Learning curves for direct laryngoscopy and glidescope® video laryngoscopy in an emergency medicine residency

John C. Sakles, Jarrod Mosier, Asad E Patanwala, John Dicken

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: Our objective is to evaluate the resident learning curves for direct laryngoscopy (DL) and GlideScope® video laryngoscopy (GVL) over the course of an emergency medicine (EM) residency training program.

Methods: This was an analysis of intubations performed in the emergency department (ED) by EM residents over a seven-year period from July 1, 2007 to June 30, 2014 at an academic ED with 70,000 annual visits. After EM residents perform an intubation in the ED they complete a continuous quality improvement (CQI) form. Data collected includes patient demographics, operator post-graduate year (PGY), difficult airway characteristics (DACs), method of intubation, device used for intubation and outcome of each attempt. We included in this analysis only adult intubations performed by EM residents using a DL or a standard reusable GVL. The primary outcome was first pass success, defined as a successful intubation with a single laryngoscope insertion. First pass success was evaluated for each PGY of training for DL and GVL. Logistic mixed-effects models were constructed for each device to determine the effect of PGY level on first pass success, after adjusting for important confounders.

Results: Over the seven-year period, the DL was used as the initial device on 1,035 patients and the GVL was used as the initial device on 578 patients by EM residents. When using the DL the first past success of PGY-1 residents was 69.9% (160/229; 95% CI 63.5%-75.7%), of PGY-2 residents was 71.7% (274/382; 95% CI 66.9%-76.2%), and of PGY-3 residents was 72.9% (309/424; 95% CI 68.4%-77.1%). When using the GVL the first pass success of PGY-1 residents was 74.4% (87/117; 95% CI 65.5%-82.0%), of PGY-2 residents was 83.6% (194/232; 95% CI 76.7%-87.7%), and of PGY-3 residents was 90.0% (206/229; 95% CI 85.3%-93.5%). In the mixed-effects model for DL, first pass success for PGY-2 and PGY-3 residents did not improve compared to PGY-1 residents (PGY-2 aOR 1.3, 95% CI 0.9-1.9; p-value 0.236) (PGY-3 aOR 1.5, 95% CI 1.0-2.2, p-value 0.067). However, in the model for GVL, first pass success for PGY-2 and PGY-3 residents improved compared to PGY-1 residents (PGY-2 aOR 2.1, 95% CI 1.1-3.8, p-value 0.021) (PGY-3 aOR 4.1, 95% CI 2.1-8.0, p< 0.001).

Conclusion: Over the course of residency training there was no significant improvement in EM resident first pass success with the DL, but substantial improvement with the GVL.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)930-937
Number of pages8
JournalWestern Journal of Emergency Medicine
Volume15
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Laryngoscopy
Learning Curve
Emergency Medicine
Internship and Residency
Intubation
Hospital Emergency Service
Equipment and Supplies
Laryngoscopes
Quality Improvement

Keywords

  • Airway Management
  • GlideScope
  • Intubation
  • Video Laryngoscopy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Learning curves for direct laryngoscopy and glidescope® video laryngoscopy in an emergency medicine residency. / Sakles, John C.; Mosier, Jarrod; Patanwala, Asad E; Dicken, John.

In: Western Journal of Emergency Medicine, Vol. 15, No. 7, 2014, p. 930-937.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ffa1013e015b4a53932fbe2511c7366d,
title = "Learning curves for direct laryngoscopy and glidescope{\circledR} video laryngoscopy in an emergency medicine residency",
abstract = "Introduction: Our objective is to evaluate the resident learning curves for direct laryngoscopy (DL) and GlideScope{\circledR} video laryngoscopy (GVL) over the course of an emergency medicine (EM) residency training program.Methods: This was an analysis of intubations performed in the emergency department (ED) by EM residents over a seven-year period from July 1, 2007 to June 30, 2014 at an academic ED with 70,000 annual visits. After EM residents perform an intubation in the ED they complete a continuous quality improvement (CQI) form. Data collected includes patient demographics, operator post-graduate year (PGY), difficult airway characteristics (DACs), method of intubation, device used for intubation and outcome of each attempt. We included in this analysis only adult intubations performed by EM residents using a DL or a standard reusable GVL. The primary outcome was first pass success, defined as a successful intubation with a single laryngoscope insertion. First pass success was evaluated for each PGY of training for DL and GVL. Logistic mixed-effects models were constructed for each device to determine the effect of PGY level on first pass success, after adjusting for important confounders.Results: Over the seven-year period, the DL was used as the initial device on 1,035 patients and the GVL was used as the initial device on 578 patients by EM residents. When using the DL the first past success of PGY-1 residents was 69.9{\%} (160/229; 95{\%} CI 63.5{\%}-75.7{\%}), of PGY-2 residents was 71.7{\%} (274/382; 95{\%} CI 66.9{\%}-76.2{\%}), and of PGY-3 residents was 72.9{\%} (309/424; 95{\%} CI 68.4{\%}-77.1{\%}). When using the GVL the first pass success of PGY-1 residents was 74.4{\%} (87/117; 95{\%} CI 65.5{\%}-82.0{\%}), of PGY-2 residents was 83.6{\%} (194/232; 95{\%} CI 76.7{\%}-87.7{\%}), and of PGY-3 residents was 90.0{\%} (206/229; 95{\%} CI 85.3{\%}-93.5{\%}). In the mixed-effects model for DL, first pass success for PGY-2 and PGY-3 residents did not improve compared to PGY-1 residents (PGY-2 aOR 1.3, 95{\%} CI 0.9-1.9; p-value 0.236) (PGY-3 aOR 1.5, 95{\%} CI 1.0-2.2, p-value 0.067). However, in the model for GVL, first pass success for PGY-2 and PGY-3 residents improved compared to PGY-1 residents (PGY-2 aOR 2.1, 95{\%} CI 1.1-3.8, p-value 0.021) (PGY-3 aOR 4.1, 95{\%} CI 2.1-8.0, p< 0.001).Conclusion: Over the course of residency training there was no significant improvement in EM resident first pass success with the DL, but substantial improvement with the GVL.",
keywords = "Airway Management, GlideScope, Intubation, Video Laryngoscopy",
author = "Sakles, {John C.} and Jarrod Mosier and Patanwala, {Asad E} and John Dicken",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.5811/westjem.2014.9.23691",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "930--937",
journal = "Western Journal of Emergency Medicine",
issn = "1936-900X",
publisher = "University of California",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Learning curves for direct laryngoscopy and glidescope® video laryngoscopy in an emergency medicine residency

AU - Sakles, John C.

AU - Mosier, Jarrod

AU - Patanwala, Asad E

AU - Dicken, John

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Introduction: Our objective is to evaluate the resident learning curves for direct laryngoscopy (DL) and GlideScope® video laryngoscopy (GVL) over the course of an emergency medicine (EM) residency training program.Methods: This was an analysis of intubations performed in the emergency department (ED) by EM residents over a seven-year period from July 1, 2007 to June 30, 2014 at an academic ED with 70,000 annual visits. After EM residents perform an intubation in the ED they complete a continuous quality improvement (CQI) form. Data collected includes patient demographics, operator post-graduate year (PGY), difficult airway characteristics (DACs), method of intubation, device used for intubation and outcome of each attempt. We included in this analysis only adult intubations performed by EM residents using a DL or a standard reusable GVL. The primary outcome was first pass success, defined as a successful intubation with a single laryngoscope insertion. First pass success was evaluated for each PGY of training for DL and GVL. Logistic mixed-effects models were constructed for each device to determine the effect of PGY level on first pass success, after adjusting for important confounders.Results: Over the seven-year period, the DL was used as the initial device on 1,035 patients and the GVL was used as the initial device on 578 patients by EM residents. When using the DL the first past success of PGY-1 residents was 69.9% (160/229; 95% CI 63.5%-75.7%), of PGY-2 residents was 71.7% (274/382; 95% CI 66.9%-76.2%), and of PGY-3 residents was 72.9% (309/424; 95% CI 68.4%-77.1%). When using the GVL the first pass success of PGY-1 residents was 74.4% (87/117; 95% CI 65.5%-82.0%), of PGY-2 residents was 83.6% (194/232; 95% CI 76.7%-87.7%), and of PGY-3 residents was 90.0% (206/229; 95% CI 85.3%-93.5%). In the mixed-effects model for DL, first pass success for PGY-2 and PGY-3 residents did not improve compared to PGY-1 residents (PGY-2 aOR 1.3, 95% CI 0.9-1.9; p-value 0.236) (PGY-3 aOR 1.5, 95% CI 1.0-2.2, p-value 0.067). However, in the model for GVL, first pass success for PGY-2 and PGY-3 residents improved compared to PGY-1 residents (PGY-2 aOR 2.1, 95% CI 1.1-3.8, p-value 0.021) (PGY-3 aOR 4.1, 95% CI 2.1-8.0, p< 0.001).Conclusion: Over the course of residency training there was no significant improvement in EM resident first pass success with the DL, but substantial improvement with the GVL.

AB - Introduction: Our objective is to evaluate the resident learning curves for direct laryngoscopy (DL) and GlideScope® video laryngoscopy (GVL) over the course of an emergency medicine (EM) residency training program.Methods: This was an analysis of intubations performed in the emergency department (ED) by EM residents over a seven-year period from July 1, 2007 to June 30, 2014 at an academic ED with 70,000 annual visits. After EM residents perform an intubation in the ED they complete a continuous quality improvement (CQI) form. Data collected includes patient demographics, operator post-graduate year (PGY), difficult airway characteristics (DACs), method of intubation, device used for intubation and outcome of each attempt. We included in this analysis only adult intubations performed by EM residents using a DL or a standard reusable GVL. The primary outcome was first pass success, defined as a successful intubation with a single laryngoscope insertion. First pass success was evaluated for each PGY of training for DL and GVL. Logistic mixed-effects models were constructed for each device to determine the effect of PGY level on first pass success, after adjusting for important confounders.Results: Over the seven-year period, the DL was used as the initial device on 1,035 patients and the GVL was used as the initial device on 578 patients by EM residents. When using the DL the first past success of PGY-1 residents was 69.9% (160/229; 95% CI 63.5%-75.7%), of PGY-2 residents was 71.7% (274/382; 95% CI 66.9%-76.2%), and of PGY-3 residents was 72.9% (309/424; 95% CI 68.4%-77.1%). When using the GVL the first pass success of PGY-1 residents was 74.4% (87/117; 95% CI 65.5%-82.0%), of PGY-2 residents was 83.6% (194/232; 95% CI 76.7%-87.7%), and of PGY-3 residents was 90.0% (206/229; 95% CI 85.3%-93.5%). In the mixed-effects model for DL, first pass success for PGY-2 and PGY-3 residents did not improve compared to PGY-1 residents (PGY-2 aOR 1.3, 95% CI 0.9-1.9; p-value 0.236) (PGY-3 aOR 1.5, 95% CI 1.0-2.2, p-value 0.067). However, in the model for GVL, first pass success for PGY-2 and PGY-3 residents improved compared to PGY-1 residents (PGY-2 aOR 2.1, 95% CI 1.1-3.8, p-value 0.021) (PGY-3 aOR 4.1, 95% CI 2.1-8.0, p< 0.001).Conclusion: Over the course of residency training there was no significant improvement in EM resident first pass success with the DL, but substantial improvement with the GVL.

KW - Airway Management

KW - GlideScope

KW - Intubation

KW - Video Laryngoscopy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84913531761&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84913531761&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5811/westjem.2014.9.23691

DO - 10.5811/westjem.2014.9.23691

M3 - Article

C2 - 25493156

AN - SCOPUS:84913531761

VL - 15

SP - 930

EP - 937

JO - Western Journal of Emergency Medicine

JF - Western Journal of Emergency Medicine

SN - 1936-900X

IS - 7

ER -