable with respect to age and height or body mass index. In the subgroup analysis, a decrease in blood loss and length of stay occurred mainly during the group B series. Pelvic lymph node yield reached oncologic standards during the initial learning curve (median 12-13) and remained stable during both teaching phases. Intraoperative and postoperative complications occurred in 2.4{\%} and 13.7{\%} of cases, respectively. Ninety percent of intraoperative and 64{\%} of postoperative complications occurred within the first half of the series and were not correlated with type of assistance. Survival data were obtainable in 65{\%} of cases with a median follow-up of 3.6 years. Disease free-survival was 92.5{\%} in stage I disease and without significant difference among the groups. Conclusion: After gaining proficiency in the procedure, more or less surgically experienced trainees can be actively included without hampering the progress of the attending's learning curve.",
keywords = "Endometrial cancer, Laparoscopy, LASS, Residents, Survival, Training",
author = "Fleisch, {Markus C.} and J. Newton and Ina Steinmetz and Jennifer Whitehair and Alton Hallum and Hatch, {Kenneth D}",
year = "2007",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1016/j.jmig.2006.10.012",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "293--299",
journal = "Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology",
issn = "1553-4650",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Learning and teaching advanced laparoscopic procedures

T2 - Do alternating trainees impair a laparoscopic surgeon's learning curve?

AU - Fleisch, Markus C.

AU - Newton, J.

AU - Steinmetz, Ina

AU - Whitehair, Jennifer

AU - Hallum, Alton

AU - Hatch, Kenneth D

PY - 2007/5

Y1 - 2007/5

N2 - Study Objective: In this study we investigated whether teaching advanced laparoscopic procedures like laparoscopic-assisted surgical staging (LASS) for endometrial cancer negatively affects the learning curve of the attending surgeon. Design: Retrospective study (Canadian Task Force classification II-3.). Setting: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Arizona, Tucson. Patients: One hundred twenty-four patients undergoing LASS for endometrial cancer at our institution from 1992 through 2004 were included for analysis. Interventions: Cases were classified into 3 groups. Group A comprised the initial learning phase where 2 attending gynecologic oncologists used other faculty as assistants (first 30 cases). Groups B and C comprised procedures after the learning phase involving attendings (n = 27, group B) or obstetrics and gynecology residents (n = 67, group C) as trainees. Groups were compared with respect to general outcome parameters and disease-free survival. Measurements and Main Results: Patients within all groups were comparable with respect to age and height or body mass index. In the subgroup analysis, a decrease in blood loss and length of stay occurred mainly during the group B series. Pelvic lymph node yield reached oncologic standards during the initial learning curve (median 12-13) and remained stable during both teaching phases. Intraoperative and postoperative complications occurred in 2.4% and 13.7% of cases, respectively. Ninety percent of intraoperative and 64% of postoperative complications occurred within the first half of the series and were not correlated with type of assistance. Survival data were obtainable in 65% of cases with a median follow-up of 3.6 years. Disease free-survival was 92.5% in stage I disease and without significant difference among the groups. Conclusion: After gaining proficiency in the procedure, more or less surgically experienced trainees can be actively included without hampering the progress of the attending's learning curve.

AB - Study Objective: In this study we investigated whether teaching advanced laparoscopic procedures like laparoscopic-assisted surgical staging (LASS) for endometrial cancer negatively affects the learning curve of the attending surgeon. Design: Retrospective study (Canadian Task Force classification II-3.). Setting: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Arizona, Tucson. Patients: One hundred twenty-four patients undergoing LASS for endometrial cancer at our institution from 1992 through 2004 were included for analysis. Interventions: Cases were classified into 3 groups. Group A comprised the initial learning phase where 2 attending gynecologic oncologists used other faculty as assistants (first 30 cases). Groups B and C comprised procedures after the learning phase involving attendings (n = 27, group B) or obstetrics and gynecology residents (n = 67, group C) as trainees. Groups were compared with respect to general outcome parameters and disease-free survival. Measurements and Main Results: Patients within all groups were comparable with respect to age and height or body mass index. In the subgroup analysis, a decrease in blood loss and length of stay occurred mainly during the group B series. Pelvic lymph node yield reached oncologic standards during the initial learning curve (median 12-13) and remained stable during both teaching phases. Intraoperative and postoperative complications occurred in 2.4% and 13.7% of cases, respectively. Ninety percent of intraoperative and 64% of postoperative complications occurred within the first half of the series and were not correlated with type of assistance. Survival data were obtainable in 65% of cases with a median follow-up of 3.6 years. Disease free-survival was 92.5% in stage I disease and without significant difference among the groups. Conclusion: After gaining proficiency in the procedure, more or less surgically experienced trainees can be actively included without hampering the progress of the attending's learning curve.

KW - Endometrial cancer

KW - Laparoscopy

KW - LASS

KW - Residents

KW - Survival

KW - Training

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34247620322&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34247620322&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jmig.2006.10.012

DO - 10.1016/j.jmig.2006.10.012

M3 - Article

C2 - 17478358

AN - SCOPUS:34247620322

VL - 14

SP - 293

EP - 299

JO - Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology

JF - Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology

SN - 1553-4650

IS - 3

ER -