Liberty, property, environmentalism

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The environment has often been thought to consist of resources that are unowned, and hence subject to the well-known tragedy of the commons. But in recent years, property ideas have been increasingly recruited for environmental protection, in a manner that appears to vindicate the view that property rights evolve along with the needs for resource management. Nevertheless, property regimes have some pitfalls for environmental resources: the relevant parties may not be able to come to agreement; property regimes may be weak or ineffective; they may be aimed at purposes inconsistent with environmental protection; property rights definitions may not work well for environmental resources; modern property regimes may promote monoculture rather than diverse environments. This essay describes these problems and asks to what degree they apply to a new effort to use property rights approaches, namely cap-and-trade programs to control greenhouse gases. It concludes that property rights, while imperfect and something of a retreat from a regime of complete liberty, may offer gains for environmental protection. But success will depend on close attention to the accountability and effectiveness of the governmental institutions necessary to support environmental property regimes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-25
Number of pages25
JournalSocial Philosophy and Policy
Volume26
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2009

Fingerprint

right of ownership
regime
environmental protection
resources
Liberty
Environmentalism
responsibility
Property Rights
management
Environmental Protection
Resources

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Philosophy
  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

Liberty, property, environmentalism. / Rose, Carol M.

In: Social Philosophy and Policy, Vol. 26, No. 2, 07.2009, p. 1-25.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{383067dd017f4a459ad25a4c1eec27b3,
title = "Liberty, property, environmentalism",
abstract = "The environment has often been thought to consist of resources that are unowned, and hence subject to the well-known tragedy of the commons. But in recent years, property ideas have been increasingly recruited for environmental protection, in a manner that appears to vindicate the view that property rights evolve along with the needs for resource management. Nevertheless, property regimes have some pitfalls for environmental resources: the relevant parties may not be able to come to agreement; property regimes may be weak or ineffective; they may be aimed at purposes inconsistent with environmental protection; property rights definitions may not work well for environmental resources; modern property regimes may promote monoculture rather than diverse environments. This essay describes these problems and asks to what degree they apply to a new effort to use property rights approaches, namely cap-and-trade programs to control greenhouse gases. It concludes that property rights, while imperfect and something of a retreat from a regime of complete liberty, may offer gains for environmental protection. But success will depend on close attention to the accountability and effectiveness of the governmental institutions necessary to support environmental property regimes.",
author = "Rose, {Carol M}",
year = "2009",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1017/S0265052509090153",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "1--25",
journal = "Social Philosophy and Policy",
issn = "0265-0525",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Liberty, property, environmentalism

AU - Rose, Carol M

PY - 2009/7

Y1 - 2009/7

N2 - The environment has often been thought to consist of resources that are unowned, and hence subject to the well-known tragedy of the commons. But in recent years, property ideas have been increasingly recruited for environmental protection, in a manner that appears to vindicate the view that property rights evolve along with the needs for resource management. Nevertheless, property regimes have some pitfalls for environmental resources: the relevant parties may not be able to come to agreement; property regimes may be weak or ineffective; they may be aimed at purposes inconsistent with environmental protection; property rights definitions may not work well for environmental resources; modern property regimes may promote monoculture rather than diverse environments. This essay describes these problems and asks to what degree they apply to a new effort to use property rights approaches, namely cap-and-trade programs to control greenhouse gases. It concludes that property rights, while imperfect and something of a retreat from a regime of complete liberty, may offer gains for environmental protection. But success will depend on close attention to the accountability and effectiveness of the governmental institutions necessary to support environmental property regimes.

AB - The environment has often been thought to consist of resources that are unowned, and hence subject to the well-known tragedy of the commons. But in recent years, property ideas have been increasingly recruited for environmental protection, in a manner that appears to vindicate the view that property rights evolve along with the needs for resource management. Nevertheless, property regimes have some pitfalls for environmental resources: the relevant parties may not be able to come to agreement; property regimes may be weak or ineffective; they may be aimed at purposes inconsistent with environmental protection; property rights definitions may not work well for environmental resources; modern property regimes may promote monoculture rather than diverse environments. This essay describes these problems and asks to what degree they apply to a new effort to use property rights approaches, namely cap-and-trade programs to control greenhouse gases. It concludes that property rights, while imperfect and something of a retreat from a regime of complete liberty, may offer gains for environmental protection. But success will depend on close attention to the accountability and effectiveness of the governmental institutions necessary to support environmental property regimes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70349201302&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70349201302&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S0265052509090153

DO - 10.1017/S0265052509090153

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:70349201302

VL - 26

SP - 1

EP - 25

JO - Social Philosophy and Policy

JF - Social Philosophy and Policy

SN - 0265-0525

IS - 2

ER -