Lettuce, segmented labor markets, and the immigration discourse

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

It would seem to be ridiculously obvious that industries in the South employed an African American labor force. However, the hegemony of the immigration discourse-"they take jobs that nobody wants"-indicates the need to reiterate some historical facts. Do immigrants take jobs that nobody wants? The author reviews the assumptions of media reports and advocacy groups regarding labor market niches of immigrants. They portray a labor force that is immutably segmented into a primary and secondary sector. This notion is inconsistent with (a) early work theorizing a shifting labor market frontier, (b) earlier empirical work analyzing fluctuating boundaries, and (c) the contemporary labor market that exhibits decreasing segmentation. The author examines the poultry industry in five Southeastern states from 1980 to 2000. Although those jobs fit the profile of the secondary sector (that "nobody wants"), a decade earlier they were occupied by African Americans. We must revise the immigration debate.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)129-156
Number of pages28
JournalJournal of Black Studies
Volume39
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2008

Fingerprint

segmented labor market
secondary sector
immigration
labor market
Personnel
labor force
discourse
immigrant
primary sector
market niche
industry
hegemony
Poultry
Industry
Group
American

Keywords

  • African American workers
  • Immigrant workers
  • Labor substitution
  • South

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Communication

Cite this

Lettuce, segmented labor markets, and the immigration discourse. / Schwartzman, Kathleen C.

In: Journal of Black Studies, Vol. 39, No. 1, 09.2008, p. 129-156.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5d0910b334a9402eb0903a42c76eddd0,
title = "Lettuce, segmented labor markets, and the immigration discourse",
abstract = "It would seem to be ridiculously obvious that industries in the South employed an African American labor force. However, the hegemony of the immigration discourse-{"}they take jobs that nobody wants{"}-indicates the need to reiterate some historical facts. Do immigrants take jobs that nobody wants? The author reviews the assumptions of media reports and advocacy groups regarding labor market niches of immigrants. They portray a labor force that is immutably segmented into a primary and secondary sector. This notion is inconsistent with (a) early work theorizing a shifting labor market frontier, (b) earlier empirical work analyzing fluctuating boundaries, and (c) the contemporary labor market that exhibits decreasing segmentation. The author examines the poultry industry in five Southeastern states from 1980 to 2000. Although those jobs fit the profile of the secondary sector (that {"}nobody wants{"}), a decade earlier they were occupied by African Americans. We must revise the immigration debate.",
keywords = "African American workers, Immigrant workers, Labor substitution, South",
author = "Schwartzman, {Kathleen C}",
year = "2008",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1177/0021934706297009",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "39",
pages = "129--156",
journal = "Journal of Black Studies",
issn = "0021-9347",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Lettuce, segmented labor markets, and the immigration discourse

AU - Schwartzman, Kathleen C

PY - 2008/9

Y1 - 2008/9

N2 - It would seem to be ridiculously obvious that industries in the South employed an African American labor force. However, the hegemony of the immigration discourse-"they take jobs that nobody wants"-indicates the need to reiterate some historical facts. Do immigrants take jobs that nobody wants? The author reviews the assumptions of media reports and advocacy groups regarding labor market niches of immigrants. They portray a labor force that is immutably segmented into a primary and secondary sector. This notion is inconsistent with (a) early work theorizing a shifting labor market frontier, (b) earlier empirical work analyzing fluctuating boundaries, and (c) the contemporary labor market that exhibits decreasing segmentation. The author examines the poultry industry in five Southeastern states from 1980 to 2000. Although those jobs fit the profile of the secondary sector (that "nobody wants"), a decade earlier they were occupied by African Americans. We must revise the immigration debate.

AB - It would seem to be ridiculously obvious that industries in the South employed an African American labor force. However, the hegemony of the immigration discourse-"they take jobs that nobody wants"-indicates the need to reiterate some historical facts. Do immigrants take jobs that nobody wants? The author reviews the assumptions of media reports and advocacy groups regarding labor market niches of immigrants. They portray a labor force that is immutably segmented into a primary and secondary sector. This notion is inconsistent with (a) early work theorizing a shifting labor market frontier, (b) earlier empirical work analyzing fluctuating boundaries, and (c) the contemporary labor market that exhibits decreasing segmentation. The author examines the poultry industry in five Southeastern states from 1980 to 2000. Although those jobs fit the profile of the secondary sector (that "nobody wants"), a decade earlier they were occupied by African Americans. We must revise the immigration debate.

KW - African American workers

KW - Immigrant workers

KW - Labor substitution

KW - South

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=48249083446&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=48249083446&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0021934706297009

DO - 10.1177/0021934706297009

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:48249083446

VL - 39

SP - 129

EP - 156

JO - Journal of Black Studies

JF - Journal of Black Studies

SN - 0021-9347

IS - 1

ER -