Lexical stresses in Macedonian and Polish

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this paper, we argue that the distribution of lexical stresses under affixation follows from the architecture of metrical theory. In particular, we show that the distribution of lexical stresses in Macedonian and Polish and their behaviour under affixation can be accounted for straightforwardly by adopting revised obligatory-branching feet (henceforth ROB feet). These are feet where the head must dominate a heavy or accented syllable, and the non-head is free to dominate any kind of syllable (Hammond 1986). These facts cannot be accounted for uniformly under a theory without such a footing mechanism, e.g. that presented in Halle & Vergnaud (1987). The organisation of this paper is as follows. First, we outline a simplified version of the theory proposed by Halle & Vergnaud. We go on to show how it deals with exceptional stresses in Macedonian and Polish. It is shown that this theory is descriptively inadequate. The ROB theory is then outlined and an analysis of Macedonian and Polish is presented that is superior to the previous analysis.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)19-38
Number of pages20
JournalPhonology
Volume6
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1989

Fingerprint

Lexical Stress
Affixation
Footings

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

Lexical stresses in Macedonian and Polish. / Hammond, Michael.

In: Phonology, Vol. 6, No. 1, 1989, p. 19-38.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hammond, Michael. / Lexical stresses in Macedonian and Polish. In: Phonology. 1989 ; Vol. 6, No. 1. pp. 19-38.
@article{7022ebd755a445a49ba3bb122ac1ea6f,
title = "Lexical stresses in Macedonian and Polish",
abstract = "In this paper, we argue that the distribution of lexical stresses under affixation follows from the architecture of metrical theory. In particular, we show that the distribution of lexical stresses in Macedonian and Polish and their behaviour under affixation can be accounted for straightforwardly by adopting revised obligatory-branching feet (henceforth ROB feet). These are feet where the head must dominate a heavy or accented syllable, and the non-head is free to dominate any kind of syllable (Hammond 1986). These facts cannot be accounted for uniformly under a theory without such a footing mechanism, e.g. that presented in Halle & Vergnaud (1987). The organisation of this paper is as follows. First, we outline a simplified version of the theory proposed by Halle & Vergnaud. We go on to show how it deals with exceptional stresses in Macedonian and Polish. It is shown that this theory is descriptively inadequate. The ROB theory is then outlined and an analysis of Macedonian and Polish is presented that is superior to the previous analysis.",
author = "Michael Hammond",
year = "1989",
doi = "10.1017/S0952675700000932",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
pages = "19--38",
journal = "Phonology",
issn = "0952-6757",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Lexical stresses in Macedonian and Polish

AU - Hammond, Michael

PY - 1989

Y1 - 1989

N2 - In this paper, we argue that the distribution of lexical stresses under affixation follows from the architecture of metrical theory. In particular, we show that the distribution of lexical stresses in Macedonian and Polish and their behaviour under affixation can be accounted for straightforwardly by adopting revised obligatory-branching feet (henceforth ROB feet). These are feet where the head must dominate a heavy or accented syllable, and the non-head is free to dominate any kind of syllable (Hammond 1986). These facts cannot be accounted for uniformly under a theory without such a footing mechanism, e.g. that presented in Halle & Vergnaud (1987). The organisation of this paper is as follows. First, we outline a simplified version of the theory proposed by Halle & Vergnaud. We go on to show how it deals with exceptional stresses in Macedonian and Polish. It is shown that this theory is descriptively inadequate. The ROB theory is then outlined and an analysis of Macedonian and Polish is presented that is superior to the previous analysis.

AB - In this paper, we argue that the distribution of lexical stresses under affixation follows from the architecture of metrical theory. In particular, we show that the distribution of lexical stresses in Macedonian and Polish and their behaviour under affixation can be accounted for straightforwardly by adopting revised obligatory-branching feet (henceforth ROB feet). These are feet where the head must dominate a heavy or accented syllable, and the non-head is free to dominate any kind of syllable (Hammond 1986). These facts cannot be accounted for uniformly under a theory without such a footing mechanism, e.g. that presented in Halle & Vergnaud (1987). The organisation of this paper is as follows. First, we outline a simplified version of the theory proposed by Halle & Vergnaud. We go on to show how it deals with exceptional stresses in Macedonian and Polish. It is shown that this theory is descriptively inadequate. The ROB theory is then outlined and an analysis of Macedonian and Polish is presented that is superior to the previous analysis.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84976003879&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84976003879&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S0952675700000932

DO - 10.1017/S0952675700000932

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84976003879

VL - 6

SP - 19

EP - 38

JO - Phonology

JF - Phonology

SN - 0952-6757

IS - 1

ER -