Lethal interference competition in the whitefly parasitoids Eretmocerus eremicus and Encarsia sophia

Timothy R. Collier, Martha S Hunter

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

44 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Recent population-dynamic theory suggests that mechanisms of lethal interference competition can have profound effects on parasitoid coexistence and pest suppression in biological control systems. We investigated lethal intraspecific and interspecific interference competition in Eretmocerus eremicus and Encarsia sophia, parasitoids of the whitefly pest, Bemisia tabaci. Our first experiments evaluated whether one or both species could suppress the progeny production of the other species through two mechanisms of lethal interference competition: (1) usurpation of hosts in cases of multiparasitism, and (2) host feeding on and killing parasitised hosts. We found that both species could suppress the progeny production of the other. E. eremicus' effect on E. sophia appeared to reflect multiparasitism. E. sophia's effect on E. eremicus appeared to reflect a combination of multi-parasitism and host feeding on parasitised hosts. Second, we investigated the effects of lethal intraspecific interference on conspecific progeny production in both species. E. sophia interfered intraspecifically by host feeding on parasitised hosts. E. eremicus also apparently host fed on parasitised hosts, however the effect of host feeding on conspecific progeny production was slight. Third, host dissections and behavioral observations confirmed the mechanisms inferred from the progeny production experiments. Our results suggest a need to consider mechanisms of lethal interference competition in theoretical and empirical research on parasitoid competition.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)147-154
Number of pages8
JournalOecologia
Volume129
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2001

Fingerprint

Eretmocerus eremicus
Encarsia
interference competition
whitefly
Aleyrodidae
parasitoids
multiparasitism
parasitoid
pests
dissection
Bemisia tabaci
parasitism
biological control
coexistence
control system

Keywords

  • Biological control
  • Host feeding
  • Interspecific competition
  • Intraspecific competition
  • Multiparasitism

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology

Cite this

Lethal interference competition in the whitefly parasitoids Eretmocerus eremicus and Encarsia sophia. / Collier, Timothy R.; Hunter, Martha S.

In: Oecologia, Vol. 129, No. 1, 2001, p. 147-154.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d206d0f7e8d4417daccbd42ef50a5fd4,
title = "Lethal interference competition in the whitefly parasitoids Eretmocerus eremicus and Encarsia sophia",
abstract = "Recent population-dynamic theory suggests that mechanisms of lethal interference competition can have profound effects on parasitoid coexistence and pest suppression in biological control systems. We investigated lethal intraspecific and interspecific interference competition in Eretmocerus eremicus and Encarsia sophia, parasitoids of the whitefly pest, Bemisia tabaci. Our first experiments evaluated whether one or both species could suppress the progeny production of the other species through two mechanisms of lethal interference competition: (1) usurpation of hosts in cases of multiparasitism, and (2) host feeding on and killing parasitised hosts. We found that both species could suppress the progeny production of the other. E. eremicus' effect on E. sophia appeared to reflect multiparasitism. E. sophia's effect on E. eremicus appeared to reflect a combination of multi-parasitism and host feeding on parasitised hosts. Second, we investigated the effects of lethal intraspecific interference on conspecific progeny production in both species. E. sophia interfered intraspecifically by host feeding on parasitised hosts. E. eremicus also apparently host fed on parasitised hosts, however the effect of host feeding on conspecific progeny production was slight. Third, host dissections and behavioral observations confirmed the mechanisms inferred from the progeny production experiments. Our results suggest a need to consider mechanisms of lethal interference competition in theoretical and empirical research on parasitoid competition.",
keywords = "Biological control, Host feeding, Interspecific competition, Intraspecific competition, Multiparasitism",
author = "Collier, {Timothy R.} and Hunter, {Martha S}",
year = "2001",
doi = "10.1007/s004420100706",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "129",
pages = "147--154",
journal = "Oecologia",
issn = "0029-8549",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Lethal interference competition in the whitefly parasitoids Eretmocerus eremicus and Encarsia sophia

AU - Collier, Timothy R.

AU - Hunter, Martha S

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - Recent population-dynamic theory suggests that mechanisms of lethal interference competition can have profound effects on parasitoid coexistence and pest suppression in biological control systems. We investigated lethal intraspecific and interspecific interference competition in Eretmocerus eremicus and Encarsia sophia, parasitoids of the whitefly pest, Bemisia tabaci. Our first experiments evaluated whether one or both species could suppress the progeny production of the other species through two mechanisms of lethal interference competition: (1) usurpation of hosts in cases of multiparasitism, and (2) host feeding on and killing parasitised hosts. We found that both species could suppress the progeny production of the other. E. eremicus' effect on E. sophia appeared to reflect multiparasitism. E. sophia's effect on E. eremicus appeared to reflect a combination of multi-parasitism and host feeding on parasitised hosts. Second, we investigated the effects of lethal intraspecific interference on conspecific progeny production in both species. E. sophia interfered intraspecifically by host feeding on parasitised hosts. E. eremicus also apparently host fed on parasitised hosts, however the effect of host feeding on conspecific progeny production was slight. Third, host dissections and behavioral observations confirmed the mechanisms inferred from the progeny production experiments. Our results suggest a need to consider mechanisms of lethal interference competition in theoretical and empirical research on parasitoid competition.

AB - Recent population-dynamic theory suggests that mechanisms of lethal interference competition can have profound effects on parasitoid coexistence and pest suppression in biological control systems. We investigated lethal intraspecific and interspecific interference competition in Eretmocerus eremicus and Encarsia sophia, parasitoids of the whitefly pest, Bemisia tabaci. Our first experiments evaluated whether one or both species could suppress the progeny production of the other species through two mechanisms of lethal interference competition: (1) usurpation of hosts in cases of multiparasitism, and (2) host feeding on and killing parasitised hosts. We found that both species could suppress the progeny production of the other. E. eremicus' effect on E. sophia appeared to reflect multiparasitism. E. sophia's effect on E. eremicus appeared to reflect a combination of multi-parasitism and host feeding on parasitised hosts. Second, we investigated the effects of lethal intraspecific interference on conspecific progeny production in both species. E. sophia interfered intraspecifically by host feeding on parasitised hosts. E. eremicus also apparently host fed on parasitised hosts, however the effect of host feeding on conspecific progeny production was slight. Third, host dissections and behavioral observations confirmed the mechanisms inferred from the progeny production experiments. Our results suggest a need to consider mechanisms of lethal interference competition in theoretical and empirical research on parasitoid competition.

KW - Biological control

KW - Host feeding

KW - Interspecific competition

KW - Intraspecific competition

KW - Multiparasitism

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034789967&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034789967&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s004420100706

DO - 10.1007/s004420100706

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0034789967

VL - 129

SP - 147

EP - 154

JO - Oecologia

JF - Oecologia

SN - 0029-8549

IS - 1

ER -